Apple calls MS.

Page 11 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Feb 19, 2001
20,155
23
81
I think no one realized that M$ shows the 13" MBP and then says "This Mac costs $2000."

1) The 15.4" MBP is no longer $2000
2) The 13" was never 2k to begin with and what 1199? $1499 for the upper end one?

The MBP I got was a ripoff in June 08.

$1999 base price with the $200 student discount. $200 for 4gb ram upgrade was a total rip, but it brought me back to $2000. Throw in the iPod which gets a rebate, I suppose you could argue my MBP came for $1700. I also got Apple Care which is BEYOND a RIPOFF. $269 I think? For a similar price you can probably get Dell 4 year accidental coverage where I can drop my laptop and get a whole new one.

Well whatever right?

MBP is sexy. It's a nice 15.4" form factor. When I game I still game on my PC. I can game on my MBP using boot camp but come on. 90% of my work like word processing, email, IM, ATOT, twitter, facebook can be done on my MBP. I can do some Photoshop too and webpage coding although it's not really the Mac itself that turns me off from it but rather the fact that I don't have a 27" LCD hooked up to my MBP and the keyboard. I'd rather do it on a desktop.

If you're one of those idiots who buy Apple products cuz it's SOOOO COOOL ZOMG then you deserve to be bashed, but honestly there's nothing wrong with running OS X. Especially when you have a solid PC to back it up (and an older laptop too on Windows).

I use OSX 99.9% of the time on my Mac. I go into Windows only to sync my Nokia N-Series only. Sometimes some Office 2k7 files don't read well on Mac Office 2k8 and maybe I'll pop into Windows.

Bottom line is my MBP was not worth whatever exorbitant price I got it for. I customized a Dell 15.4" XPS right after for $1300 from Slickdeals with features that surpassed my MBP unfortunately. But 5.4 lbs on a 15.4" laptop? With 5 hour battery life? Yes I know OSX uses some insane speed stepping and Vista/XP battery life is really terrible because it's only a 60 WHr battery but for OS X to achieve 5 hours is still VERY impressive.

I can't get that from any other laptop. So yeah I had the money. I dumped it on an Apple. Is it unique? Yeah. Is it worth the price? Probably not when you compare to other laptops, but you need to realize nothing else can really match it in such a form factor. This was why I argued for iPods over Zunes, Zens, Dell DJs, etc because there's no other MP3 player that just did it better on such a similar form factor. No MP3 player was as small or easy to use (come on click wheel > anything)

Back on topic: I think it's not as lame as Apple begging for MS as Dailytech says. It's somewhere in between the lines. Apple doesn't like false advertising and instead of whining to the FCC they ask MS if they could remove it or update their ads. After all M$ hasn't been airing that ad recently in these post WWDC days.
 

thescreensavers

Diamond Member
Aug 3, 2005
9,916
2
81
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: zerocool84
Originally posted by: ProfJohn

And then I have to deal with the typical PC headaches, virus software or just take the risk that I don't get one because I am a smart surfer etc etc.
:confused:

And now that Apple recommends one for Macs since they are suffering many virus' as well.
I have yet to see one or even hear of one.

I thought the whole Apple recommends one was just a software company trying to get some business??

I think Macs are safer because it is harder to get the files onto the computer and get them executed.

On a PC it is like "oh look a Jessica Alba sex tape!! cool" :click: "what the hell just happened to my machine?"

I had to totally reinstall Vista 3 times on my Dell due to stupid crap happening with drivers or one nasty virus. I also had all kinds of 'does not want to start" issues with the machine until I got Vista SP 1.

Again, on the Mac I have never had one major problem. Safari will die some times, but it seems that browsers die all the time due to web page makers pushing the envelop faster than the browsers makers. Those 'interactive' web ads were killing Safari till the latest upgrade.


Take out vista put Windows 7, see how that works for you. Its a complete different experience. There are tons of free apps for windows that mac just do not not have. Macs also do not have as big game list as windows but its increasing. It was unfortunate for you to have problems with your dell but Macs have issues as well. My friend has many Cd's stuck in his slot loading drive and had to get that fixed, he had a Hard drive fail on him..ect but he had really bad luck with any electronic device.
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
Dude... how much have you drunk tonight??

Your post is like:
The Mac sucks, but it is awesome, but then it sucks, but this part is awesome, but it sucks, but did I tell you how awesome my Mac is?
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
I probably should do Windows 7, but I am too lazy :)

About the only thing I use my PC for now is games and Microsoft Word and some times works spread sheets.

Everything else I do on my Mac
 

thescreensavers

Diamond Member
Aug 3, 2005
9,916
2
81
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Dude... how much have you drunk tonight??

Your post is like:
The Mac sucks, but it is awesome, but then it sucks, but this part is awesome, but it sucks, but did I tell you how awesome my Mac is?

nah just mixing pros and cons and shit, I really need to get to my paper due in a few hours LOL, damn Mac vs Windows threads!
 

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,213
12
81
Originally posted by: Deeko
Originally posted by: ProfJohn

Go to Dell or some other site and price out a laptop with the same specs as the MacBook Pro and get back to me.

Actually, I did that last year. I bought a fairly high end Dell XPS laptop (~$1650), and I did shop around. I put the same exact specs into a macbook pro (except a slower video card - they did not offer one as good as Dell's), and it was something along the lines of $2400.

PROFJOHN READ THIS

PROFJOHN READ THIS

PROFJOHN READ THIS

PROFJOHN READ THIS

PROFJOHN READ THIS

ok - you've ignored this when you cry about Lauren's unreasonable laptop choice. read my post, and shut the hell up. You're wrong, and despite your claims of "owning both", you're clearly a mindless fanboy.
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
Originally posted by: Deeko
Originally posted by: Deeko
Originally posted by: ProfJohn

Go to Dell or some other site and price out a laptop with the same specs as the MacBook Pro and get back to me.
Actually, I did that last year. I bought a fairly high end Dell XPS laptop (~$1650), and I did shop around. I put the same exact specs into a macbook pro (except a slower video card - they did not offer one as good as Dell's), and it was something along the lines of $2400.

PROFJOHN READ THIS

PROFJOHN READ THIS

PROFJOHN READ THIS

PROFJOHN READ THIS

PROFJOHN READ THIS

ok - you've ignored this when you cry about Lauren's unreasonable laptop choice. read my post, and shut the hell up. You're wrong, and despite your claims of "owning both", you're clearly a mindless fanboy.
I admit to being a fan boy.

But the fact that you admit to having to spend $1650 to get a computer with Specs similar to the $2400 Mac proves that the MS ad is bogus. Their $650 lap top is a piece of crap that is barely capable of running Vista.

Read what computerworld had to say about the ad and the HP
http://blogs.computerworld.com..._ballme#comment-134804
t is the epitome of what people dislike about PCs.

- It runs Vista Home on a slower AMD mobile processor. AMD makes some very good mobile processors, this one isn't at the top of the list.

From Best Buy's own review of this product:

Most of the systems in the Budget section of our Winter 2009 Retail Roundup (covering laptops from $600 to $899), have Intel's 2.0GHz Core 2 Duo T6400 CPU, but the HP dv7-1245dx was one of the few to use a 2.1GHz AMD Turion X2 Dual-Core RM-72. While we were able to use the dv7 for normal multitasking and media playback, the two AMD-powered systems in our lineup fell behind the pack in our benchmark tests.

- It has DDR2 RAM which is what $300 Netbooks run. This is the type of setup that sparked the "Made for Vista" lawsuits. Sure, DDR3 RAM is new and slightly more expensive but why buy older technology?

- The screen is abysmal. One reviewer said this model series "has the worst screen I have ever seen in my life. It's the 1440x900 screen and the viewing angles are so poor that even when sitting directly eye level with the screen it is totally washed out. If I go a little bit off-axis the screen results in a negative image. I was using the default settings. Unfortunately I didn't read reviews before i purchased." Ouch!

- It is loaded up with trial crapware and trial antivirus software that will need to be purchased or wiped offf the machine. Most people prefer to just format the drive and start with a fresh install of Windows (XP or 7).

- The networking is five years old. 802.11G wireless and 100Mb Ethernet are surpassed by $300 Netbooks. 2004 called. It wants its motherboard back.

- The battery is said to last 2.5 hours. Real world usage on all laptops is always close to around half of that. That likely means you can't watch a full movie on a battery charge. It also means that it will probably poop out on that commuter flight from Los Angeles to San Francisco.

- The thing is almost two inches thick and weighs in at almost eight pounds. Do you think that PC buyer wants to be hauling that thing around? She didn't look like she spend her afternoons pumping iron on Venice Beach.

And, after all, this machine is a piece of ... hardware. Microsoft makes software. You could just as easily throw Linux on that laptop - or even Mac OS with the Hackintosh hack.

Again, the takeway is that Microsoft will install their software on an extremely shoddy computer.

And this poor girl, the actress that Microsoft hired to play a person who is not an actress, is going to get a heavy, bulky slow Vista Home machine with a poor display, old networking equipment and weak battery loaded up with crapware.
And yet you watch the ad and act as if MS is making a good point??

BTW if you step down to the 15" laptop then the Mac becomes far more competitive.
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
60,012
10,505
126
Originally posted by: ProfJohn

And yet you watch the ad and act as if MS is making a good point??

BTW if you step down to the 15" laptop then the Mac becomes far more competitive.

The Lenovo I got in 07 for $550 runs Vista great. My only complaint with it was the screen resolution. It tended to look a little chunky with certain fonts. I expect that with a lower end laptop though, and I definitely can deal with it at that price.
 

abaez

Diamond Member
Jan 28, 2000
7,155
1
81
Originally posted by: ProfJohn

I admit to being a fan boy.

But the fact that you admit to having to spend $1650 to get a computer with Specs similar to the $2400 Mac proves that the MS ad is bogus. Their $650 lap top is a piece of crap that is barely capable of running Vista.

Read what computerworld had to say about the ad and the HP
http://blogs.computerworld.com..._ballme#comment-134804

So the actual model used in the commercial is crap, but don't try to think you can't find another model that poos all over your argument:

Originally posted by: jpeyton
Someone walks into Best Buy, wanting a laptop that fulfills the following requirements:

17" screen
2GHz+ Intel Core 2 Duo
4GB RAM
320GB HDD
WiFi-N
DVDRW
Webcam

Anything above and beyond that is gravy, but they want at least those minimum specs at the lowest price.

What do they find?

PC: HP G70 $699.99

Apple: MacBook Pro 17" $2499.99
 

Fayd

Diamond Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,970
2
76
www.manwhoring.com
Originally posted by: SunnyD
If it's true, I'm impressed. A marketing campaign Microsoft finally got right (note, not an Apple fan/zealot, but you have to admit most of Microsoft's marketing just plain sucks - Bing? for example)

i was under the impression bing was a test. its search functionality to be included in next gen msn.com when it gets tweaked, or something.
 

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,213
12
81
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
I admit to being a fan boy.

But the fact that you admit to having to spend $1650 to get a computer with Specs similar to the $2400 Mac proves that the MS ad is bogus. Their $650 lap top is a piece of crap that is barely capable of running Vista.

What? The ad doesn't say a $650 PC is the same as a $2000 macbook - just that you can get a $650 PC that does what you want, and you can't do that with mac.

Also, for the record, I just purchased an HP laptop two weeks ago. It was $800 after rebate. It has Vista Home Premium and runs it plenty well. It has a core 2 duo, 4GB of RAM, a 500GB hard drive. Yet another example that you can absolutely get a good PC at a reasonable price. Just for kicks, I just added the same specs into Apple: $1299. Same hardware, 61.5% the price. An even lower price ratio than the example from last year.
 

reallyscrued

Platinum Member
Jul 28, 2004
2,618
5
81
Originally posted by: Ns1


Would I EVER pay MSRP for a MacBook? FUCK NO. But 400 off a 1500 laptop makes my macbook FAR superior to anything in it's equivalent price range IMHO

I personally find Apple laptops to be far superior.

How would you know what's superior to what? You said earlier you didn't even look at the specs, you said you just found something that you liked and ran off with it. (Seems to be the mentality of most casual Mac users.)

And Apple laptops to be far superior to WHAT? NEWS FLASH to everyone in this thread. Microsoft doesn't fucking make laptops. You comparing them to Dell? HP/Compaq? Lenovo? Falcon Northwest?

Casual Mac users are idiots. At any given price point, you can always, always, always do more for your money by buying something with a Microsoft base. (Assuming you're not rendering CGI movies for pixar.)

Although, if you got money to burn, hell, by all means go ahead. This is America after all isn't it? All I know is my M1330 is fucking doing great for office/school apps since I bought it a year ago for 750 bucks and my $500 gaming rig can play pretty much ever game out there. That's like two machines for the price of one decent Apple laptop, and I'd argue I get way more functionality than you can.


Edit: About the commercials though, they are both flawed and pretty much nonsense. I wish Microsoft would've taken the high road and never even produced commercials to get back at Apple. I didn't even get the one with Jerry Seinfeld and Gates, at first I thought they were promoting a new sitcom.
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
Apple said Tuesday that third-quarter profits rose nearly 15 percent to $1.23 billion, or $1.35 per diluted share, on record non-holiday quarter sales of $8.34 billion for the three-month period ended June 27, 2009.

These results compare to revenue of $7.46 billion and net quarterly profit of $1.07 billion, or $1.19 per diluted share, in the year-ago quarter. Gross margin was 36.3 percent, up from 34.8 percent in the year-ago quarter. International sales accounted for 44 percent of the quarter's revenue.

Apple sold 2.6 million Macs during the quarter, representing a four percent unit increase over the year-ago quarter and the best ever June quarter in its history for personal computer sales. The company also sold 10.2 million iPods during the quarter, representing a seven percent unit decline from the year-ago quarter. Quarterly iPhones sold were 5.2 million, representing 626 percent unit growth over the year-ago quarter.
vs.
Software behemoth Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) said late Thursday that its fiscal fourth quarter profit fell 29%, as sluggish PC sales amid the economic recession contributed to sharply lower software sales.

The Redmond, Washington-based company reported fiscal fourth quarter net income of $3.05 billion, or 34 cents per share, down from $4.3 billion, or 46 cents per share, in the year-ago period. Excluding various special one-time items, Microsoft saw adjusted profits of 38 cents per share.

Revenue fell 17% percent to $13.1 billion in the fiscal fourth quarter.
Is there anything else to say?
 

Parasitic

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2002
4,000
2
0
Originally posted by: reallyscrued
And Apple laptops to be far superior to WHAT? NEWS FLASH to everyone in this thread. Microsoft doesn't fucking make laptops. You comparing them to Dell? HP/Compaq? Lenovo? Falcon Northwest?

...


Edit: About the commercials though, they are both flawed and pretty much nonsense. I wish Microsoft would've taken the high road and never even produced commercials to get back at Apple. I didn't even get the one with Jerry Seinfeld and Gates, at first I thought they were promoting a new sitcom.

Those are exactly my sentiments when I see those ads. First time I saw it, my immediate reaction was "WTF, why is Microsoft spending money and shooting ads to help OEMs sell more laptops?" I can't even recall the last time Microsoft aired commercials for X-box, Office, Windows, Visual Studio, etc... At this point they're still by majority a software company, so when are they going to act like one and fix the fundamental issues plaguing their products? Why haven't they done PR damage control on Vista? Why haven't they aired ads touting Office Suite's superiority in dominating the business WORLD? Why haven't they produced ads that reaffirm their place in computing?

And those of you complaining about how Apple is overpriced and underpowered...don't forget, they must be doing something right if they can manage to score 91% marketshare in laptops over $1000 last month (88% in May) and sell enough iPhones to hit a major nerve of RIM's. It's hard to argue that most Mac buyers are ideological blind fad followers with too much money with that kind of data, especially in a recession.

And non-Apple computers aren't always cheaper than Macs, as some have already pointed out. Another example: Dell Adamo vs. Macbook Air. 1.4GHz C2D at $2200 vs. 2.13GHz at $1800. Sony also has quite a few 13-inchers with hefty starting stickers. A similarly spec'ed HP IQ800t all-in-one is $150 more than a 24" iMac (albeit the HP has a slightly larger screen at the same res and 9300M GS vs. iMac's 9400M integrated solutions; well, and touch-screen too, I guess, but it is $150 more than the iMac). While we're at it, HP's 22" all-in-one is $70 more than the 20" iMac (once again, same differences as outlined in the 25.5").

Edit: p.s., Delirium, you can modify Series 60 plugins so you can sync your N-series phones with iSync. If that's the only thing left you do in Windows besides Office 2007 incompatibilities hopefully now you won't have to reboot every so often.
 

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,213
12
81
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Apple said Tuesday that third-quarter profits rose nearly 15 percent to $1.23 billion, or $1.35 per diluted share, on record non-holiday quarter sales of $8.34 billion for the three-month period ended June 27, 2009.

These results compare to revenue of $7.46 billion and net quarterly profit of $1.07 billion, or $1.19 per diluted share, in the year-ago quarter. Gross margin was 36.3 percent, up from 34.8 percent in the year-ago quarter. International sales accounted for 44 percent of the quarter's revenue.

Apple sold 2.6 million Macs during the quarter, representing a four percent unit increase over the year-ago quarter and the best ever June quarter in its history for personal computer sales. The company also sold 10.2 million iPods during the quarter, representing a seven percent unit decline from the year-ago quarter. Quarterly iPhones sold were 5.2 million, representing 626 percent unit growth over the year-ago quarter.
vs.
Software behemoth Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) said late Thursday that its fiscal fourth quarter profit fell 29%, as sluggish PC sales amid the economic recession contributed to sharply lower software sales.

The Redmond, Washington-based company reported fiscal fourth quarter net income of $3.05 billion, or 34 cents per share, down from $4.3 billion, or 46 cents per share, in the year-ago period. Excluding various special one-time items, Microsoft saw adjusted profits of 38 cents per share.

Revenue fell 17% percent to $13.1 billion in the fiscal fourth quarter.
Is there anything else to say?

Uhh - so despite not horrifically overpricing everything, and suffering a severe 29% profit drop, and STILL profited almost $2 billion more? In one of the worst quarters in company history? You're right - there's nothing else to say. Even at their worst, they are dominating Apple in terms of total profits, when Apple is at their best.

Also, don't forget that this fall Microsoft has several very large product releases. Windows 7 is getting rave reviews everywhere, Windows Mobile 6.5 is not their mobile savior (WM 7 next year has a better shot at that) but it will still sell big, and Windows Azure will likely prove a cash cow.

Its cute that again you ignored my post about laptops, though. All you are proving is what many people here are saying - many Apple customers are dumb as rocks and are willing to far overspend for their products. Hence their profit margins. Kudos to the Apple marketing team - they make dishonest ads over hyping their mediocre products, causing drones to far overspend on them. Its a special kind of genius, really.

edit: by the way - a 4 percent increase in macs? I'll ignore the decline in ipods and increase in iphones because it is irrelevant to this thread. A 4 percent increase in macs sold? That's not that impressive. That is a net increase of what - .001% in mac marketshare? Maybe those dishonest commercials aren't so great after all.
 

Parasitic

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2002
4,000
2
0
Originally posted by: Deeko
Uhh - so despite not horrifically overpricing everything, and suffering a severe 29% profit drop, and STILL profited almost $2 billion more? In one of the worst quarters in company history? You're right - there's nothing else to say. Even at their worst, they are dominating Apple in terms of total profits, when Apple is at their best.

Also, don't forget that this fall Microsoft has several very large product releases. Windows 7 is getting rave reviews everywhere, Windows Mobile 6.5 is not their mobile savior (WM 7 next year has a better shot at that) but it will still sell big, and Windows Azure will likely prove a cash cow.

Its cute that again you ignored my post about laptops, though. All you are proving is what many people here are saying - many Apple customers are dumb as rocks and are willing to far overspend for their products. Hence their profit margins. Kudos to the Apple marketing team - they make dishonest ads over hyping their mediocre products, causing drones to far overspend on them. Its a special kind of genius, really.

Apple's marketshare globally is less than 10%, while Microsoft's potential marketshare can be as high as 90-100% (after all, you can install Microsoft products on anything that runs Windows or OSX, and just about almost every computer can run Windows). The economies of scale are different. What you're saying would be like comparing McDonald's vs. Jack-in-the-Box in sales. While McDonald's can suffer a loss in profit margin, it's still most likely to be more profitable than Jack-in-the-box because its bigger footprint in the world.
 

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,213
12
81
Yes - I understand that. My point is that yea, Apple has great profit margins, for the EXACT reason people denounce their products in this thread - but in the end, even at their very worst, Microsoft still dominates them.

By the way, I was reading just this week that Microsoft has a 96% share of the business OS share. That should be pretty telling to the true value and cost/benefit ratio.
 

Parasitic

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2002
4,000
2
0
Originally posted by: Deeko
Yes - I understand that. My point is that yea, Apple has great profit margins, for the EXACT reason people denounce their products in this thread - but in the end, even at their very worst, Microsoft still dominates them.

By the way, I was reading just this week that Microsoft has a 96% share of the business OS share. That should be pretty telling to the true value and cost/benefit ratio.

Because of this, I really think Microsoft's making these ads for the wrong reason. They're settling into a panic mode while they really should be listening to what customers want and patching up their PR image.


Simplify their Windows offerings. No need for 7 editions when others can get by with maybe 2 or 3 (OSX, Linux, etc).
Add unicode support to Zune and expand marketplace libraries.
Aggressive marketing campaigns in their gaming and multimedia division.
Actually spend time looking into making Vista less of a PR nightmare now that SP2 is out.
etc etc. The list goes on.
 

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,213
12
81
Regarding Vista - yea, Vista was a PR nightmare. However, why fix the PR involving Vista when they have Windows 7 waiting? Windows 7 is getting rave reviews - a lot of businesses still running XP that refused to upgrade to Vista are lining up to get it. user testing has been very positive. Its everything Vista was not in that regard. And I would say XBox has pretty good marketing, and is doing pretty damn well. As a PS3 owner, i grudgingly admit that XBox is dominating Sony.

Anyway, regarding these ads, I think they are helping to patch up their image. Apple marketing paints Windows (or "PC" in order to get away with false advertising) as slow, old, bumbling, etc. The new Microsoft commercials paint Windows as affordable, cost effective, and what consumers need. Which is a great image to have during an economic downturn, if you ask me.
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
Originally posted by: Deeko
Uhh - so despite not horrifically overpricing everything, and suffering a severe 29% profit drop, and STILL profited almost $2 billion more? In one of the worst quarters in company history? You're right - there's nothing else to say. Even at their worst, they are dominating Apple in terms of total profits, when Apple is at their best.
Really now... do the math.

Apple: $1.2B profit on $8.3B in sales for a 14% profit margin.

MS: $3B profit on $13.1b in sales for a 22% profit margin.

Which company is over pricing its products?

BTW
But Liddell said the rest of the calendar year, at least, will be difficult for Microsoft. That's because the software maker's success is tethered to the PC industry, which is expected to sell fewer computers this year than last ? the first such decline since 2001.
So Apple is experience sales growth while the overall industry expects to sell fewer computers than last year.

Deeko, I have both a PC and two Macs. They both have their plusses and minuses. There is no doubt at all that you can get a PC for cheaper than a Mac, especially on the desktop side. There is also no doubt, in my mind, that a Mac is a better computer for casual users. iPhoto, iMovie and iWeb give causal users all the tools they need to make high quality photos, movies and web sites right out of the box. On a PC you would have to spend decent amount of money to get all that software and it just isn't going to work together as well as the Mac software does.

If you are a power user or a gamer then get a PC. But if your 60 year old mom calls and says she wants a computer to share pics and stuff with her friends get her a Mac.
 

OCGuy

Lifer
Jul 12, 2000
27,224
37
91
Originally posted by: ProfJohn

If you are a power user or a gamer then get a PC. But if your 60 year old mom calls and says she wants a computer to share pics and stuff with her friends get her a Mac.

Never.
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
Originally posted by: Deeko
Anyway, regarding these ads, I think they are helping to patch up their image. Apple marketing paints Windows (or "PC" in order to get away with false advertising) as slow, old, bumbling, etc. The new Microsoft commercials paint Windows as affordable, cost effective, and what consumers need. Which is a great image to have during an economic downturn, if you ask me.
I think both ad campaigns are very good.

They both hit the competition where it is weakest.

PCs are prone to crashing and viruses etc.
Macs are expensive.

Two of the best run companies in the world are hitting each other where it hurts. It is like watching Ali and Frazier go at it.