He has a problem. Some weird tech thing with sexual desire involved or just the thrill of showing off. Who knows. It doesn't matter if he is married to a dog or Miss America, makes no difference that he still has a problem.
Is this really something new, where one can get sexual excitement assisted by technology without any actual one on one personal contact?
I suppose this is not that different from some guy whacking off to computer porn in the basement while the wife is upstairs asleep.
In the old days they had PlayBoy and Hustler magazine.
I never heard of someone sent off to get professional help because they subscribed to PlayBoy or watched porn on VHS.
How does a society regulate this?
And what is considered crossing the line?
In the future we may have the sex tubes like woody Allen envisioned in his movie SLEEPER.
Would using the sex tube be considered disqualifying for holding public office?
Especially when the guy is also married to Miss America 2075?
What is the difference between a glossy photo or a digital snapshot?
Sexting or computer porn?
PlayBoy or VHS porn?
And the whole time the little woman and the kids are all asleep upstairs.
If two consenting adults sext porn photos to each other, or just suggestive underwear photos showing a bulge here and there, should those individuals go to jail or be sent to some looney farm for sexual addiction treatment?
And what about DirecTV, Dish and Cable?
Plenty of porn there for easy access.
Should everyone with a satellite dish on their roof be sent off to some psychiatric institution?
Is this entire matter with Weiner blown up out of proportion?
Isn't this between him and his wife?
Did he actually commit a crime?
Or was a it all about the sleeping kid with him in his bed?
If mom and dad have a satellite dish on the roof and kids in the house, is that breaking the law?
And has anyone talked with Woody Allen about this?