dlock13
Platinum Member
- Oct 24, 2006
- 2,806
- 2
- 81
Uhh... Then how do they explain this monitor using such a resolution?
http://www.anandtech.com/show/8496/dell-previews-27inch-5k-ultrasharp-monitor-5120x2880
Uhh... Then how do they explain this monitor using such a resolution?
http://www.anandtech.com/show/8496/dell-previews-27inch-5k-ultrasharp-monitor-5120x2880
Uhh... Then how do they explain this monitor using such a resolution?
http://www.anandtech.com/show/8496/dell-previews-27inch-5k-ultrasharp-monitor-5120x2880
Sorry Apple, not sticking to a standard 4K resolution on the iMac just seems dumb to me. Plus, whatever GPU you put in there probably can't handle it well.
I'm not sure why they have 16 GB as the entry model for $499 for the Air 2. They seriously couldn't have bumped that up to 32 GB?
It doesn't exist. Also, it's just two monitors glued together. It requires two DisplayPort connectors.
5K requires DisplayPort 1.3 which was just released last month.
I was hoping the updated MacMini would have an SSD and not a traditional HDD. I wonder how hard it is to swap on your own. Anyone know?
Oh well, for $500, I will likely be picking one up soon to start some dev work. I would imagine the first $2,000 I make (if I make any), would be put towards a rMBP.
It's not that difficult to do, takes about 10-15 mins. - you can get a kit that has tools + an extra SATA adapter - that lets you hook up an SSD along with the stock HDD (dual drive configuration). This all from a 2012 Mac Mini perspective.I was hoping the updated MacMini would have an SSD and not a traditional HDD. I wonder how hard it is to swap on your own. Anyone know?
Oh well, for $500, I will likely be picking one up soon to start some dev work. I would imagine the first $2,000 I make (if I make any), would be put towards a rMBP.
They did the same thing for the iPhones. I suspect it's because there's a lot of newbies out there who don't really give a damn about base storage, or else just don't know any better.
What's worse is the re-release of the iPhone 4S with 8 GB RAM in 2013, and then the re-release of the iPhone 5c with 8 GB RAM in 2014.
I'll be sending a PSA on my social media advising them not to go for the 16 GB base models... and to stay the hell away from the original iPad mini with ancient specs.
I'm not sure why they have 16 GB as the entry model for $499 for the Air 2. They seriously couldn't have bumped that up to 32 GB?
I really wanted a Mini 3 LTE that was spec equivalent - using the A8x even slightly lower clock speed with the Air 2. This is so disappointing - guess I'm going with the Nexus 9. Or I'll just wait till next generation of iPad
it needs 2 to do 4k correct? I do admit that this seems odd that the imac can now power a higher rez display vs the pro
id love to see a stand alone panel at this rez or 4k, more of them should drive the price down for the rest of the stuff out there
"
Much more interesting is how Apple is driving it. Since no one has a 5K timing controller (TCON) yet, Apple went and built their own. This is the first time were aware of Apple doing such a thing for a Mac, but its likely they just havent talked about it before. In any case, Apple was kind enough to confirm that they are driving the new iMacs display with a single TCON. This is not a multi-tile display, but instead is a single 5120x2880 mode.
This also means that since it isnt multi-tile, Apple would need to drive it over a single DisplayPort connection, which is actually impossible with conventional DisplayPort HBR2. Were still getting to the bottom of how Apple is doing this (and hence the sneaky nature of the iMac), but currently our best theory is that Apple is running an overclocked DisplayPort/eDP interface along with some very low overhead timings to get just enough bandwidth for the job. Since the iMac is an all-in-one device, Apple is more or less free to violate specifications and do what they want so long as it isnt advertised as DisplayPort and doesnt interact with 3rd party devices."
I'm wondering, does the GPU in the Mac Pro even support 5k without multiple cords?
I think HDMI 1.4 and Displayport 1.2 both support 4k @60hz. The Dell 5k monitor needed 2xDP cables to work though. 5K definitely puts them in a strange spot for external monitor support. I'm interested to see how they solve the issue. Requiring two TB ports to run a monitor doesn't seem like a thing Apple would want to do. Especially if someone with a Mac Pro wants to run a dual monitor setup for work, then 4 ports would be used for monitors alone.