Originally posted by: mechBgon
I'm 97% nice, 3% troll, and the troll part is SCSI troll 😀 Don't mind me...
LOL. Good one.
🙂
Originally posted by: mechBgon
Just for perspective, though, I have a 1GHz Duron at home with an older 15000rpm SCSI drive, and my mom's system looks a lot better on paper (1.8GHz Duron, modern ATA drives) but is much less responsive in seat-of-the-pants usage. I was over there last night trying to run a virus scan, burn a home-movie DVD and switch users... talk about frustration, the ATA drives were all "you mean, all at the same time?! 😕"
Yeah, I used to have an i440BX/PII rig, with a crud-load of SCSI peripherals in a full-tower case. I could rip, burn, watch a DVD, and play a PSX emulator, all at the same time. (Scary, eh?) I can't even burn CDs disc-to-disc on my current Athlon/KT400/8235 system.
🙁
If only the prices for current-gen SCSI peripherals hadn't either become non-existant or the prices gone through the roof, I'd probably still be running those devices.
Originally posted by: mechBgon
mechBgon: why is this so hard?! :| SWITCH USERS ALREADY, YOU PIECE OF JUNK! :roll:
I think that system is going to inherit a Cheetah X15-36LP when I get my next 15k drive.
Yeah, my former employer a few years ago that was an independent reseller in the area, and knew his stuff - his personal home rig was all-SCSI too, on a good old 2940(UW).
I was both fascinated and disturbed that I can't do a file-copy operation involving my Maxtor 250GB DM+9 on my current system, while burning a file reading off of same drive, to my NEC 4x DVD burner, without triggering burn-proof left and right. IDE devices just do not like to share.
🙁 (My IBM 30GB 75GXP was pretty fast though, as IDE HDs go, in terms of seeks and simultanious accesses - I think their firmware-engineering guys are the same ones that did the firmware for IBM's SCSI drives. IBM PATA drives were some of the first to support ATA TCQ too.) In my i440BX system, I had no problem ripping from one CD while burning another, both to the 75GXP, although only at like 8x CD speeds.
Here's what I don't get - the "ghost of SCSI" lives on, in the form of SCSI command protocols, over both SATA-2 and/or SASI (not totally clear on that yet myself), and Firewire/IEEE1394a. So why don't we see more peripherals using Firewire (like CD/DVD burners!), instead of SATA or USB2.0? USB has to be one of the most convoluted, "clunky" peripheral-attachment interfaces around, IMHO. Fine for mice/keyboard/joysticks, but anything more than that is questionable. I remember back when printers and scanners were on SCSI too - so why aren't there more Firewire-capable printers/scanners out there? I would think that they would have a good selling-point for video/photo enthusiasts too - hook your Firewire-capable DV camcorder to your printer directly, and print photos directly from video still-frames, stuff like that.
I sometimes think that the industry has become "too smart", they "churn" technology for consumers, triggering another technology-replacement buying cycle,
but with no real benefit. We're running, but we're not actually getting anywhere. Kind of like those scary dreams when you were a kid, walking down the hallway, but try as hard as you might, you can't actually get anywhere other than where you are stuck. The PC technology industry seems to be the same way.