• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

any great new processor/mobo tech coming in January?

bluemax

Diamond Member
I'll be building my new system in January to run my power-and-RAM hungry music applications.

What cool new technologies are coming out that I should be looking for? 😉
 
I heard about a new* HDD technology that will allow up to 14 drives per cable and cable lengths up to 12 meters :Q The drives run up to 15000rpms and have very low seek times, tagged command queueing, 5-year warranties, optional hot-swap capability... but the cost per GB is going to be quite high 🙁 Anyway, they can run on standard mobos using an adapter card.
















* :evil:
 
Originally posted by: Mojoed
Well if anything, the Nforce 4 *should* be available. That's worth waiting for in my opinion.
"Should" being the key word. First look reviews on a couple of the boards under the mobo tab, but no full reviews yet. Waiting for a second look. 😉
 
Originally posted by: mechBgon.
* :evil:
Ummm.... did I miss something? Is this a new form of SCSI? Are you talking about good ol' SCSI and just being silly because most people have forgotten about it?

I missed the joke....

HDD technology is a good thing! Fast! Cool! QUIET!!

 
Originally posted by: bluemax
Originally posted by: mechBgon.
* :evil:
Ummm.... did I miss something? Is this a new form of SCSI? Are you talking about good ol' SCSI and just being silly because most people have forgotten about it?

I missed the joke....

HDD technology is a good thing! Fast! Cool! QUIET!!

:shocked:

lol yea it was a joke. 🙂
 
I'm 97% nice, 3% troll, and the troll part is SCSI troll 😀 Don't mind me...


Just for perspective, though, I have a 1GHz Duron at home with an older 15000rpm SCSI drive, and my mom's system looks a lot better on paper (1.8GHz Duron, modern ATA drives) but is much less responsive in seat-of-the-pants usage. I was over there last night trying to run a virus scan, burn a home-movie DVD and switch users... talk about frustration, the ATA drives were all "you mean, all at the same time?! 😕"

mechBgon: why is this so hard?! :| SWITCH USERS ALREADY, YOU PIECE OF JUNK! :roll:

I think that system is going to inherit a Cheetah X15-36LP when I get my next 15k drive.
 
Bluemax:

What kind of souncard and audio components do you have on your computer?

The reason i am asking is that i am planning to build a computer to run audio applications as well and i am wondering if i just need to get a good soundcard or do i need a separate amp to get pretty good sounds.

Thanks!
 
Originally posted by: DanDrop
Bluemax:

What kind of souncard and audio components do you have on your computer?

The reason i am asking is that i am planning to build a computer to run audio applications as well and i am wondering if i just need to get a good soundcard or do i need a separate amp to get pretty good sounds.

Thanks!

I'll most liekly be running a cheap-but-awesome card from M-Audio's Audiophile series. MIDI port, clean audio, proper ASIO2 low-latency drivers and super support from the music industy - including the makers of pro-audio software. The older Audiophile 2496 is cheap now that a 192khz version is out.

MIDI will connect any old, old external sound modules and a new MIDI controller keyboard. Getting MIDI and audio on the same PROFESSIONAL card (read: NOT SandBlaster!) means reliable low-latency MIDI control too.
 
4200+ should be out (2.6 Ghz) same as fx-55 minus 512 K.... Prescotts should have 2 MB on cache in feb, erm thats it. On the CPU front anyway.
 
Originally posted by: w00t
xpress 200

I must admit, the ATI Xpress200 s939 + 90nm tech looks interesting!

90nm runs cooler? Intels done a couple die shrinks in the past where temps INCREASED instead...
 
yeah, but I think 2.4 Ghz is the best we'll see this year( if they are luckey). Feb-march, you will see 2.6 Ghz/2.8 Ghz ( May) time for opteron.
 
Originally posted by: bluemax
90nm runs cooler? Intels done a couple die shrinks in the past where temps INCREASED instead...

AMD better executed their move to 90nm, so their temps ended up slightly cooler in this case.
 
on the CPU side, probably just better clockspeeds and overclocking due to SSDOI technology. Possibly SSE3, but not for sure. Dual core and DDR2 won't be till late next year/early 2006, definitely not on the horizon yet.

As for mobos, NF4 is pretty much the king of the hill for a while. the Intel nforce chipset will be pretty much the same, but with DDR2 667 support. NF4 pretty much laid everything new out on the table, there won't be a whole lot of improvements till soundstorm 2 (if it does indeed come back) and their NF4 IGP chipset (6200 series graphics with "turbo cache" shared/dedicated memory combo), and those will not be out for a while. And as for availability, yeah, they are scarce, but they are available. I happen to have one sitting on my desk as we speak, waiting for the components to put into it (it's an Asus A8N-SLI, btw, i found it for $201 on novapcs.com). Gigabyte, MSI, and DFI boards are all popping up for preorder.
 
Question: Are there people who think ATA interface is better entirely than the SCSI interface? I have worked with SCSI and I can see how it would be difficult for a newbie but when you get the hang of it and you have ACTUAL/properly working drivers its not soo bad.

Here are the advantages I see with the two interfaces:
SCSI:
Fast, Fastest drives 15kRPM, supports many many devices, good support from legacy operating systems (IDE too of course), PCI-X Controllers to better take advantage of that bandwidth etc, so fast that systems with little ram are not slowed down since SCSI drives are so fast paging isn't an issue! (Love that one!), Raid Support that has been around for a while

ATA: Simple, Relatively fast drives, very very good driver support (more so than scsi) so many more drives out there that are IDE, Cheaper, larger capacity, practically every desktop has got a drive based on it so drives are interchangeable.

SATA The same as ATA except, higher bandwidth then before but still not as fast as scsi, faster drives, Raid support (ATA too but not as common/support).

Anymore you can see? Just post!
 
Originally posted by: mechBgon
I'm 97% nice, 3% troll, and the troll part is SCSI troll 😀 Don't mind me...
LOL. Good one. 🙂

Originally posted by: mechBgon
Just for perspective, though, I have a 1GHz Duron at home with an older 15000rpm SCSI drive, and my mom's system looks a lot better on paper (1.8GHz Duron, modern ATA drives) but is much less responsive in seat-of-the-pants usage. I was over there last night trying to run a virus scan, burn a home-movie DVD and switch users... talk about frustration, the ATA drives were all "you mean, all at the same time?! 😕"
Yeah, I used to have an i440BX/PII rig, with a crud-load of SCSI peripherals in a full-tower case. I could rip, burn, watch a DVD, and play a PSX emulator, all at the same time. (Scary, eh?) I can't even burn CDs disc-to-disc on my current Athlon/KT400/8235 system. 🙁

If only the prices for current-gen SCSI peripherals hadn't either become non-existant or the prices gone through the roof, I'd probably still be running those devices.
Originally posted by: mechBgon
mechBgon: why is this so hard?! :| SWITCH USERS ALREADY, YOU PIECE OF JUNK! :roll:
I think that system is going to inherit a Cheetah X15-36LP when I get my next 15k drive.
Yeah, my former employer a few years ago that was an independent reseller in the area, and knew his stuff - his personal home rig was all-SCSI too, on a good old 2940(UW).

I was both fascinated and disturbed that I can't do a file-copy operation involving my Maxtor 250GB DM+9 on my current system, while burning a file reading off of same drive, to my NEC 4x DVD burner, without triggering burn-proof left and right. IDE devices just do not like to share. 🙁 (My IBM 30GB 75GXP was pretty fast though, as IDE HDs go, in terms of seeks and simultanious accesses - I think their firmware-engineering guys are the same ones that did the firmware for IBM's SCSI drives. IBM PATA drives were some of the first to support ATA TCQ too.) In my i440BX system, I had no problem ripping from one CD while burning another, both to the 75GXP, although only at like 8x CD speeds.

Here's what I don't get - the "ghost of SCSI" lives on, in the form of SCSI command protocols, over both SATA-2 and/or SASI (not totally clear on that yet myself), and Firewire/IEEE1394a. So why don't we see more peripherals using Firewire (like CD/DVD burners!), instead of SATA or USB2.0? USB has to be one of the most convoluted, "clunky" peripheral-attachment interfaces around, IMHO. Fine for mice/keyboard/joysticks, but anything more than that is questionable. I remember back when printers and scanners were on SCSI too - so why aren't there more Firewire-capable printers/scanners out there? I would think that they would have a good selling-point for video/photo enthusiasts too - hook your Firewire-capable DV camcorder to your printer directly, and print photos directly from video still-frames, stuff like that.

I sometimes think that the industry has become "too smart", they "churn" technology for consumers, triggering another technology-replacement buying cycle, but with no real benefit. We're running, but we're not actually getting anywhere. Kind of like those scary dreams when you were a kid, walking down the hallway, but try as hard as you might, you can't actually get anywhere other than where you are stuck. The PC technology industry seems to be the same way.
 
Originally posted by: VirtualLarry
Originally posted by: mechBgon
So what you're saying is, I'm not actually crazy? 😕
😀

No, that I am crazy, and I happen to agree with your points. Hehe. Welcome.. to the asylum of SCSI. 😛

Takes me back to the 486 days.... I went overboard and bought a new-off-the-production-lines Soundblaster 16 SCSI2 w/ ASP and a 2x SCSI CD-ROM. Cost way more than their IDE brethren, but I must admit it was one of the best optical drives I've ever run!

I miss those days where there was NO pause for CD-ROM spinups in the middle of a game. But that disappeared with the 4x IDE CD-ROMs... now we get to wait while things pause to spin up... and sound like jet engines. I'll take a lower top speed with faster response time ANY day!

Though I am going to need a fast CPU for my music app.

Thanks for the reminder.... must seriously consider a SCSI HDD with my new system... even if only 20-40GB for the main Windows drive and use a cheap IDE for storage on the side.

You don't see mobos with built-in SCSI anymore. 😉
 
Back
Top