Any 16 yr olds own a 02 Mustang GT ?

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Mill

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
28,558
3
81
Originally posted by: shady06
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: shady06
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: shady06
mill,

02 mustang v8 1/4 mile 14.7
02 maxima se 1/4 14.9
i'm almost sure the 2003 se was 14.7 but i cant find the link

ok, so not faster, but equal. also, keep in mind that it is very difficult to run the mustang that fast cuz its a stick so u have to get the timings down like a pro as where with the maxima you just push the pedal

Uh....do I even have to respond to that? That's the most convoluted and inaccurate statement I've heard on the net. You've never been to a track before have you? You don't just press the pedal and go because you STILL get wheelspin regardless of transmission. EVERYONE has to get their 60ft times down, and it's certainly easier to get a good 60ft on a stock mustang with a manual vs an auto. Now take a lentech with a nice stall and transbrake and you have no comparison, or even a decently stock 4r70w with a stall and decent tires and you can hook up. A stock auto in either car will have wheelspin and a crappy 60ft. With the smaller amount of torque the Maxima has it will obviously be easier to bog. BTW, the Maxima does come in 6spd and the GT has an auto trans available as well.I ran a 14.03 in my Stock automatic. I've never seen a 99-03 GT go slower than 14.2-14.3 unless it was the driver or traction limited. The Mustang is very very very clearly the faster car. I'm not sure who the hell jbautos is, but you can check the actual timeslips I posted from Maxima forums and compare it to ones on the corral.




yes you are correct, i was exaggerating when i said push the pedal but surely you'll agree that its more difficult running a stick @ a certain speed than it is an automatic esp for a new driver.

anyway, considering gas millage and insurance, it seems to me the maxima is a better buy and please dont take this as me ragging on the mustang cuz i'm not

No, actually, I won't agree. Most people with a manual have mastered some form of being able to take off from a stop without spinning, b ut most people in an Auto never give it enough gas to lose traction unless they ARE trying to race someone. Here is how I would explain it to you. An auto takes much more skill to get a good 60ft and a good 1/4 mile pass than it does for a manual. Some might disagree with me, but we are talking STOCK auto trannys here. You are going to fight not bogging out or spinning and you CANNOT stall it above the stock convertor. With a manual you can find that "sweet" RPM spot, and if the track is consistently prepped good you will be able to launch from that RPM all night long. I can tell you from experience that it SUCKS launching at 1800 RPM. Compare that to a manual to where you can launch at whatever you want.



we are talking about a new driver here

You don't get it, so I'm not going to waste anymore of my night after this post to explain it to you. Regardless of the skill level of the driver, you cannot stall higher than about 1800 RPM on the 4r70w mustang gt unless you replace the torque convertor. Because of that limitation, it is much harder to feather the gas coming out of the hole and not spin or bog(if you don't give enough gas). With a manual you have the benefit of adjusting your holeshot right out the box and being able to stick with a consistent RPM. 1800 is way to low to get a good launch, so you end up stalling it up and then feathering the gas until you hook up. With a manual you are going to be able to find the RPM ranges that gives you traction and get out of the hole. I'm not saying you'll never spin or bog, because you will, but your chances are reduced compared to a stock 4r70w. I'm a huge fan of good racing auto trannys or a modded auto tranny, but stockwise they aren't going to provide the holeshot or track times that you think. The skill level is actually HARDER.
 

Mill

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
28,558
3
81
I feel like NFS4, but the 03 3.5SE received a 15.0 in Road and Track. They don't have times listed for the Mustang, but I know for a fact that I personally went 14.03 stock, and that most 99-03 GT's average anywhere from 13.8x to 14.3x.

That's the facts.
 
Apr 17, 2003
37,622
0
76
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: shady06
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: shady06
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: shady06
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: shady06
no, lets not turn it into that but i know 3 people with mustangs and all of them had put a serious amount of $ into them for repair

Repair what? What year car? What trim?

2001, 2001, 2000

2 of them had cracked headers, not sure what the third one was

Cracked headers? I've followed the Corral, Stangnet, and other forums for years, and there has NEVER been a report of cracked header on a Mustang unless it was modded. I call complete and total BS.

you can call bs if youd like, but thats what happened

Well, I know of over 200 Mustang drivers offhand that have never had a cracked header, and there are about 20k more on the corral. So the statistical probability of you knowing 2 people out of 3 with cracked headers, is about the same probability of me having an orgy with Britney Spears, President Reagan, the Pope, and Marilyn Monroe. To put that is perspective, that means it isn't probable that you're telling the truth. Do you even know how a header would get cracked? Do you know what a header is?

i'm not a car buff, i know what a header is, i dont know how you crack it. anyway, millage has something to do with it too i assume. you could go on and on and draw your analogies, but i dont really care. going with your logic i would be lying about my godfather dying from a brain tumor cuz only 1 in 100000 people die from it....

Wrong again. Mileage would have very little to do with a cracked header on a car that is that new or period really. The only way a header like that would crack is if there was a defect in the header to begin with. Well, if that was the case then we would be hearing of 100's of Mustangs with cracked headers, but alas we are only hearing about YOUR two friends, and that information cannot be validated at all. Even if there was a defect in the header, it would have been noticed and the headers would have been replaced on all those cars before they were sold. This isn't an internal part that takes wear and tear to notice. A header with a crack is going to leak exhaust and the engine sound is going to very obviously display an exhaust leak.

Whatever, it's obvious you know way more abouts cars than I do.

i made it clear i'm not a car buff and i never said i knew more than you.

obviously i have learned the maxima is not faster, but it is quite competitive. so if .5 seconds is worth worse gas millage and more $$$ for insurance than by all means buy the mustang, to me, it simply isnt worth it so a maxima is a better buy for ME
 

Mill

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
28,558
3
81

0-60 does mean something, because the Maxima doesn't have any forced induction to make up the difference, plus it has significantly less torque.
 
Apr 17, 2003
37,622
0
76
Originally posted by: Mill

0-60 does mean something, because the Maxima doesn't have any forced induction to make up the difference, plus it has significantly less torque.

arent there some cars that have slower 0-60 compared to another particular car, but still win the 1/4 mile?
 

Mill

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
28,558
3
81
Originally posted by: shady06
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: shady06
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: shady06
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: shady06
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: shady06
no, lets not turn it into that but i know 3 people with mustangs and all of them had put a serious amount of $ into them for repair

Repair what? What year car? What trim?

2001, 2001, 2000

2 of them had cracked headers, not sure what the third one was

Cracked headers? I've followed the Corral, Stangnet, and other forums for years, and there has NEVER been a report of cracked header on a Mustang unless it was modded. I call complete and total BS.

you can call bs if youd like, but thats what happened

Well, I know of over 200 Mustang drivers offhand that have never had a cracked header, and there are about 20k more on the corral. So the statistical probability of you knowing 2 people out of 3 with cracked headers, is about the same probability of me having an orgy with Britney Spears, President Reagan, the Pope, and Marilyn Monroe. To put that is perspective, that means it isn't probable that you're telling the truth. Do you even know how a header would get cracked? Do you know what a header is?

i'm not a car buff, i know what a header is, i dont know how you crack it. anyway, millage has something to do with it too i assume. you could go on and on and draw your analogies, but i dont really care. going with your logic i would be lying about my godfather dying from a brain tumor cuz only 1 in 100000 people die from it....

Wrong again. Mileage would have very little to do with a cracked header on a car that is that new or period really. The only way a header like that would crack is if there was a defect in the header to begin with. Well, if that was the case then we would be hearing of 100's of Mustangs with cracked headers, but alas we are only hearing about YOUR two friends, and that information cannot be validated at all. Even if there was a defect in the header, it would have been noticed and the headers would have been replaced on all those cars before they were sold. This isn't an internal part that takes wear and tear to notice. A header with a crack is going to leak exhaust and the engine sound is going to very obviously display an exhaust leak.

Whatever, it's obvious you know way more abouts cars than I do.

i made it clear i'm not a car buff and i never said i knew more than you.

obviously i have learned the maxima is not faster, but it is quite competitive. so if .5 seconds is worth worse gas millage and more $$$ for insurance than by all means buy the mustang, to me, it simply isnt worth it so a maxima is a better buy for ME

It's more than 0.5 seconds gap in 1/4 time, but it's not just that the Mustang is faster. It's a two door, looks better, and has a much much much much much much much much much larger aftermarket available.
 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
Originally posted by: shady06
Originally posted by: mugsywwiii
Originally posted by: shady06

You're an idiot.

Originally posted by: RaiseUp

You're an idiot.

mugsywwiii, you're an idiot. see? that doesnt take too much skill

I thought Millennium was doing such a great job of proving it that I could just post my conclusions. However, if you insist... not all Maximas are automatics and not all Mustangs are manuals. I don't know why you brought that assumption into your argument.
 

Mill

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
28,558
3
81
Originally posted by: shady06
Originally posted by: Mill

0-60 does mean something, because the Maxima doesn't have any forced induction to make up the difference, plus it has significantly less torque.

arent there some cars that have slower 0-60 compared to another particular car, but still win the 1/4 mile?

*Que* Forced Induction or gearing. I guess you could short gear a car to where it couldn't get a decent trap speed, or you could make it have such tall gearing that it would take forever to get down the track...

Of course traction is a huge issue as well, and I've never seen anyone puts slicks or drag radials on a Maxima either.
 
Apr 17, 2003
37,622
0
76
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: shady06
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: shady06
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: shady06
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: shady06
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: shady06
no, lets not turn it into that but i know 3 people with mustangs and all of them had put a serious amount of $ into them for repair

Repair what? What year car? What trim?

2001, 2001, 2000

2 of them had cracked headers, not sure what the third one was

Cracked headers? I've followed the Corral, Stangnet, and other forums for years, and there has NEVER been a report of cracked header on a Mustang unless it was modded. I call complete and total BS.

you can call bs if youd like, but thats what happened

Well, I know of over 200 Mustang drivers offhand that have never had a cracked header, and there are about 20k more on the corral. So the statistical probability of you knowing 2 people out of 3 with cracked headers, is about the same probability of me having an orgy with Britney Spears, President Reagan, the Pope, and Marilyn Monroe. To put that is perspective, that means it isn't probable that you're telling the truth. Do you even know how a header would get cracked? Do you know what a header is?

i'm not a car buff, i know what a header is, i dont know how you crack it. anyway, millage has something to do with it too i assume. you could go on and on and draw your analogies, but i dont really care. going with your logic i would be lying about my godfather dying from a brain tumor cuz only 1 in 100000 people die from it....

Wrong again. Mileage would have very little to do with a cracked header on a car that is that new or period really. The only way a header like that would crack is if there was a defect in the header to begin with. Well, if that was the case then we would be hearing of 100's of Mustangs with cracked headers, but alas we are only hearing about YOUR two friends, and that information cannot be validated at all. Even if there was a defect in the header, it would have been noticed and the headers would have been replaced on all those cars before they were sold. This isn't an internal part that takes wear and tear to notice. A header with a crack is going to leak exhaust and the engine sound is going to very obviously display an exhaust leak.

Whatever, it's obvious you know way more abouts cars than I do.

i made it clear i'm not a car buff and i never said i knew more than you.

obviously i have learned the maxima is not faster, but it is quite competitive. so if .5 seconds is worth worse gas millage and more $$$ for insurance than by all means buy the mustang, to me, it simply isnt worth it so a maxima is a better buy for ME

It's more than 0.5 seconds gap in 1/4 time, but it's not just that the Mustang is faster. It's a two door, looks better, and has a much much much much much much much much much larger aftermarket available.


well, i'm basing my .5 seconds on the site i found
as far as looks, that is very subjective
 

Syringer

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
19,333
3
71
Apr 17, 2003
37,622
0
76
Originally posted by: mugsywwiii
Originally posted by: shady06
Originally posted by: mugsywwiii
Originally posted by: shady06

You're an idiot.

Originally posted by: RaiseUp

You're an idiot.

mugsywwiii, you're an idiot. see? that doesnt take too much skill

I thought Millennium was doing such a great job of proving it that I could just post my conclusions. However, if you insist... not all Maximas are automatics and not all Mustangs are manuals. I don't know why you brought that assumption into your argument.

most maximas are automatic
 
Apr 17, 2003
37,622
0
76
Originally posted by: Syringer

Well there goes any credibility about cars you ever had..

IMO, 1/4 mile times are a much more legtimate indicator of performance
 

Syringer

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
19,333
3
71
And you don't think there's just a slight correlation between 0-60 time and 1/4 mile time? Something along the lines of 99%?
 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
Originally posted by: shady06
Originally posted by: mugsywwiii
Originally posted by: shady06
Originally posted by: mugsywwiii
Originally posted by: shady06

You're an idiot.

Originally posted by: RaiseUp

You're an idiot.

mugsywwiii, you're an idiot. see? that doesnt take too much skill

I thought Millennium was doing such a great job of proving it that I could just post my conclusions. However, if you insist... not all Maximas are automatics and not all Mustangs are manuals. I don't know why you brought that assumption into your argument.

most maximas are automatic

Most cars in general are automatics. The quarter-mile times you posted are more likely from the manual version.
 

EXman

Lifer
Jul 12, 2001
20,079
15
81
just have your dad call your agent it is that simple these peeps here are just speculating...

oh and it is a bad idea :p
 
Apr 17, 2003
37,622
0
76
Originally posted by: Syringer
And you don't think there's just a slight correlation between 0-60 time and 1/4 mile time? Something along the lines of 99%?

i know there is a correlation, but like i said, once in a while you'll find a car that is slower 0-60 and actually wins the 1/4 mile. (on a side note i was reading an old issue of car and driver and there were several instance where a car is faster 0-60 and slower 0-100), so what not just at 1/4 to begin with?
 

Ultima

Platinum Member
Oct 16, 1999
2,893
0
0
A 16 year old driving a Mustang GT? Dude.. you start off with slow cars then when you learn how to drive you advance to something better.
It's like a guy learning to ride motorcycles starting off with a freakin' hayabusa or something like that.
 

Ultima

Platinum Member
Oct 16, 1999
2,893
0
0
Originally posted by: Evadman
When I was 18 I bought an '86 prelude for $1200. My insurance was $280 a month. Zero tickets, perfect driving record. And that was with the good student discount. Prepare to get raped.

You're the one who got raped, for sure. Why the hell were you paying 2x the value of your old POS per year? I never, ever paid that high insurance, for my old beaters it was more like $280 a year. Even with the 2003 protege I'm not
paying $280 a month. No offense but your post smells of BS.
 

Ultima

Platinum Member
Oct 16, 1999
2,893
0
0
Originally posted by: Scouzer
I'm 16, '88 Corsica 4 dr...

I pay $3200/yr for liability only...

WTF!!!
Seriously, wtf do you guys live that you're getting raped like that? WHen I bought my first car, a POS '88 Shadow, I was paying $400 CANADIAN a year for liability..
 

PowerMac4Ever

Banned
Dec 9, 2000
5,246
0
0
Now I'm not a big fan of domestic cars or Millennium... but jesus christ shady06, just stop posting. You're giving Nissan fanboys here a bad name. Your unwillingness to admit that you were wrong shows how ignorant you are.
 
Apr 17, 2003
37,622
0
76
Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
Now I'm not a big fan of domestic cars or Millennium... but jesus christ shady06, just stop posting. You're giving Nissan fanboys here a bad name. Your unwillingness to admit that you were wrong shows how ignorant you are.

i said i was wrong, maybe you should read the whole thread before posting
 

PowerMac4Ever

Banned
Dec 9, 2000
5,246
0
0
Originally posted by: shady06
Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
Now I'm not a big fan of domestic cars or Millennium... but jesus christ shady06, just stop posting. You're giving Nissan fanboys here a bad name. Your unwillingness to admit that you were wrong shows how ignorant you are.

i said i was wrong, maybe you should read the whole thread before posting
Maybe you should have stopped posting after being proven that the Mustang is faster than the Maxima instead of dragging the thread on. Good job, buddy.
 
Apr 17, 2003
37,622
0
76
Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
Originally posted by: shady06
Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
Now I'm not a big fan of domestic cars or Millennium... but jesus christ shady06, just stop posting. You're giving Nissan fanboys here a bad name. Your unwillingness to admit that you were wrong shows how ignorant you are.

i said i was wrong, maybe you should read the whole thread before posting
Maybe you should have stopped posting after being proven that the Mustang is faster than the Maxima instead of dragging the thread on. Good job, buddy.

nice try at trying to cover your tracks, you say i'm unwilling to admit i'm wrong, i say i did admit it, you go on to another statment....

little advice: stay away from law, i can just see "i rest my case" after an objection has been overruled :p
 

PowerMac4Ever

Banned
Dec 9, 2000
5,246
0
0
Originally posted by: shady06
Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
Originally posted by: shady06
Originally posted by: PowerMac4Ever
Now I'm not a big fan of domestic cars or Millennium... but jesus christ shady06, just stop posting. You're giving Nissan fanboys here a bad name. Your unwillingness to admit that you were wrong shows how ignorant you are.

i said i was wrong, maybe you should read the whole thread before posting
Maybe you should have stopped posting after being proven that the Mustang is faster than the Maxima instead of dragging the thread on. Good job, buddy.

nice try at trying to cover your tracks, you say i'm unwilling to admit i'm wrong, i say i did admit it, you go on to another statment....

You said the Maxima is faster
you were pwned
you said Maxima was equal
you were pwned
you admit maxima is faster
you talk about how you don't know much about cars
Also, between this points, you bring in other reasons why the maxima is the "better car"
later, you all of a sudden say that the maxima is a good car for "you"

Well, son, this thread wasn't about YOU, was it? No, you don't know anything about cars but still decided to bring your flawed arguments into this thread.

little advice: stay away from law, i can just see "i rest my case" after an objection has been overruled :p
you're an idiot.