lxskllr
No Lifer
- Nov 30, 2004
- 60,045
- 10,533
- 126
A lot of gnu/linux comes down to need and personal taste. You mentioned the package manager. That's kind of a big deal. That's your main interaction with updating the system. Debian prioritizes libre software, but doesn't make it needlessly hard to to install proprietary software. If you accept the default install, you'll have an all libre system. It's also for people that just want a system that works, and aren't constantly chasing the latest packages. For better AND worse, when you install debian, that's all you're gonna get til the next release. You only get security updates. That also means trivial programs sometimes break, and they will not be fixed. If you really want them, you'll have to do some tricks to get them working.[ rpm package manager isn't that intuitively easy compared to apt(-get, -cache, -file) and the storage of .rpm packages is more distributed, compared to /var/cache, but with snap introduction to Ubuntu (otherwise .deb packages) that changed for the maintaining/storage efficiency part(?), what's an advantage towards Debian (e.g. Bookworm, Trixie), from my POV. (thx) ]
Biggest downside is your system will pretty much always be out of date. Debian is glacial. Your security is handled with priority, but everything else happens when it happens. Some people run testing or unstable as a pseudo rolling release, but that isn't what those branches are for, and they really aren't rolling releases. You have to watch updates like a hawk or your system can/will get eaten. Blindly running apt update && apt upgrade will inevitably lead to pain.
Debian suits me philosophically, and it suits my nature(conservative). Only you can answer if it's the distro for you.