Originally posted by: rchiu
Originally posted by: fk49
Originally posted by: rchiu
My Brisbane x2 4000+ oc'ed to ~2.9ghz and I think Brisbane core on average tops out at around 3.ghz. If you get 3.2/3.3, that's very lucky. I would say 3.0ghz is an average overclock. Black 5000+ make it easy to oc with unlocked multiplier, but the cpu itself is not necessary hand picked to guarantee higher oc.
With that in mind, do you think the price premium of the x2 5000 would be worth it over the x2 4000 if my RAM does not seem to enjoy overclocking? If its still possible to reach ~3ghz by just raising the FSB on the x2 4000, I don't see the point of spending $60 more.
Possible to reach ~3ghz? Yes, but I'd say it's probably 40/60. And with x2 4000, your mobo and memory will need to play nice with your oc as well. If you don't have good memory and good mobo, and you HAVE TO get to around 3.0, I'd say the $60 is worth it. But if you can live with 2.7~3.0 and everything in between, the x2 4000 is pretty good for the money. In my case, I have good RAM and decent oc mobo, and I decided to go cheap with CPU, so I went with the 4000.
Hmm. Well my motherboard has a pretty good reputation as an overclocking -- I believe its just the memory holding me back. But yeah, anything around 2.7~3.0 would be a good o/c on this system. and I suppose the $60 I save would be able to go towards buying good RAM or a better gfx card anyway.
