• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Another migrant caravan heading for the USA ...

Page 20 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
VRAMdemon said:
Lol...what's he gonna do if he moves all these troops down there and nobody from the "caravan" shows up
Click to expand...

It will obviously be declared a victory for Trump because his conclusion will be that his actions scared off the incoming invading horde, defending the southern border patriotically.
 
SlowSpyder said:
There was no muslim ban, that's a falsehood. Your only sentence was a lie... ffs. There was a ban on seven predominantly muslim countries.




Ephesians 6:5: "Slaves, obey your earthly masters with deep respect and fear. Serve them sincerely as you would serve Christ." Jesus must have been talking to the Democrats. Dance, puppet.
Click to expand...

wow. parroting out the old "in defense of slavery" verse from the Bible.

Dance, Massah.
 
SlowSpyder said:
Troops cost money. Don't blame us for having troops, blame these people that think they can just walk into a country as if borders do not exist.
Click to expand...

5000 waterboy troops aren't necessary to have against a poor civilian march of refugees.

BTW, what do you think Trump can legally have the troops do? Play waterboy.
 
Hayabusa Rider said:
You must be a Trump, not a Jesus, Christian then because Jesus certainly was "SJW". Perhaps you are ignorant about this man called Jesus, the Son of God.
Click to expand...

Interesting that Mexican Catholics still largely embrace the core ideals of charity and compassion laid down by Jesus while so many American christians have effectively disposed of them as inconvenient.
 
I've heard the numbers as being quoted all over the place. As few as 3k migrants to as many as 6k or 8k? based on various estimates from local municipalities where they have passed; and up to 1.5k or so apparently taking asylum in Mexico or just leaving the caravan.

I hope it's up to 12k or more, because we really need these immigrants. There are tons of jobs that need to be filled and our population is dying out quickly. Also, our lord and master Amathana recently authorized Prince Soros to construct 3 more abortion mega factories across the midwest. Each factory will have the capacity to process the abortions of 3,000 WASP women per month, so we will need these migrants and their babies to replace all of the necessarily-aborted WASP babies. So it has been said, and so it shall ever be. All hail lord Amathana, and his prince, Soros the Magnificent.
 
Hayabusa Rider said:
5000 waterboy troops aren't necessary to have against a poor civilian march of refugees.

BTW, what do you think Trump can legally have the troops do? Play waterboy.
Click to expand...

Well, considering that all estimates put the caravan at least 1 month away from the US border (assuming no impediments along the way), those "emergency" troops that were sent out for this weekend are going to need to be doing something to occupy their time. It will get really boring there.

Oh wait, could it be that this emergency deployment is only relevant to next week's election? Nah, not possible.
 
Fanatical Meat said:
Had this same problem on Facebook with a Trumper friend

“You’re for open boarders!”
Me: umm no

“You’re for letting criminals in!”
Me: if being an immigrant is criminal then yes but no I don’t want gangs or dealers or terrorists coming in

“You want to put them up in 5 star hotels! I want to live in one!”

Me: umm no I’ve never said that
Click to expand...



Did you suggest that if he would like to discuss borders, he should at least fucking learn to spell the word?
 
More examples of "peaceful refugees that just want to better themselves", uh huh.

On Monday, Mexican Interior Secretary Alfonso Navarrete Prida lamented what he called a second "violent attempt" to storm the border, accusing people of placing the elderly, pregnant women and children at the front, putting them at risk of being crushed.

The Interior Department said in a statement that two Hondurans ages 17 and 22 were arrested Monday when one of them tried to shoot at police in the town of Ignacio Zaragoza, near the Hidalgo border crossing. It said the Glock failed to fire, and no agents were injured.
Click to expand...

Guns and firebombs? Must be the new tools for farming, eh?

https://www.yahoo.com/news/1-migrant-dies-2nd-group-tries-force-entry-042048490.html

Damn Associated Press, full of rage and hate, eh? /s
 
dainthomas said:
The key to safety when fleeing ultra-violent drug gangs is to make sure you are completely unarmed.
Click to expand...

Do you know that it is ILLEGAL to bring any weapons, especially guns, into any sovereign nation? Oh, they were just "undocumented farming tools", right? 😀

Putting the elders, pregnant women, and children in harm way of being crush to death = excellent way to fight the drug gangs, right? Keep digging.
 
Svnla said:
Do you know that it is ILLEGAL to bring any weapon into any sovereign nation? Oh, they were just "undocumented farming tools", right? 😀
Click to expand...

Don't worry, it was probably only the "middle easterners" with the guns. The emperor's legions at the border will make sure they stay out.
 
dainthomas said:
Don't worry, it was probably only the "middle easterners" with the guns. The emperor's legions at the border will make sure they stay out.
Click to expand...

Oh, pulling the race card, right on cue = unable to debate with facts and logic.

No response about those individuals putting the elders, pregnant women, and children in danger? Hmmm....

Scroll up this thread and see my post about everyone (no exception) should follow current immigration rules and laws. See the part of "no exception"? Uh huh. Keep digging deeper.
 
Svnla said:
Oh, pulling the race card, right on cue = unable to debate with facts and logic.

No response about those individuals putting the elders, pregnant women, and children in danger? Hmmm....

Scroll up this thread and see my post about everyone (no exception) should follow current immigration rules and laws. See the part of "no exception"? Uh huh. Keep digging deeper.
Click to expand...

Your fuhrer brought up the (debunked) allegations about middle easterners. But you knew that.

I agree they should follow the law about declaring themselves at the border and requesting asylum.
 
Svnla said:
Oh, pulling the race card, right on cue = unable to debate with facts and logic.

No response about those individuals putting the elders, pregnant women, and children in danger? Hmmm....

Scroll up this thread and see my post about everyone (no exception) should follow current immigration rules and laws. See the part of "no exception"? Uh huh. Keep digging deeper.
Click to expand...
So, should the US also adhere to the law and allow those people to apply for asylum? You said no exceptions. right?
 
soundforbjt said:
So, should the US also adhere to the law and allow those people to apply for asylum? You said no exceptions. right?
Click to expand...

Sure, they can apply but they can't expect to apply then demand to stay in the US with the promise to show up later in court and then blow off their appointments, lay low ILLEGALLY for a few years, then demand rights and privileges as LEGAL immigrants.

They can stay in tents at the border as Australia is doing right now with "refugees" seeking asylum. Funny how the number of those "refugees" drops off dramatically after that policy was strictly enforced by Ausssies. Talk about magic. 😀
 
Last edited:
dainthomas said:
Your fuhrer brought up the (debunked) allegations about middle easterners. But you knew that.

I agree they should follow the law about declaring themselves at the border and requesting asylum.
Click to expand...

Did mention anything about DT? Nope, nada, zip. Talk about sheer desperation to spin. Tst, tst, tst.
 
Svnla said:
Sure, they can apply but they can't expect to apply then demand to stay in the US with the promise to show up later in court and then blow off their appointments, lay low ILLEGALLY for a few years, then demand rights and privileges as LEGAL immigrants.

They can stay in tents at the border as Australia is doing right now with "refugees". Funny how the number of those "refugees" drops off dramatically after that policy was strictly enforced by Ausssies.
Click to expand...
What does the law actually say? Does it say they have to stay in tents?
 
soundforbjt said:
What does the law actually say? Does it say they have to stay in tents?
Click to expand...

Unlike typical PN poster, I don't' pretend to be an expert about what exactly the US law says. What I said above was about Australia handling of "refugees" and we all know how many of you love to cite Australia when it fits your agenda. What good for the goose is good. for.........??? RIght?

https://www.aljazeera.com/programme...ia-tough-border-policies-160915133845743.html

Ok, ILLEGALS supporters, where are the screamings of "hate" and "xenophobic" and "racist" and other nasty names and labels for Aussies? LOL.
 
Last edited:
Once again, the people in the caravan, should they ever even make it to the US border, are not intending to the US illegally. The intent is to request asylum which, in the highly unlikely event it is granted, is a form of legal immigration.

Do I need to put that in all caps so that Svnla can understand it?
 
Vic said:
Once again, the people in the caravan, should they ever even make it to the US border, are not intending to the US illegally. The intent is to request asylum which, in the highly unlikely event it is granted, is a form of legal immigration.

Do I need to put that in all caps so that Svnla can understand it?
Click to expand...

Since you mentioned my name so I will reply in kind.

So you think we will just let them in and then later they will show up in court as promised?

Funny how you would NOT dare to reply to my post about how violent those "refugees" are. Calm and calculated as your claim, eh? You were saying something about understand it?
 
Vic said:
Once again, the people in the caravan, should they ever even make it to the US border, are not intending to the US illegally. The intent is to request asylum which, in the highly unlikely event it is granted, is a form of legal immigration.

Do I need to put that in all caps so that Svnla can understand it?
Click to expand...

He just loves getting worked up into a self righteous snit over illegals, nasty cheaters that they are. Or something, something deeply irrational.
 
Jhhnn said:
He just loves getting worked up into a self righteous snit over illegals, nasty cheaters that they are. Or something, something deeply irrational.
Click to expand...

Oh, and look at Associated Press, look how mean and nasty they are to write bad things about those "refugees", how violent they really are. Right? Talk about irrational. 😀

Spin baby spin.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top