Cigar smoke is significantly thicker than cig smoke, but it's also immensely more clean. You don't see cigar companies dumping in nicotine to get smokers addicted. Cigars aren't addictive in the typical sense like cigs are. They're much more refined and classy. They're an acquired taste. You can read up on the net about the things that make a cigar a good cigar and they've got nothing to do with smell and taste, surprisingly. It's common to find people who like poor quality cigars and people who don't like high quality cigars because they base their decision on taste/smell/size. A cigar afficionado bases their decision on things like consistancy of the taste/smell, burn time, the roll, and the packing of the cigar. Consistancy of a make/model of cigar is typically decided over many, MANY of the same cigars. Apparently in order to "test" a cigar to see whether it's good or not, one typically needs to smoke a specific brand's specific "model" of cigar over the course of sometimes years. That's a bit much, for me. I guess I'm too impatient to hold off on a decision until having smoked dozens and dozens of the same cigar to see if the next one was exactly the same as the previous one. I think it stems from not being experienced enough to be able to mark the subtle differences between two cigars out of the same box. I don't think most people, myself included, can actually smoke two out of the same box and go "oh, hmm, yeah I can tell the difference" unless they're REALLY cheap cigars.