The ONLY logical answer is to arm everyone. Oh and that applies to every other country. That means the leaders as well and with all that is available to them. We can sort this issue out really quick. It's truly the 'safest' bet.
Who exactly would survive this scenario?
So he is over 21, and it was a handgun.
Also arguably the most infamous school shooter, Virginia tech, was over 21, and also armed with a handgun.
Why the laser focus on AR-15 and the age of 21 then?
Is the only real solution here just no more guns?
Well what happens when a police officer discharges his weapon in a school? ABSOLUTELY no more guns?
What happens when there is a military base shooting - no we really mean it, no more guns.
They should arm the custodial staff to counteract any rogue teachers.
There's 14.5 million to 16 million concealed carry license holders. They already have guns. Most of those teachers, administrators and staff have training, they just need the authorization and additional training.Let’s take Trump’s idea of arming 20% of the teachers, that’s 700,000 guns. I’m sure the NRA and their handlers would love that purchase. Now, they’re trained, etc. Does anyone think that the kids won’t know who’s armed and who isn’t? Do you think that “info” won’t make its way out of school?
This is exactly why nobody but trained law enforcement needs to be in possession of a firearm.This is exactly why nobody but trained law enforcement needs to be in possession of a firearm at any school.
HOLY SHIT that's a lot of strawman there buddy!
Now we know who to blame when all the horses starve...
he was a teacher, that's the entire point here.
no one has said that adults can't kill people with handguns.
because the AR-15 is far more deadly than all other guns. as for the age issue, no one can justify a kid being able to buy a weapon that can kill before being able to buy a lottery ticket or alcohol.
no one is suggesting that, so why are you?
where are you getting such silly ideas? when a cop shoots an innocent person, no one suggests that all cops should have their guns taken away.
schools have nothing to do with military bases.
now, do you have any actual valid points to make about assault weapons and arming teachers?
HOLY SHIT that's a lot of strawman there buddy!
Now we know who to blame when all the horses starve...
But you are perfectly okay with an 18 year old defending your freedom with that rifle?
So you prefer a narrow focus on somewhere around 50-100 deaths per year of the AR-15 as opposed to the broad focus of 10,000+ per year as a result of handguns? Why do you need feel good legislation that doesn't make us any safer?
So he is over 21, and it was a handgun.
Also arguably the most infamous school shooter, Virginia tech, was over 21, and also armed with a handgun.
Why the laser focus on AR-15 and the age of 21 then?
Is the only real solution here just no more guns?
Well what happens when a police officer discharges his weapon in a school? ABSOLUTELY no more guns?
What happens when there is a military base shooting - no we really mean it, no more guns.
he was a teacher, that's the entire point here.
no one has said that adults can't kill people with handguns.
because the AR-15 is far more deadly than all other guns. as for the age issue, no one can justify a kid being able to buy a weapon that can kill before being able to buy a lottery ticket or alcohol.
no one is suggesting that, so why are you?
where are you getting such silly ideas? when a cop shoots an innocent person, no one suggests that all cops should have their guns taken away.
schools have nothing to do with military bases.
now, do you have any actual valid points to make about assault weapons and arming teachers?
But you are perfectly okay with an 18 year old defending your freedom with that rifle?
So you prefer a narrow focus on somewhere around 50-100 deaths per year of the AR-15 as opposed to the broad focus of 10,000+ per year as a result of handguns? Why do you need feel good legislation that doesn't make us any safer?
The longtime radio voice of Dalton High School football and basketball, who is facing charges after he fired at least one shot inside a classroom Wednesday, once tried to confess to having someone killed, police said.
The confession was one of two previous incidents involving Randal Davidson and local police.
Dalton police could not verify any of the information Davidson said on March 21, 2016, about having two friends kill someone on his behalf. Police ultimately took him to Hamilton Medical Center because he was having suicidal thoughts, according to a police report. The school was made aware of the incident, police said.
Then, in an incident in January 2017, Davidson disappeared from the high school campus after saying he didn’t feel well and leaving early. He was found hours later sitting on a curb about a mile away, unable or unwilling to respond to police, according to the report. He was again taken to the hospital and no further action was taken by officers.
Stressed out under appreciated, over worked PTA mom's? Sounds super safe. Let's do it!But we need guards for the custodial staff in case them AND the teachers go rogue. Maybe some PTA moms or something.
It's the only possible answer.
It isn't but you are using an almost one off vs the worst mass school killing in history.Without diving into better stats, off the top of my head I know the Brown's Chicken Massacre was 7 people with a revolver, is that more or less the sweet spot for you on a relatively acceptable level of deaths? When has a revolver ever saved anybody's life? Why is 7 okay?
Is that how it is in Communist countries? Good luck with that.This is exactly why nobody but trained law enforcement needs to be in possession of a firearm.
In your bubble reality, this kind of comment makes sense somehow, right?Is that how it is in Communist countries? Good luck with that.
Are you suggesting that we begin substituting guns for midol/pamprin and then shunt them into a local school for pms related activities?Stressed out under appreciated, over worked PTA mom's? Sounds super safe. Let's do it!
I never said i was perfectly ok with anything, so don't put words in my mouth. As for your stats, they're BS, and you know it. there are far more handguns out there than assault rifles.
Just raising my hand to say that I am suggesting we need to ban all guns. They are a net-negative for society. I'd be fine with them entrusted to tactical police teams and the military. Everyone else, regular cops included, can live without.
Just imagine what that would do for police interactions.
Hey, they sell Easy buttons at Staples.There's 14.5 million to 16 million concealed carry license holders. They already have guns. Most of those teachers, administrators and staff have training, they just need the authorization and additional training.
You either ban semi-automatic handguns outright or severely restrict access to them as well. I guess the main problem US authorities would face is there are so many firearms in circulation how would you get rid of them all?
www.news.com.au/national/australians-surrender-26000-firearms-as-part-of-the-national-gun-amnesty/news-story/7a935e5675ad868c009de1332052f179
