chuckywang
Lifer
- Jan 12, 2004
- 20,133
- 1
- 0
Originally posted by: mrzed
And here I thought all you car people were into 1/4 mile times and 19" rims etc to make up for the size of your penis.
Turns out it's all about your soul? I am deeply sorry, I had you all wrong. Far from worrying about earthly concerns, you are avoiding Corollas because they would risk your eternal souls, suck out your spirit, and render you vulnerable to Satan.
Originally posted by: Strk
Yes, but most people just want a reliable commuter car, so it doesn't really matter.
Originally posted by: BD2003
Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Originally posted by: raildogg
Originally posted by: BD2003
Originally posted by: raildogg
Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Originally posted by: uhohs
cars don't have souls.
people just make up crap to make themselves feel better.
A Toyota will do every important thing that a person expects out of a car and do it better than any other car on the market.
Define soul.
Not really. It just has mass appeal, just like Dell does, or Wal-Mart does. That does not mean it is better necessarily, although they do make good cars.
Walmart has mass appeal cause its cheaper. Toyota has mass appeal because they have a long track record of building dependable cars. Very big difference.
I agree, but it appeals to the masses. Wal-Mart does not have the sort of image that Toyota has. It is comparable to Dell however since Dell has long been viewed as a more reliable alternative to Compaq, HP, Gateway etc. Its pricing does not hurt either. There are other car manufacturers that build reliable cars too, but they do not have the mass appeal that Toyota has.
It's certainly not "cool" to shop at Walmart and rap singers will never sing about their Toyota rollin' on dubs.
However, they all listen to what consumers actually want rather than trying to be the flashiest, trendiest, etc.
And for everyone that says "OMG, all Honda has to do is release a Civic Type R w/the S2000 engine and Ford has to put a V8 and RWD on the Fusion and they'll sell like hotcakes. OMFG!" remember that Toyota gets its monster sales numbers without a single sports car or convertible, and only boring, utilitarian sedans.
Thats only a recent development. There's the MR2, the Celica, and even the Solara, which comes in a convertible. If you count Scion, there's the tC. There's also the Supra of times past.
Originally posted by: chuckywang
What about the Supra?
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: Queasy
The South Park episode, Best Friends Forever, confirmed that the Japanese do not have souls. Toyota cars are made by a Japanese company. Therefore, Toyota cars do not have souls.
And since the Japanese and Germans were allies during WWII it must follow that Germans do not have souls either. German cars are made by Germans. Therefore, German cars do not have souls.
Modern Toyotas are built so that ANYONE can drive them right. Hence, no quirks, no soul, and no personality.Originally posted by: Vic
Don't forget quirky. A car with soul must have a distinct personality, so that its owner is the only person who really knows how to drive it right.
I can't entirely agree with this. The Celicas of the RWD glory days may have been (relatively) light, but they did have the wonderfully torquey 20R, 22R, and 22R-E engines in them.Originally posted by: b0mbrman
That was back when all companies had a sports car. I think you said it best: "times past."
The transition of Toyota from Celica to tC best defines just how in touch they really are with the market.
The Celica is comparatively
*light
*high-revving, peaky
The tC is comparatively
*heavy
*torquey
eg better around town, rather than being better along a long, twisty road
Originally posted by: Vic
I can't entirely agree with this. The Celicas of the RWD glory days may have been (relatively) light, but they did have the wonderfully torquey 20R, 22R, and 22R-E engines in them.Originally posted by: b0mbrman
That was back when all companies had a sports car. I think you said it best: "times past."
The transition of Toyota from Celica to tC best defines just how in touch they really are with the market.
The Celica is comparatively
*light
*high-revving, peaky
The tC is comparatively
*heavy
*torquey
eg better around town, rather than being better along a long, twisty road
If the tC was RWD instead of FWD, I'd say it was the rebirth of the '84 GT-S.
Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Originally posted by: Vic
I can't entirely agree with this. The Celicas of the RWD glory days may have been (relatively) light, but they did have the wonderfully torquey 20R, 22R, and 22R-E engines in them.Originally posted by: b0mbrman
That was back when all companies had a sports car. I think you said it best: "times past."
The transition of Toyota from Celica to tC best defines just how in touch they really are with the market.
The Celica is comparatively
*light
*high-revving, peaky
The tC is comparatively
*heavy
*torquey
eg better around town, rather than being better along a long, twisty road
If the tC was RWD instead of FWD, I'd say it was the rebirth of the '84 GT-S.
That's a pretty big if...not to mention that it would still be overweight
[Edit] All this isn't to say that it's a bad car. It's a wonderful car...for commuters and plodding around the city. Whereas the Celica was a wonderful car to take through the canyons
Originally posted by: BD2003
I can most definitely assure you that the latest gen celica is fun to take through twisty roads.
Originally posted by: Kilgor
People that drive Corollas might be soul less, but most of the people I see driving Civics are brainless.
Originally posted by: raildogg
Originally posted by: Kilgor
People that drive Corollas might be soul less, but most of the people I see driving Civics are brainless.
You mean the sedan drivers or the coupe drivers? The ones from pre-2000 or post-2000?
Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Originally posted by: BD2003
I can most definitely assure you that the latest gen celica is fun to take through twisty roads.
That's exactly what I said
