Any word if the HL2 benchmark is being released for public use on the 30th? Has anyone tried the new shadermark 2.0?

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
N

NYHoustonman

Platinum Member
Dec 8, 2002
2,642
0
0
I'll have to try that, and as a side note, the benchmark had better be released tomorrow...That would at least give me something :\...
 
rbV5

rbV5

Lifer
Dec 10, 2000
12,632
0
0
video mode / device info
(1024x768) X8R8G8B8 (D24X8) vram used 137363456
HAL (pure hw vp): ALL-IN-WONDER 9700 SERIES (Anti-Detect-Mode: on, gamma correction: DAC)

options

pixel shader version: 2_0
partial precision: off
number of render targets: 1

Results: (Just the worst one)

shader 17 ( Fur Shader With Anisotropic Lighting): 12 fps
 
1

1ManArmY

Golden Member
Mar 7, 2003
1,333
0
0
Analyze this gibberish.

pixel shader version: 2_0
partial precision: off
number of render targets: 1

results:
shader 1 ( Pixel Shader Precision Test): pixel shader 1.1 full precision: s16e7
( Pixel Shader Precision Test): pixel shader 1.4 full precision: s16e7
( Pixel Shader Precision Test): pixel shader 2.0 full precision: s16e7
( Pixel Shader Precision Test): pixel shader 2.0 partial precision: s16e7

shader 2 ( Per Pixel Diffuse Lighting): 232 fps 4.3124 mspf 1160 rendered frames
shader 3 ( Per Pixel Directional Light Shader (Phong)): 160 fps 6.2543 mspf 800 rendered frames
shader 4 ( Per Pixel Point Light Shader (Phong)): 163 fps 6.1304 mspf 816 rendered frames
shader 5 ( Per Pixel Spot Light Shader (Phong)): 130 fps 7.6805 mspf 651 rendered frames
shader 6 ( Per Pixel Anisotropic Lighting): 170 fps 5.8743 mspf 852 rendered frames
shader 7 ( Per Pixel Fresnel Reflections): 148 fps 6.7771 mspf 738 rendered frames
shader 8 ( Per Pixel BRDF-Phong/Anisotropic Lighting): 128 fps 7.8285 mspf 639 rendered frames
shader 9 ( Per Pixel Car Surface Shader): 116 fps 8.6151 mspf 581 rendered frames
shader 10 ( Per Pixel Environment Mapping): 238 fps 4.2050 mspf 1190 rendered frames
shader 11 ( Per Pixel Environment Bump Mapping): 207 fps 4.8328 mspf 1035 rendered frames
shader 12 ( Per Pixel Bump Mapping): 140 fps 7.1675 mspf 698 rendered frames
shader 13 ( Per Pixel Shadowed Bump Mapping): 130 fps 7.7006 mspf 650 rendered frames
shader 14 ( Per Pixel Veined Marble Shader): 113 fps 8.8469 mspf 566 rendered frames
shader 15 ( Per Pixel Wood Shader): 137 fps 7.3164 mspf 684 rendered frames
shader 16 ( Per Pixel Tile Shader): 76 fps 13.1913 mspf 380 rendered frames
shader 17 ( Fur Shader With Anisotropic Lighting): 13 fps 74.2259 mspf 68 rendered frames
shader 18 ( Per Pixel Refraction and Reflection Shader with Phong Lighting): 105 fps 9.5159 mspf 526 rendered frames
shader 19 ( Dual Depth Shadow Mapping With 3x3 Bilinear Percentage Closer Filter): 27 fps 36.7827 mspf 136 rendered frames
shader 20 ( High Dynamic Range Shader (cross blur)): 57 fps 17.5953 mspf 285 rendered frames
shader 21 ( High Dynamic Range Shader (gaussian blur)): 62 fps 16.0992 mspf 311 rendered frames
shader 22 ( Per Pixel Edge Detection And Hatching Shader): 37 fps 27.2323 mspf 184 rendered frames
shader 23 ( Per Pixel Water Colour Shader): 50 fps 19.9168 mspf 252 rendered frames
 
J

jiffylube1024

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
7,430
0
71
Originally posted by: 1ManArmY
Analyze this gibberish.

pixel shader version: 2_0
partial precision: off
number of render targets: 1

results:
shader 1 ( Pixel Shader Precision Test): pixel shader 1.1 full precision: s16e7
( Pixel Shader Precision Test): pixel shader 1.4 full precision: s16e7
( Pixel Shader Precision Test): pixel shader 2.0 full precision: s16e7
( Pixel Shader Precision Test): pixel shader 2.0 partial precision: s16e7

shader 2 ( Per Pixel Diffuse Lighting): 232 fps 4.3124 mspf 1160 rendered frames
shader 3 ( Per Pixel Directional Light Shader (Phong)): 160 fps 6.2543 mspf 800 rendered frames
shader 4 ( Per Pixel Point Light Shader (Phong)): 163 fps 6.1304 mspf 816 rendered frames
shader 5 ( Per Pixel Spot Light Shader (Phong)): 130 fps 7.6805 mspf 651 rendered frames
shader 6 ( Per Pixel Anisotropic Lighting): 170 fps 5.8743 mspf 852 rendered frames
shader 7 ( Per Pixel Fresnel Reflections): 148 fps 6.7771 mspf 738 rendered frames
shader 8 ( Per Pixel BRDF-Phong/Anisotropic Lighting): 128 fps 7.8285 mspf 639 rendered frames
shader 9 ( Per Pixel Car Surface Shader): 116 fps 8.6151 mspf 581 rendered frames
shader 10 ( Per Pixel Environment Mapping): 238 fps 4.2050 mspf 1190 rendered frames
shader 11 ( Per Pixel Environment Bump Mapping): 207 fps 4.8328 mspf 1035 rendered frames
shader 12 ( Per Pixel Bump Mapping): 140 fps 7.1675 mspf 698 rendered frames
shader 13 ( Per Pixel Shadowed Bump Mapping): 130 fps 7.7006 mspf 650 rendered frames
shader 14 ( Per Pixel Veined Marble Shader): 113 fps 8.8469 mspf 566 rendered frames
shader 15 ( Per Pixel Wood Shader): 137 fps 7.3164 mspf 684 rendered frames
shader 16 ( Per Pixel Tile Shader): 76 fps 13.1913 mspf 380 rendered frames
shader 17 ( Fur Shader With Anisotropic Lighting): 13 fps 74.2259 mspf 68 rendered frames
shader 18 ( Per Pixel Refraction and Reflection Shader with Phong Lighting): 105 fps 9.5159 mspf 526 rendered frames
shader 19 ( Dual Depth Shadow Mapping With 3x3 Bilinear Percentage Closer Filter): 27 fps 36.7827 mspf 136 rendered frames
shader 20 ( High Dynamic Range Shader (cross blur)): 57 fps 17.5953 mspf 285 rendered frames
shader 21 ( High Dynamic Range Shader (gaussian blur)): 62 fps 16.0992 mspf 311 rendered frames
shader 22 ( Per Pixel Edge Detection And Hatching Shader): 37 fps 27.2323 mspf 184 rendered frames
shader 23 ( Per Pixel Water Colour Shader): 50 fps 19.9168 mspf 252 rendered frames
Click to expand...

Total FPS (Tests 2-23): 2639
Average fps (Tests 2-23): 119.95

There's your freaking analysis ;).
 
rbV5

rbV5

Lifer
Dec 10, 2000
12,632
0
0
Analyze this gibberish
Click to expand...

Looks like my rig is 78% to 89% the performance of yours in shadermark comparing them test for test, which seems reasonable..I'm clocked at 1870MHz (170x11) currently. It also looks like the Fur Shader With Anisotropic Lighting test crawls.
 
Noid

Noid

Platinum Member
Sep 20, 2000
2,390
193
106
the guru3d mirror has a bad file ...

trying another now
 
J

jiffylube1024

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
7,430
0
71
Mine:

ShaderMark v2.0 - DirectX 9 HLSL Pixel Shader Benchmark - ToMMTi-Systems (http://www.tommti-systems.com)

video mode / device info
(1024x768) X8R8G8B8 (D24X8) vram used 137363456
HAL (pure hw vp): RADEON 9800 PRO (Anti-Detect-Mode: off, gamma correction: DAC)



options

pixel shader version: 2_0
partial precision: off
number of render targets: 1

results:
shader 1 ( Pixel Shader Precision Test): pixel shader 1.1 full precision: s16e7
( Pixel Shader Precision Test): pixel shader 1.4 full precision: s16e7
( Pixel Shader Precision Test): pixel shader 2.0 full precision: s16e7
( Pixel Shader Precision Test): pixel shader 2.0 partial precision: s16e7

shader 2 ( Per Pixel Diffuse Lighting): 225 fps 4.4437 mspf 1126 rendered frames
shader 3 ( Per Pixel Directional Light Shader (Phong)): 163 fps 6.1425 mspf 814 rendered frames
shader 4 ( Per Pixel Point Light Shader (Phong)): 163 fps 6.1519 mspf 813 rendered frames
shader 5 ( Per Pixel Spot Light Shader (Phong)): 134 fps 7.4797 mspf 669 rendered frames
shader 6 ( Per Pixel Anisotropic Lighting): 173 fps 5.7890 mspf 864 rendered frames
shader 7 ( Per Pixel Fresnel Reflections): 151 fps 6.6375 mspf 754 rendered frames
shader 8 ( Per Pixel BRDF-Phong/Anisotropic Lighting): 118 fps 8.5096 mspf 588 rendered frames
shader 9 ( Per Pixel Car Surface Shader): 114 fps 8.7384 mspf 573 rendered frames
shader 10 ( Per Pixel Environment Mapping): 251 fps 3.9858 mspf 1255 rendered frames
shader 11 ( Per Pixel Environment Bump Mapping): 217 fps 4.6000 mspf 1087 rendered frames
shader 12 ( Per Pixel Bump Mapping): 145 fps 6.8793 mspf 727 rendered frames
shader 13 ( Per Pixel Shadowed Bump Mapping): 85 fps 11.7883 mspf 425 rendered frames
shader 14 ( Per Pixel Veined Marble Shader): 85 fps 11.7606 mspf 426 rendered frames
shader 15 ( Per Pixel Wood Shader): 123 fps 8.1116 mspf 617 rendered frames
shader 16 ( Per Pixel Tile Shader): 77 fps 12.9162 mspf 388 rendered frames
shader 17 ( Fur Shader With Anisotropic Lighting): 13 fps 74.3983 mspf 68 rendered frames
shader 18 ( Per Pixel Refraction and Reflection Shader with Phong Lighting): 109 fps 9.1443 mspf 547 rendered frames
shader 19 ( Dual Depth Shadow Mapping With 3x3 Bilinear Percentage Closer Filter): 28 fps 35.3230 mspf 142 rendered frames
shader 20 ( High Dynamic Range Shader (cross blur)): 46 fps 21.5791 mspf 232 rendered frames
shader 21 ( High Dynamic Range Shader (gaussian blur)): 50 fps 19.9524 mspf 251 rendered frames
shader 22 ( Per Pixel Edge Detection And Hatching Shader): 37 fps 27.2628 mspf 184 rendered frames
shader 23 ( Per Pixel Water Colour Shader): 52 fps 19.1749 mspf 261 rendered frames

Bleh, 116 avg FPS, and what's worse - I don't know why my Shader 13 and 14 are so bad compared to yours 1manarmy . Your 9800 must be clocked much higher than mine (I'm only at 400/290).
 
J

jiffylube1024

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
7,430
0
71
Originally posted by: rbV5
Analyze this gibberish
Click to expand...

Looks like my rig is 78% to 89% the performance of yours in shadermark comparing them test for test, which seems reasonable..I'm clocked at 1870MHz (170x11) currently. It also looks like the Fur Shader With Anisotropic Lighting test crawls.
Click to expand...

^ I'm guessing this is why that test runs so slow (bolded words).

 
Noid

Noid

Platinum Member
Sep 20, 2000
2,390
193
106
ShaderMark v2.0 - DirectX 9 HLSL Pixel Shader Benchmark - ToMMTi-Systems (http://www.tommti-systems.com)

video mode / device info
(1024x768) X8R8G8B8 (D24X8) vram used 137363456
HAL (pure hw vp): RADEON 9700 PRO (Anti-Detect-Mode: off, gamma correction: DAC)



options

pixel shader version: 2_0
partial precision: off
number of render targets: 1

results:
shader 1 ( Pixel Shader Precision Test): pixel shader 1.1 full precision: s16e7
( Pixel Shader Precision Test): pixel shader 1.4 full precision: s16e7
( Pixel Shader Precision Test): pixel shader 2.0 full precision: s16e7
( Pixel Shader Precision Test): pixel shader 2.0 partial precision: s16e7

shader 2 ( Per Pixel Diffuse Lighting): 227 fps 4.4139 mspf 1133 rendered frames
shader 3 ( Per Pixel Directional Light Shader (Phong)): 156 fps 6.4002 mspf 782 rendered frames
shader 4 ( Per Pixel Point Light Shader (Phong)): 159 fps 6.2772 mspf 797 rendered frames
shader 5 ( Per Pixel Spot Light Shader (Phong)): 127 fps 7.8570 mspf 637 rendered frames
shader 6 ( Per Pixel Anisotropic Lighting): 166 fps 6.0206 mspf 831 rendered frames
shader 7 ( Per Pixel Fresnel Reflections): 144 fps 6.9366 mspf 721 rendered frames
shader 8 ( Per Pixel BRDF-Phong/Anisotropic Lighting): 126 fps 7.9642 mspf 628 rendered frames
shader 9 ( Per Pixel Car Surface Shader): 113 fps 8.8208 mspf 567 rendered frames
shader 10 ( Per Pixel Environment Mapping): 232 fps 4.3071 mspf 1161 rendered frames
shader 11 ( Per Pixel Environment Bump Mapping): 202 fps 4.9495 mspf 1011 rendered frames
shader 12 ( Per Pixel Bump Mapping): 136 fps 7.3367 mspf 682 rendered frames
shader 13 ( Per Pixel Shadowed Bump Mapping): 127 fps 7.8783 mspf 635 rendered frames
shader 14 ( Per Pixel Veined Marble Shader): 110 fps 9.0531 mspf 553 rendered frames
shader 15 ( Per Pixel Wood Shader): 133 fps 7.4925 mspf 668 rendered frames
shader 16 ( Per Pixel Tile Shader): 74 fps 13.4949 mspf 371 rendered frames
shader 17 ( Fur Shader With Anisotropic Lighting): 13 fps 75.8348 mspf 66 rendered frames
shader 18 ( Per Pixel Refraction and Reflection Shader with Phong Lighting): 103 fps 9.7552 mspf 513 rendered frames
shader 19 ( Dual Depth Shadow Mapping With 3x3 Bilinear Percentage Closer Filter): 27 fps 37.5428 mspf 134 rendered frames
shader 20 ( High Dynamic Range Shader (cross blur)): 56 fps 17.9660 mspf 279 rendered frames
shader 21 ( High Dynamic Range Shader (gaussian blur)): 61 fps 16.4626 mspf 304 rendered frames
shader 22 ( Per Pixel Edge Detection And Hatching Shader): 36 fps 27.8408 mspf 180 rendered frames
shader 23 ( Per Pixel Water Colour Shader): 51 fps 19.6412 mspf 255 rendered frames

wtf ... my 9700 performs better than 9800 on some tests?

Ummmm ... CP set on Performance settings thou ,,, but Ap Preference ON
 
J

jiffylube1024

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
7,430
0
71
Originally posted by: Noid
wtf ... my 9700 performs better than 9800 on some tests?

Ummmm ... CP set on Performance settings thou ,,, but Ap Preference ON
Click to expand...

Well you get 18,000 3dmarks on 2k1 while I (and several other 9800 owners) only get 16,000 so obviously it's not just this benchmark. Your heavily overclocked system, dual-channel memory, and more importantly video card give you such good performance. 360/350 is damn impressive for a 9700Pro! I'm only running my 9800 non-pro at 400/290, for example.
 
Noid

Noid

Platinum Member
Sep 20, 2000
2,390
193
106
hmmm ,,, I'm at 2263 Mhz ... only 60 more than your 2200.

but at 215 Fsb using Cas 2.0 11 3 2

but, you have more cache, so I'm confused also

I recently got more from my 9700 core ... now 369

The only thing I can think of that might make the differences might be a clean install of OS..?
then then load most recent drivers
 
A

AndrewKu

Member
Jun 16, 2003
150
0
0
Hehehe... Sorry should have been more clear. :p The public benchmark seems to be a bit delayed too.

Raised to the 1000th? Probably... :p
 
A

AndrewKu

Member
Jun 16, 2003
150
0
0
I will talk with ATI and hopefully Valve later today. We will report back later. Just relax...

Trust me you will get the "fuzzy wuzzy" feeling sooner or later. (I know you want sooner.) :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom