Originally posted by: thomsbrain
i have a monster guitar cable. it sounds good, but not any better than any other high quality cable, and it was a lot more expensive. the worst part is, i play "rough" and it was destroyed in only a couple months, while other cables, even the cheap ones, have lasted much longer.
The problem with that argument is that most of the power consumption in speakers is at the lower frequencies
Originally posted by: HappyCracker
I think it's all about perception. If you read a lot of high-end hi-fi (not that cheap bose or yamaha crap) they talk about smoothness and soundstage. Some of it sounds a bit farfetched to me. These are people who level their shelves, set the equipment up on these wierd little pointy thingies, and more. I refuse to go high end, but I also refuse monster, they're just a name that sounds impressive. Get some kimber kable, or nordost. kimber seems to be more common sense to me. Don't bother with good cables for a computer speaker system, not really worth it.
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
i have a monster guitar cable. it sounds good, but not any better than any other high quality cable, and it was a lot more expensive. the worst part is, i play "rough" and it was destroyed in only a couple months, while other cables, even the cheap ones, have lasted much longer.
I'd tend to agree thomsbrain, way overpriced for ok quality at best. Some cable however you can use and abuse for years setting up and tearing down.
Originally posted by: HappyCracker
I think it's all about perception. If you read a lot of high-end hi-fi (not that cheap bose or yamaha crap) they talk about smoothness and soundstage. Some of it sounds a bit farfetched to me. These are people who level their shelves, set the equipment up on these wierd little pointy thingies, and more. I refuse to go high end, but I also refuse monster, they're just a name that sounds impressive. Get some kimber kable, or nordost. kimber seems to be more common sense to me. Don't bother with good cables for a computer speaker system, not really worth it.
Originally posted by: her209
They are freakin expensive. Do you find them worth the money?
Originally posted by: SportSC4
IMHO...
The majority of people do not need to buy them, they won't notice any difference. The only people that benefit are those w/ McIntosh amps and spend 30k on their systems (well, in the audiophile range).
Joe Sixpack who buys a nice receiver for 1k, speakers for ~500$ and puts them in a room where the sound dynamics hinder the sound, much more than normal cables would, won't notice a difference.
But places like Circuit City, Best Buy, and Soundtrack fool these people into spending way too much money on cables for the systems they have. They are overpriced (and overkill) for the majority of people.
Originally posted by: amnesiac
Any of you people advocating high-priced cables -- look up all the double-blind studies that compare zip cord with expensive cables.
"Audiophiles" who claimed to be able to hear the difference between $30 and $3000 cable showed that they were no better at distinguishing the differences than pure chance. In fact, when the test subjects were shown the "expensive" cable they rated it higher based on looks alone, even though the cables being used were still the zip cords. The benefits from using such expensive interconnects are purely metaphysical and philosophical. By all means, if you want to spend $10,000 on cables, go do so but it would be like buying $2000 Prada underpants when a $20 pair of Jockeys is made of the exact same thing and serves the same purpose. No one's going to be looking at either of them, anyway.
Originally posted by: Thegonagle
Will electrons flow just as easily through any other copper wire of the same gauge that costs less?Are Monster Cables overpriced?
(The answer to both questions is yes. Electrons don't care how much your wires cost.)
Originally posted by: Muse
Agreed. I think a whole whole LOT of the high end audio market is driven by the Emporer's New Clothes syndrome, and Monster etc. cabling is definitely part of that scene. I spied one at a flea market a couple months ago, about a 6 footer. Asked how much and the guy said $1. I passed it up. My home theater system sounds great (see Baby Rigzilla in my sig) and the cabling is adequate but didn't bleed my bank account.
Originally posted by: jaydee
I think this is the most lopsided vote in the history of ATOT.
Originally posted by: HappyCracker
Well, question then: What kind of systems are you guys running with these cables? I didn't put mine in 'system rigs' because it's overclocked too much jkI'm running a NAD C370 integrated, C270 power amp, both in bridge mode (1 to each speaker), and the C541 cd player. As far as cables go, I'm using the same ones I got when I bought the whole deal, so I can't personally vouch for differences in cabling. When I got rid of an older Yamaha CD player, I did notice a big difference there, as the NAD is smoother, but that's beside the point. I wish stores had a 'try it for a few days' policy, because this crap is so expensive, once you buy it, you're sorta stuck. It won't sound the same when you take it home as opposed to when you hear it in the store. I've moved this thing to 5 different rooms over the course of the past two years and each time it never fails to amaze me as to how different it sounds. I fear this is the speakers and the acoustics of the room however. I do know these amps are extremely transparent. Not that I'm a big Metallica fan (sellouts), but their black album sounds somewhat harsh and tinny, and it's not the system. I don't think cables would be able to change the way a CD sounds enough to kill that. One rule I've always heard is: buy good interconnects, speaker cables don't matter so much, just get a big enough gauge. I don't mean to inflame anyone with this, hope I didn't. And I'm out.
