thehstrybean
Diamond Member
- Oct 25, 2004
- 5,727
- 1
- 0
Originally posted by: loup garou
+10 points for using "liberal media" :roll:
Don't worry, you have weeks of 9/11, 5 years later to look forward to after this!
Originally posted by: KDOG
Good frickin' grief. It seems like all the media can do lately is ram Katrina down everyones' throat. Even when you change the channel, there it is - "KATRINA-ONE YEAR LATER - DON'T YOU FREAKIN' FEEL BAD?" Geez, alright already. It happened. I don't need the liberal media trying to guilt trip me everywhere I turn, because its over. Time to move on. They're are other points I could make about this whole Katrina thing, but they belong in P&N...
My 2 cents...
Originally posted by: BooGiMaN
you have to be one lazy ass mofo sorry ass sonofa if after one year you are in the same or worse situation, im tired of hearing about people who squandered all the aid and free room and board and are complaingin and want more help
I guess you would feel beter if the news media got back to the important story why haven't they found Natalie Holloway. It's fine if people forgot the parents sent their naive 17 yr daughter to party and get drunk in the Carribean and don't take any personal responsibility.Originally posted by: Rickten
Originally posted by: BooGiMaN
you have to be one lazy ass mofo sorry ass sonofa if after one year you are in the same or worse situation, im tired of hearing about people who squandered all the aid and free room and board and are complaingin and want more help
oh but the governments hates them because of the color of their skin.
Just last night I was watching a Katrina specail on CBS or NBC and they kept showing pictures of women holding like 3 babies all less than 2 years old. Can't help but wonder why they have THREE babies when they can't even afford to provide transportation to get themselves out of town. Everyone keeps saying "I had no means or place to go to get out of town" but yet they can support three infant children.
Rental car $200 + gas $100 + hotel (two states away) $200 = $500 bucks to avoid being smack in the middle of a hurricane. This is why you keep emergency credit cards so you can charge 500 bucks to it to avoid danger for yourself and your 3 infant children.
Originally posted by: BooGiMaN
you have to be one lazy ass mofo sorry ass sonofa if after one year you are in the same or worse situation, im tired of hearing about people who squandered all the aid and free room and board and are complaingin and want more help
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
I heard some figures on the news this morning.
Following hurricane Andrew, the US Gov't spent $10 billion (adjusted for 2005) on recovery. Following the LA earthquake a few years later, $12 billion (adjusted for 2005).
To date, the US Gov't has spent over $120 billion on Katrina-related recovery!!! Ten times the next-largest amount!!!
I tell you, the whole mess, before, during, and after, is one giant argument against Big Government!
Originally posted by: lokiju
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
I heard some figures on the news this morning.
Following hurricane Andrew, the US Gov't spent $10 billion (adjusted for 2005) on recovery. Following the LA earthquake a few years later, $12 billion (adjusted for 2005).
To date, the US Gov't has spent over $120 billion on Katrina-related recovery!!! Ten times the next-largest amount!!!
I tell you, the whole mess, before, during, and after, is one giant argument against Big Government!
And Andrew was a much more powerful storm!
They ALWAYS associate hurricane Katrina with N.O. when it was the damn levees that gave and caused the flooding!
It should be addressed as the N.O. levees breaking story not the hurricane Katrina story :|
I lived in South FL at the time, Katrina went right over us and caused it's damage, then two weeks later we had Wilma that kicked our asses and caused destruction from Miami to West Palm, yet no news source said shyte about it! It's still screwed up down there from Wilma and Homestead is still 10 years later not fully recovered from the damage that Andrew caused.
Originally posted by: lokiju
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
I heard some figures on the news this morning.
Following hurricane Andrew, the US Gov't spent $10 billion (adjusted for 2005) on recovery. Following the LA earthquake a few years later, $12 billion (adjusted for 2005).
To date, the US Gov't has spent over $120 billion on Katrina-related recovery!!! Ten times the next-largest amount!!!
I tell you, the whole mess, before, during, and after, is one giant argument against Big Government!
And Andrew was a much more powerful storm!
They ALWAYS associate hurricane Katrina with N.O. when it was the damn levees that gave and caused the flooding!
It should be addressed as the N.O. levees breaking story not the hurricane Katrina story :|
I lived in South FL at the time, Katrina went right over us and caused it's damage, then two weeks later we had Wilma that kicked our asses and caused destruction from Miami to West Palm, yet no news source said shyte about it! It's still screwed up down there from Wilma and Homestead is still 10 years later not fully recovered from the damage that Andrew caused.
Originally posted by: loup garou
+10 points for using "liberal media" :roll:
Don't worry, you have weeks of 9/11, 5 years later to look forward to after this!
Originally posted by: ed21x
i'm more tired about the whole John Beney Ramsey thing.... i mean, why is there so much attention on the death of a single little girl compared to anyone else? is the fact that she joins kiddy pageants make her that much more important?
Originally posted by: badmouse
Yeah, that's what I'm sick of hearing - Katrina a year later, but only in NO. I actually wouldn't mind hearing about all the other places a year later. The scope of Katrina was enormous.
Originally posted by: Syrch
Originally posted by: lokiju
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
I heard some figures on the news this morning.
Following hurricane Andrew, the US Gov't spent $10 billion (adjusted for 2005) on recovery. Following the LA earthquake a few years later, $12 billion (adjusted for 2005).
To date, the US Gov't has spent over $120 billion on Katrina-related recovery!!! Ten times the next-largest amount!!!
I tell you, the whole mess, before, during, and after, is one giant argument against Big Government!
And Andrew was a much more powerful storm!
They ALWAYS associate hurricane Katrina with N.O. when it was the damn levees that gave and caused the flooding!
It should be addressed as the N.O. levees breaking story not the hurricane Katrina story :|
I lived in South FL at the time, Katrina went right over us and caused it's damage, then two weeks later we had Wilma that kicked our asses and caused destruction from Miami to West Palm, yet no news source said shyte about it! It's still screwed up down there from Wilma and Homestead is still 10 years later not fully recovered from the damage that Andrew caused.
QFT
I was there for all the storms as well as i lived in S Fla for as 20 or so years. Don't get me wrong, i feel bad for the people without homes and what not but enough about the news coverage already. Hell my parents still don't have a functual roof from Wilma..are they on the news? Nope!
Originally posted by: Queasy
Originally posted by: badmouse
Yeah, that's what I'm sick of hearing - Katrina a year later, but only in NO. I actually wouldn't mind hearing about all the other places a year later. The scope of Katrina was enormous.
Yep. It wasn't Katrina that did NO in. It was bad levee designs and a corrupt local government that did nothing to fix the levees even though they had been leaking long before Katrina even hit. Katrina was just kind of the tipping point. The NO flooding was a man-made disaster.
The Mississippi Gulf Coast took the brunt of Katrina.
Originally posted by: MotionMan
I am going to burn in hell for this:
Could it be because they are not black? (Really! The popular media seems to prefer minority disaster viticms.)
MotionMan
Originally posted by: Chaotic42
Originally posted by: MotionMan
I am going to burn in hell for this:
Could it be because they are not black? (Really! The popular media seems to prefer minority disaster viticms.)
MotionMan
It's a possibility.
I've had the news on in the background for the last couple of hours, and all they want to talk about is Ernesto. It's a freaking weak tropical storms. One reporter was talking about wind gusts of "12, 13, 14 miles per hour. Some places had 35 miles per hour".
Please. That's a summer shower down there.
Originally posted by: Queasy
It's all about the ratings. Get some pretty young reporter standing in the rain holding on to a pole as the wind blows up her skirt...
Originally posted by: Chaotic42
Originally posted by: Queasy
It's all about the ratings. Get some pretty young reporter standing in the rain holding on to a pole as the wind blows up her skirt...
Well, I'm all for that. This was a fat Hispanic guy though, so I don't want to see that happen to him...![]()
