Even @ 17k miles/year on any of these cars you're missing the forest for the trees if you care much about $800/year difference in fuel (17 vs 21 mpg @ $4/gallon). Maintenance, repairs, depreciation will be many thousands/year on any of them, especially piling commuter miles onto there. Five years and 85k more miles either of these will be worth but a shadow of their former self.One thing I didn't know about the new S4 is the insane MPG it gets...up to 28 highway.
That 3.9 0-60 time of the CTS-V is still enticing, but in real-world mileage even with the MTM ECU on the S4; I'd be looking at 17-18MPG vs 21-23MPG, but .7 seconds slower.
I am not crazy about the new S4 dash, but I am going to go do a test drive when I get some time.
The main sticker on the CTS-V is the mileage and I need to see how the rear seat folds down. I didn't know it's not the same as the standard CTS.
Anyone know if it's like the CTS-V coupe?
Even @ 17k miles/year on any of these cars you're missing the forest for the trees if you care much about $800/year difference in fuel (17 vs 21 mpg @ $4/gallon). Maintenance, repairs, depreciation will be many thousands/year on any of them, especially piling commuter miles onto there.
This is IF you actually believe he will buy any of the cars he has mentioned.
I think it's likely he will hem and haw for months like a little school girl trying to decide between Bieber or the Jonas Brothers. Then in the end, he'll pick something like a Honda.
He's already done that with his wife's car; going from Audi to a Mazda. And he hasn't even bought the Mazda yet.
In reality I was being a bit optimistic on the CTS-V and conservative on the S4. Either way you slice it $100 roughly different in gas costs per month which also has the secondary impact of having to stop for gas much more. My driving level will be more like 25,000 miles per year.
Depreciation is not really a concern. I really don't worry about it as I consider a car a consumable.
Still low car cost vs high car cost, $250 is a serious chunk of change each month.
Just wait till you have to start maintaining these cars if you're worried about $250.
Just wait till you have to start maintaining these cars if you're worried about $250.
Exactly, once out of warranty budgeting $250/month for repairs alone probably isn't too unrealistic, even a tad low perhaps. $3000 per year for repairs on a halo car is nothing, especially at 25,000 miles a year minimum.
???? outside the CTS-V (which even then...) none of these are HALO cars.
I was referring to the V, which is a halo car. It's the top model Caddy.
Here we go with the negative bullshit, you make a statement, people comment on your statement and you go full negative.
"$250 is a serious chunk of change each month." - Those are your words, if you think that's a "serious chunk of change" then you really shouldn't consider purchasing any of these cars. Fact.
I'm done with your stupid never-materializing purchase threads.
lol dude, you are trying way too hard now.
I am well aware of the maintenance schedules of the cars I am looking at.
It doesn't change the fact that from top to bottom I am not looking at only a $250 difference in monthly payment, but a $150 difference in fuel cost as well.
Both those numbers are significant to just about anyone as a monthly recurring cost.
I am not 'worried' about it, it's one of the various criteria that should be considered. Insurance costs are another. Two similar cars can have very different costs.
I would beg to differ. An RS4 or CTS-V is not marketed toward people who think $250 a month is a big deal. I'm trying too hard...at what exactly? I wasn't aware I have beeng trying at anything other than to tell you that $250 a month is normal over the course of a year for maintenance/repairs on a car in the range you are looking at. If a few hundred dollars a month is swaying you on which if these "baller" cars you should buy...maybe you should be looking at something a little more reasonable like the Charger you had previously mentioned.
Heck, the Michelin PS2's that come standard on the M3 often wear out before 15K if you are driving the car the way it should be driven. You could potentially be replacing them nearly twice a year. There's at least $200 a month right there.
You are basically claiming that a $15,000 difference in car price is not a consideration. You are indeed trying too hard speaking at a level you simply do not understand AT ALL.
Also that's another $250 per month on TOP of everything else that needs to be considered.
I am not SET on any of these vehicles and hence why my post asking for feedback...they each offer their own set of pros and cons and fall in the same 'budget' I have for a car each month.
I am also well aware of Michelin PS2s and also the previous Goodyear Asymmetrics which I am already used to replacing at every 10k. AFAIK the PS2 is a 20k mile tire and most do get closer to that outside of aggressive alignment specs and constant burnouts.
However, don't worry your little heart over this...like I mentioned I know the maintenance schedules, I know my yearly mileage and the costs that go with that, I have insurance quotes, etc...I am looking for the driving characteristics...not a bunch of children saying "neener neener neener you are a liar liar liar!"
Get a life.
Clearly by your own arguments 'anyone' that can afford these cars shouldn't care about racking up the miles on one. :awe:
LOL, yeah RS4 and the M3 are just too harsh for the highways here in Florida.
That's lollerskates even.
S. Florida has some of the smoothest roads in the whole nation.
I don't think you understand the thread you are posting in. I am not looking for a separate commuter nor need a Buick.
You bought anything yet or you still talking smack and magazine racing us all?
$250 is chump change each month![]()