On 5/20 a massive hail storm blew through. Hail up to 2.5" reported in the village. I personally saw up to golf ball sized hail. I was home during the storm.
I have State Farm Insurance. I had 2 claims on my old house that they had no issue paying out on in 2006 (roof) and again in 2008 (basement).
Initially I didn't think there was any damage but then I started to notice things like lots of dents in the fascia, gutters, roof vents, damaged screens, garage doors, fence, and tons of loose roofing granules, etc.
On 5/23 I filed a claim with SF. Earliest I can get an adjuster is 5/31.
In the meantime I go on the roof and can see damage. Particularly on the front of my roof tons of granules got knocked off. My front gutters are full and my downspout extensions (replaced 1 week prior) and parts of my yard are loaded with granules. I can see some definite hits. I can really only check the front (was where the storm primarily hit anyway) and some of the sides as the back and outer sides are too steep.
On 5/24 I have my first contractor out to inspect the roof. He takes lots of photos and highlights hail bruising with chalk and shows me the damage he found. He says there's clearly enough damage for SF to total the roof.
5/31 SF adjuster comes out. He notes all of the clear damage to the metals (fascia, gutters, etc.) screens, yard lights, etc. He also notes that all of my roof vents and power attic fan is hail damaged. But when it comes to the roof he says "there's no hail damage". He then goes on to say that there is hail damage but it's "old" damage and not covered. It also seemed to me like he cherry picked the areas to photograph because he ignored the small front slope with the most damage and took photos of the side slopes with less damage.
I had my roof inspected in 2012 when I bought the house and again in 2013 when I had some chimney work done. Neither one saw any hail damage. Now all of a sudden I have "old" hail damage?
I'm going to have some additional contractors out but so far SF is not willing to pay out on the roof. The damage they agree to is less than my deductible. If they all ID hail damage without me telling them, then I'm going to have to lawyer up I guess.
I'm planning on selling in the next 1-3 years and I won't be able to sell the house with a damaged roof. Rough estimate out of pocket would be 10-12K for a full replacement. Just the loss of granules alone over the whole roof had to severely hurt it's longevity.
Anyone ever contest insurance company findings and win?
https://www.flickr.com/photos/jjr329/sets/72157644574687689/
Cliffs
Hail hits house and causes damage
Claim filed
Contractor says roof should be replaced as well as metals, screens, etc...
SF adjuster finds some damage but only the cheaper stuff and total is within my deductible.
Can I fight and win?
I have State Farm Insurance. I had 2 claims on my old house that they had no issue paying out on in 2006 (roof) and again in 2008 (basement).
Initially I didn't think there was any damage but then I started to notice things like lots of dents in the fascia, gutters, roof vents, damaged screens, garage doors, fence, and tons of loose roofing granules, etc.
On 5/23 I filed a claim with SF. Earliest I can get an adjuster is 5/31.
In the meantime I go on the roof and can see damage. Particularly on the front of my roof tons of granules got knocked off. My front gutters are full and my downspout extensions (replaced 1 week prior) and parts of my yard are loaded with granules. I can see some definite hits. I can really only check the front (was where the storm primarily hit anyway) and some of the sides as the back and outer sides are too steep.
On 5/24 I have my first contractor out to inspect the roof. He takes lots of photos and highlights hail bruising with chalk and shows me the damage he found. He says there's clearly enough damage for SF to total the roof.
5/31 SF adjuster comes out. He notes all of the clear damage to the metals (fascia, gutters, etc.) screens, yard lights, etc. He also notes that all of my roof vents and power attic fan is hail damaged. But when it comes to the roof he says "there's no hail damage". He then goes on to say that there is hail damage but it's "old" damage and not covered. It also seemed to me like he cherry picked the areas to photograph because he ignored the small front slope with the most damage and took photos of the side slopes with less damage.
I had my roof inspected in 2012 when I bought the house and again in 2013 when I had some chimney work done. Neither one saw any hail damage. Now all of a sudden I have "old" hail damage?
I'm going to have some additional contractors out but so far SF is not willing to pay out on the roof. The damage they agree to is less than my deductible. If they all ID hail damage without me telling them, then I'm going to have to lawyer up I guess.
I'm planning on selling in the next 1-3 years and I won't be able to sell the house with a damaged roof. Rough estimate out of pocket would be 10-12K for a full replacement. Just the loss of granules alone over the whole roof had to severely hurt it's longevity.
Anyone ever contest insurance company findings and win?
https://www.flickr.com/photos/jjr329/sets/72157644574687689/
Cliffs
Hail hits house and causes damage
Claim filed
Contractor says roof should be replaced as well as metals, screens, etc...
SF adjuster finds some damage but only the cheaper stuff and total is within my deductible.
Can I fight and win?
Last edited: