mikeymikec
Lifer
- May 19, 2011
- 20,944
- 16,183
- 136
Furthermore i am very shocked that you have built so many computers and have never received a anti static straps with your parts. The parts i have ordered (way less than 150 builds) have had special gloves, straps all kinds of things, maybe you wrap your hardware in bubble wrap too instead of anti static bags, i mean esd is a myth right?
No-one has said that ESD is a myth, so dispense with the straw man.
You also sound funny, how can i prove it is working? Simple,a device known as a oscilloscope? perhaps a multi meter.
That doesn't prove anything in relation to your argument, because your argument calls for proof for something that you haven't even quantified yet. It would be like saying that drinking tap water is killing people and everyone should drink filtered water, but not showing any evidence of what tap water contains and is doing to people that filtered water is not. It may well be the case that filtered water is healthier to drink, just as it may well be the case that not using an anti-static strip is damaging hardware in some way, but since you have nothing to base your argument on, you may as well be claiming that working with PC components without an anti-static strip angers the gods and that judgement is coming.
If you want to continue to argue you can, but saying because ive built 150 pc and havnt completely killed more than 1 hd ram stick mainboard, that it is completely safe, is not much of a argument, i can drive 100 mph daily for years and still know that there is a risk even with zero crashes.
Lets pretend that none of your builds had any ESD occur at all. So what % should we worry about things? even with a strap yes im sure ESD happens too.
You've also failed to understand the argument that is contrary to your position. People have advised that they do such-and-such and have not experienced any problems associated with ESD (such as what VirtualLarry described). No-one has said that this approach guarantees anything. I have not argued that my experience actually definitively means anything.
Others are saying what they have observed, and you're arguing based on something you haven't observed (or at least you haven't bothered to enlighten us of the details). Do you not see the logical flaw in your position?