zinfamous
No Lifer
- Jul 12, 2006
- 111,905
- 31,435
- 146
Salon? The Nation? Mother Jones?
ETA: How do you define "Liberal Conspiracy?"
"Wage Gap"
"White Supremacy"
"Rape Culture"
That's how.
I think you just scored an own goal.
Salon? The Nation? Mother Jones?
ETA: How do you define "Liberal Conspiracy?"
"Wage Gap"
"White Supremacy"
"Rape Culture"
That's how.
You really are hung up on rape, eh? Interesting...
I enjoy how he calls rape culture a liberal conspiracy after Cosby, Ailes, and Trump.
How many (alleged) women did they harass combined?
Hell the EEOC sees several thousand cases of alleged sexual harassment a year and those are just the ones reported. (Interestingly about 15-20% are reported by men).
No painmans list looks like real things he'd rather not think about as he gives it up to the Donald.
Maybe it's a matter of having an attitude where what is theirs (or what was once theirs) is being taken away against their will by "others" that don't look, behave and talk like them. And when that "threat" is exploited for certain political advantage via overly-hyped hate and fear propaganda, well, just look at what happened when the GOP did it to their constituents. A lot of folks were presented with every mental hook conceivable whether they asked for it or not by the GOP, and it's something that Trump took off with in grand fashion.
*snip for focus, I'm onboard with the rest*
It is a statistical fact that people who self report as conservative have larger right amygdalae than people who self report as liberal in a sample of people tested and that such self reporting people when studied for psychological traits divide in reactions in various tests designed around phenomena predicted to be affected by the right amygdala, higher reactivity to startling sounds, focus on disgusting images over pleasant ones, avoidance of facts that contradict personal beliefs and so on. I think if you google 16 peer review studies on liberal conservative brain differences you may find a summary of a collection of them done some years ago. Maybe I can do that for you: Seems like it's up to 20 with an update:Moon said that science has proven that conspiracy theory thinking comes from an enlarged amygdala which occurs only in conservatives. I don't know if I completely understand or believe what Moon said but it is an interesting hypothesis.
The problem for me is that the world is not "liberal" and "conservative". It is an enormous sliding scale with billions of variations in political views.
Salon? The Nation? Mother Jones?
ETA: How do you define "Liberal Conspiracy?"
"Wage Gap"
"White Supremacy"
"Rape Culture"
That's how.
Generally I don't expect this to be the case.
The polarized versions of the liberal and conservative camps are in my mind 2 different solutions to the same conflict:
separation/dependence
The conservative side is more projective -- seeing others as threats and responsible for their own failures
The liberal side is more introjective -- taking on an exaggerated sense of controlling the external environment
Naturally, conspiracy theorists are going to align with the former. The latter is probably more polarized with extreme socialist/communist viewpoints.
Personally, I wish society better supported alternative compromises to the need for autonomy and the reality of dependence.
It is a statistical fact that people who self report as conservative have larger right amygdalae than people who self report as liberal in a sample of people tested and that such self reporting people when studied for psychological traits divide in reactions in various tests designed around phenomena predicted to be affected by the right amygdala, higher reactivity to startling sounds, focus on disgusting images over pleasant ones, avoidance of facts that contradict personal beliefs and so on. I think if you google 16 peer review studies on liberal conservative brain differences you may find a summary of a collection of them done some years ago. Maybe I can do that for you: Seems like it's up to 20 with an update:
http://2016election.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=005927
Generally I don't expect this to be the case.
The polarized versions of the liberal and conservative camps are in my mind 2 different solutions to the same conflict:
separation/dependence
The conservative side is more projective -- seeing others as threats and responsible for their own failures
The liberal side is more introjective -- taking on an exaggerated sense of controlling the external environment
Naturally, conspiracy theorists are going to align with the former. The latter is probably more polarized with extreme socialist/communist viewpoints.
Personally, I wish society better supported alternative compromises to the need for autonomy and the reality of dependence.
Those aren't liberal conspiracy sites (though they usually do suck eggs) but thanks for playing... please insert coin and try again!
This seems as though poor quality biological evidence.
Nonetheless, I will readily assent to their being biological proclivity and biological consequence in relation to conservative and liberal political identifications.
What I would like to hear from you is a statement of what implications are carried from an awareness of such a difference.
Moon has made up science.Moon said that science has proven that conspiracy theory thinking comes from an enlarged amygdala which occurs only in conservatives. I don't know if I completely understand or believe what Moon said but it is an interesting hypothesis.
The problem for me is that the world is not "liberal" and "conservative". It is an enormous sliding scale with billions of variations in political views.
Moon has made up science.
Oh, there are plenty of liberal conspiracy websites.There are plenty of right wing websites full of Hillary conspiracy theories, always "breaking" news about how the lately scandal is going to sink her campaign. They are all completely delusional, and I'm wondering if there are similar sites with a liberal skew? I know there are some very biased liberal outlets but any that are so egregiously false?
I enjoy how he calls rape culture a liberal conspiracy after Cosby, Ailes, and Trump.
How many (alleged) women did they harass combined?
Hell the EEOC sees several thousand cases of alleged sexual harassment a year and those are just the ones reported. (Interestingly about 15-20% are reported by men).
No painmans list looks like real things he'd rather not think about as he gives it up to the Donald.
Why don't you quote me directly?
Say my name...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQzULRD6LJY
...And quote my shit.
You are not worth the time to quote, more or less.
IMHO.
And never has been a prerequisite for a reply anyways.
But rant away.
You are not worth the time to quote the vast majority of the time, more or less.
IMHO.
And never has been a prerequisite for a reply anyways.
But rant away.
Why don't you quote me directly?
Say my name...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQzULRD6LJY
...And quote my shit.
Ok painman I've quoted you and your appropriately called shit.Salon? The Nation? Mother Jones?
ETA: How do you define "Liberal Conspiracy?"
"Wage Gap"
"White Supremacy"
"Rape Culture"
That's how.
