Sadly, a lot of people think it is a badge of honor to work insane hours. With few exceptions, it isn't and in fact, I think people who do it are getting taken advantage of and don't see it. That was me a few years ago and I finally had enough and stopped doing it.
This.
Sadly, a lot of people think it is a badge of honor to work insane hours. With few exceptions, it isn't and in fact, I think people who do it are getting taken advantage of and don't see it. That was me a few years ago and I finally had enough and stopped doing it.
0 hour work weeks.
The pay is ok.
I don't see the reason why people here work over 50 hours a week unless they love their job. In which case, I don't really see it as much as work. I'm guessing in the case where they don't love their job that they don't have anything significantly better to do with their time.
Well, damn. My boss did nothing but complain about the people who never accepted overtime and I thought he appreciated my insane hours. In fact, someone I work with on two of my workdays got fired recently and I'm on my weekend when she would normally be working so I keep reminding him that whoever he's covering the shift with these past few days could cover it on one of the days I already work and then he could use me on my weekend (much preferable and easier than asking someone to work a double). He never even asks anyone to cover until the day of the shift even with several days' notice and never even tries to split extra shifts (always just tries to get someone to work a double).
working more hours w/out a pay increase simply devalues you.
i work 40 hours a week and very rarely will i work more.
i will never be at a job where it is normal to work 45-50 hours a week because i enjoy my time off. additionally, if i were to work a job like that, i would expect at least 20% over the average salary for a 40 hour week.
working more hours w/out a pay increase simply devalues you.
I don't think I've ever asked - what's the plan for long term income? Real estate properties / landlording, pure stock, something else? I feel like I'm missing out on learning something important.
The problem with that approach is that you're likely sacrificing the best years of your life. It might be worth it in your 20s, but once you hit 30 or maybe mid-30s, it is time to focus on other things IMO. You have to strike a balance.
I could go back to working long hours, never going on vacations, etc, but what would it really get me? It might get me more money, but what good is that? Sure, I might be able to retire a few years earlier. However, you can't completely put all your eggs in one basket and hope you can enjoy life by retiring a little earlier, because that day may never come. One of my grandfathers died at 57, another at 67, and my dad at 63 and none got to enjoy retirement. I don't want to take that chance so I'd rather live with less money now and get to enjoy things (traveling all over the world, for example) than hope I can do it in 20 years.
if you don't mind me asking, what do you do?12-16 hour shifts (average) for 35-56 days straight, followed by 14-21 days off straight. Repeat. Won't be able to do it forever though.
