Apparently CBS execs OK'd the Janet bewbie thing...

Page 24 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Dexion

Golden Member
Apr 30, 2000
1,591
0
76
I have made my comment...it was an ACT! Jesus H. Fvcking Christ on a popsicle stick you're dense!

Dense? I'm actually posing more theories here, and your the one not even commenting or even considering the opinions I bring up. Dense?

And, for the bra, I've seen the close-up HDTV screen caps. There isn't a shred of a thread leftover.

Where were you looking? on the piece in Justin's hand? or from Janet's wardrobe? Neither would show and threads if it were to break. It won't be like threads from a T-shirt, ever tried ripping the rubber strap for your Jockey's? There won't be any long threads since they are made of rubber. Besides, bras are like 10x more thin and fragile, especially the bikini tops. The exposed part of the piece of bra/clothes in Justin's hand is actually the top part of her bra where the red lace was, not at the point of where it broke. So you won't see it. And if you were looking at her breast, I mentioned it before...

 

Dexion

Golden Member
Apr 30, 2000
1,591
0
76
The purpose was to one-up Britney/Madonna for the kiss. The "surprised" look was part of the act.

That's a lame purpose. I don't think celebrities play games this stupid.

part of what act? To act really shocked and as if they didn't know what happened? yet they planned it? Doesn't make any sense at all. It could be true that it was a publicity stunt, but it looks like it's more damaging to their reputations more than anything. I think being experienced "entertainers" they must know that things like this could break their careers or image.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: Dexion
The purpose was to one-up Britney/Madonna for the kiss. The "surprised" look was part of the act.

That's a lame purpose. I don't think celebrities play games this stupid.

Wow...dense *and* naive.

part of what act? To act really shocked and as if they didn't know what happened? yet they planned it? Doesn't make any sense at all. It could be true that it was a publicity stunt, but it looks like it's more damaging to their reputations more than anything. I think being experienced "entertainers" they must know that things like this could break their careers or image.

It makes perfect sense. Jackson hasn't release an album in some time and had one coming out this week. Gee...let's see...

 

Dexion

Golden Member
Apr 30, 2000
1,591
0
76
Wow...dense *and* naive.

Wow... Arrogant *and* repugnant.

You realize that you haven't made a single meaningful comment this whole conversation. Your just resulting to name-calling like "dense" & "HOLY F*KIN Christ" just because you can't prove my opinions wrong. It could be true that Janet and Timberlake has actually planned it this way, but all your saying doesn't allow me to believe so. Your obviously not a very strong debater, so I'll leave your name-calling and I'll wait for someone to actually make a real statement or comment.

I really believe I have brought something to everyone's attention and that whatever Janet and Justin did was not what they intended. There are 2 possible reasons here but you fail to acknowledge it as a possibility.
 

Lizardman

Golden Member
Jul 23, 2001
1,990
0
0
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Dexion
It was planned. Obvious as hell.

PLanned yes, but not the breast part. What's your take on the questions I pose then?

All planned. The looks and everything.

And, again, ever known a bra to tear so easily? :confused:

And the news on Extra! that Janet sent an assistant out 2 days before the Super Bowl to but those nipple shields?

There sexuality is inevitable help them embrace it, before it becomes awkward.
I think its better for kids to see sex on tv then to see old war footage from WWII of starving Jewish people in Germany and the Mounds of bodies that were buried.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: Lizardman

There sexuality is inevitable help them embrace it, before it becomes awkward.
I think its better for kids to see sex on tv then to see old war footage from WWII of starving Jewish people in Germany and the Mounds of bodies that were buried.

Apparently, you're not a parent.

I definitely do not want my nine year-old daughter seeing a man rip a woman's clothing off in public.
 

Dexion

Golden Member
Apr 30, 2000
1,591
0
76
You have much to learn about the business of media companies.

And from what company or background do you come from? If your in the business then you have more ground than I, if not, then your opinion holds very little weight, if any at all.
 

Dexion

Golden Member
Apr 30, 2000
1,591
0
76
There sexuality is inevitable help them embrace it, before it becomes awkward.
I think its better for kids to see sex on tv then to see old war footage from WWII of starving Jewish people in Germany and the Mounds of bodies that were buried.

I second that. All the images, comments, prejudices and violent motives superimposed on Iraq and Iraqi people recently was 100s of times more damaging to children.
 

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,928
143
106
Originally posted by: Dexion
I have made my comment...it was an ACT! Jesus H. Fvcking Christ on a popsicle stick you're dense!

Dense? I'm actually posing more theories here, and your the one not even commenting or even considering the opinions I bring up. Dense?

And, for the bra, I've seen the close-up HDTV screen caps. There isn't a shred of a thread leftover.

Where were you looking? on the piece in Justin's hand? or from Janet's wardrobe? Neither would show and threads if it were to break. It won't be like threads from a T-shirt, ever tried ripping the rubber strap for your Jockey's? There won't be any long threads since they are made of rubber. Besides, bras are like 10x more thin and fragile, especially the bikini tops. The exposed part of the piece of bra/clothes in Justin's hand is actually the top part of her bra where the red lace was, not at the point of where it broke. So you won't see it. And if you were looking at her breast, I mentioned it before...

You have got to be a chimp to think that this wasn't planned... Furthermore, have you ever touched a girl's bra? Seen one? Even felt a real b00b (off the subject BUT probably true as well!)... No way in hell Timberflake pulled hard enough to rip it *clean* off. If anything, it would have yanked on the other side and brought *both* sides down. Think about it for a second, go up to mommy's room, and stand on one side of the bra. Pull as hard as Justin did.

You will be shocked at how gullible u are and how blindly you've been disillusioned by 2 attention whores.

 

Dexion

Golden Member
Apr 30, 2000
1,591
0
76
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: Dexion
I have made my comment...it was an ACT! Jesus H. Fvcking Christ on a popsicle stick you're dense!

Dense? I'm actually posing more theories here, and your the one not even commenting or even considering the opinions I bring up. Dense?

And, for the bra, I've seen the close-up HDTV screen caps. There isn't a shred of a thread leftover.

Where were you looking? on the piece in Justin's hand? or from Janet's wardrobe? Neither would show and threads if it were to break. It won't be like threads from a T-shirt, ever tried ripping the rubber strap for your Jockey's? There won't be any long threads since they are made of rubber. Besides, bras are like 10x more thin and fragile, especially the bikini tops. The exposed part of the piece of bra/clothes in Justin's hand is actually the top part of her bra where the red lace was, not at the point of where it broke. So you won't see it. And if you were looking at her breast, I mentioned it before...

You have got to be a chimp to think that this wasn't planned... Furthermore, have you ever touched a girl's bra? Seen one? Even felt a real b00b (off the subject BUT probably true as well!)... No way in hell Timberflake pulled hard enough to rip it *clean* off. If anything, it would have yanked on the other side and brought *both* sides down. Think about it for a second, go up to mommy's room, and stand on one side of the bra. Pull as hard as Justin did.

You will be shocked at how gullible u are and how blindly you've been disillusioned by 2 attention whores.

Man can you guys only bash me harder for trying to believe their story just a bit? If I grab my mommy's bra, of course it wouldn't rip like it did. Obviously there must have been something majorly wrong with it to begin with. Either her funky leather suit had some metal in the middle(I wouldn't be surprised cuz it looks like it's squeezing her breasts out) or it's some super fragile sh!tty bra. But so what? What I'm saying is that yes I may be trekking on shakey ground and you guys might be right, but you still haven't really commented as to why they had this distressed look all over their faces when it happened.

Yeah, you guys tell me that it's an act. I don't think anyone can act that reaction and face gesture the way Justin did.

Tell me, why cover up her breast when it was just hanging out for like 3 secs on stage? If this WAS an act, it should have been much more extreme then it ended up. Like her whole top coming off exposing both breasts. Why just a little peak at it?

I dunno guys, you say I'm gullible, but I can say you guys are really gullible in believing what the media says.
 

plastick

Golden Member
Sep 29, 2003
1,400
1
81
I just signed into msn a minute ago and I see they are still talking about about Jannet Jackson's flash..
WHO CARES!!!!!!!!!!!!! Geeze! Its just another tit!!!!!!!!!!! And its not like her boob was completely bare!
Why is this worth the media talking about so long for?!

 

shimsham

Lifer
May 9, 2002
10,765
0
0
Originally posted by: plastick
I just signed into msn a minute ago and I see they are still talking about about Jannet Jackson's flash..
WHO CARES!!!!!!!!!!!!! Geeze! Its just another tit!!!!!!!!!!! And its not like her boob was completely bare!
Why is this worth the media talking about so long for?!

because they could fine every station that broadcast it, totaling a massive amount of money. it could also have an influence on future FCC regulations. its not often something like this happens, and the media beats everything into the ground.

its not impossible it was an accident, but its so laughably improbable that i cant imagine how anyone could think it wasnt planned. come on....new cd. JJ has been out of the spot light (at least that i am aware of, tho i dont follow these things) for some time, and has to compete with the likes of christina aguilera and britney. she has to show that shes just as "sexy" as they are if she has any hopes of her album going 20 platinum like the execs expect it to. just seems obvious.



 

It's amazing how fast they put together a team to investigate this.

But it takes over 2 years to even begin to form a team to investiage US intellgence holes.

Incredibly sad state of affairs. America cares more about its worthless shite hollywood performers than its political standing.
 

plastick

Golden Member
Sep 29, 2003
1,400
1
81
Originally posted by: SampSon

Incredibly sad state of affairs. America cares more about its worthless shite hollywood performers than its political standing.

yup.
 

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,928
143
106
Originally posted by: plastick
I just signed into msn a minute ago and I see they are still talking about about Jannet Jackson's flash..
WHO CARES!!!!!!!!!!!!! Geeze! Its just another tit!!!!!!!!!!! And its not like her boob was completely bare!
Why is this worth the media talking about so long for?!

It's a T!T that cancelled the Pro Bowl halftime show by the NFL with JC (whoever tf that is), because he had female backup dancers and the song he was singing talked about "relationships". The Grammy's got the 7 second delay because of it. The largest fine in FCC history will be levied because of it. That's why it's worth it.

 

plastick

Golden Member
Sep 29, 2003
1,400
1
81
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: plastick
I just signed into msn a minute ago and I see they are still talking about about Jannet Jackson's flash..
WHO CARES!!!!!!!!!!!!! Geeze! Its just another tit!!!!!!!!!!! And its not like her boob was completely bare!
Why is this worth the media talking about so long for?!

It's a T!T that cancelled the Pro Bowl halftime show by the NFL with JC (whoever tf that is), because he had female backup dancers and the song he was singing talked about "relationships". The Grammy's got the 7 second delay because of it. The largest fine in FCC history will be levied because of it. That's why it's worth it.

OOOH. I see. wow.

btw, where did you get your sig?

 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: plastick


btw, where did you get your sig?

fwiw, it's from René Descartes. Remember reading some of him in 4th year French in high school. ;)