No, and I'd be surprised to see it.Originally posted by: mikecel79
Anything about a 4th gen iPod?
Originally posted by: Eug
H.264 codec to be included in QuickTime 7. Hi-def will be doable with current DVD storage sizes and bitrates.
A high-def 8 Mbps H.264 video will play back fine on a dual G5 Power Mac. Apple demonstrated that at NAB 2004.Originally posted by: RaynorWolfcastle
AFAIK, H.264 has ridiculous encoding requirements (something on the order of < 5 fps on a 3 GHz P4); even, the decoding requirements were pretty stiff: you needed something like a 2 GHz P4 to get DVD resolution videos to playback in real time.
Originally posted by: Eug
A high-def 8 Mbps H.264 video will play back fine on a dual G5 Power Mac. Apple demonstrated that at NAB 2004.Originally posted by: RaynorWolfcastle
AFAIK, H.264 has ridiculous encoding requirements (something on the order of < 5 fps on a 3 GHz P4); even, the decoding requirements were pretty stiff: you needed something like a 2 GHz P4 to get DVD resolution videos to playback in real time.
It wouldn't work on an iMac or laptop though.
Start guess:Originally posted by: Eug
Why do they specify "virtual" memory though?
Yeah, I wondered about that after I posted it. But I woulda thought that Steve would have hyped up the 8 MB process bit, since some of the science types have already been complaining about the 4 GB limitation in Panther.Originally posted by: dullard
The new G5 can only handly 8 GB. Thus it is silly to say the OS can handle 16 exabytes when the hardware cannot. The words virtual memory bring everything back into reality. Sure the software can handle it, but since the hardware cannot, anything over 8 GB must be virtual memory.Originally posted by: Eug
Why do they specify "virtual" memory though?
The Power Mac product manager essentially stated as much two weeks ago when intimating how hard it is to get the G5 into a laptop or consumer desktop.Originally posted by: Eug
No iMac G5??!?!?!!![]()
Yeah, although he specifically made the comment that the PowerBook G5 and the 3 GHz Power Mac would not appear in 2004, but didn't make the same comment for the iMac G5. So there's still hope for this summer.Originally posted by: manlyThe Power Mac product manager essentially stated as much two weeks ago when intimating how hard it is to get the G5 into a laptop or consumer desktop.Originally posted by: Eug
No iMac G5??!?!?!!![]()
Right now, it would also bite into Power Mac sales as well.
No, because the Tiger page explicitly states that it has full 32-bit support with support for G3s to G5s, and will support 32-bit/64-bit fat binaries too.Originally posted by: ViRGE
The Core Image thing is double-plus interesting, since it will be done with AGP cards, even though ATI's been claiming that kind of stuff needs PCIe.
PS Anyone else get the impression Tiger will be 64bit only(i.e. G5 required)?