Pr0d1gy
Diamond Member
- Jan 30, 2005
- 7,776
- 0
- 76
Nobody is buying that one...lolIt helps pass the time while on multi hour conference calls.![]()
Nobody is buying that one...lolIt helps pass the time while on multi hour conference calls.![]()
so you are wasting your company's money then. socialist.![]()
Actually, what you are doing is called wasting time. Like most people in this country you do very little for way too much and then blame the government that put that amazing system into place for you to thrive in with almost no effort. Shocking, I know.Nah, I am multitasking. ()
The call is over, another call will not start for a few hours. You guys will miss me. :wub:
You have obviously never sat through a multi hour conference call where your attendance was required but you did not have any input. One day you might get a job. When you do, you might get one that has conference calls. If this unlikely scenario happens, you will then understand.
In the event the likely happens and you never are asked to be part of a conference call, you can read Dilbert and gain some insight.
What do you have against Cisco engineers? We're down wit BGP (yeah you know me!)lol, oh cybrsage, that's classic. Your job explains so, so much about you.
LOL, yes you are always in error here it seems....you can't even remember when you accuse people of criminal activity?I only ever called you a stalker. If I said that about anyone else, it was in error. Can you link me to where I called someone other than you a stalker?
You must love being shown wrong a LOT because you have put this idiocy in many threads. Here you go:LOL, yes you are always in error here it seems....you can't even remember when you accuse people of criminal activity?
Let me remind you, since you "claim" to forget":
Link
You have accused me and two other people in this thread of criminal activity for no reason or proof, other then you are a troll.
But you know this already, don't you?
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/stalker?s=tstalk·er
  /ˈstɔkər/ http://dictionary.reference.com/help/luna/IPA_pron_key.htmlShow Spelled[staw-ker] http://dictionary.reference.com/help/luna/Spell_pron_key.htmlShow IPA
noun 1. a person who pursues game, prey, or a person stealthily.
2. a person who harasses another person, as a former lover, a famous person, etc., in an aggressive, often threatening and illegal manner: Hollywood stars often have security guards to keep dangerous stalkers at bay.
Asians aren't ruled by elites that inflict mass 3rd world immigration onto the unwilling host populations of their countries (at least not yet). Whites are starting to wake up though at least in Europe, as you see with the much needed rise of ethnic nationalism. The colonialism jab is just sour grapes from loser cultures that for whatever reason couldn't get their shit together and industrialize themselves to compete on a global scale.Also Europe, Canada and Australia are seeing a fast rising % of non-whites. I would say that the tables have made a 180 as far as white dominance of the world goes, with the former in a steady decline now both in terms of sheer numbers and as a % of every country in the West. Which is a good thing as Colonialism was nasty and karma is at work..
Once, again, no point from you? You claimed you didn't call anyone else a stalker....I have PROVED YOU WRONG AGAIN.You must love being shown wrong a LOT because you have put this idiocy in many threads. Here you go:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/stalker?s=t
So you lied, again, and now that you have been proved wrong, AGAIN, you are ignoring you are wrong and lying. Gee, known troll lying and trolling, that is shocking!I only ever called you a stalker. If I said that about anyone else, it was in error. Can you link me to where I called someone other than you a stalker?
Never made that claim. Your entire faux outrage is based on something you made up.Once, again, no point from you? You claimed you didn't call anyone else a stalker....I have PROVED YOU WRONG AGAIN.
His outrage is based on the fact that you refuse to debate with him and instead call him a stalker. Thus you ARE a troll and need to be ignored.Never made that claim. Your entire faux outrage is based on something you made up.
LOL, as you like to point out to everyone else, and somehow think it dosen't apply to you, willful misinformation is against forum rules.Never made that claim. Your entire faux outrage is based on something you made up.
I gave links to your posts where you accused myself and two other members of stalking. You have willfully lied, once again.I only ever called you a stalker. If I said that about anyone else, it was in error. Can you link me to where I called someone other than you a stalker?
Reported for misspelling and infantile dialogue! /sOh, and reported to the mods for inuslts and willfull ignorance.