- Aug 23, 2003
- 25,375
- 142
- 116
You and the entire forum.Originally posted by: venkman
Did I watch a completely different interview from the OP?
I wish we still had thread ratings; this one is a perfect 10/10.
You and the entire forum.Originally posted by: venkman
Did I watch a completely different interview from the OP?
Originally posted by: soonerproud
Yes we are arguing the same things. You have not once shown how Governors affect what the Federal Government does when it comes to foreign policy. The fact is they have little say so in the executive decision of the Federal Government. My point about the Federal Government having responsibility in case of invasion (which you did bring up concerning Russia in a previous post.) is to point out that Governors have no control on what the Feds do.
1.) No shit
2.) Ditto
3.) She is
4.) No Shit again
5.) She is aware of the policies that directly affect her State. Read the interview again. She was very well versed on Russia and was well aware of the mechanics of current foreign policy. Her trip to Afghanistan and Iraq prove she is very involved in the parts of foreign policy that directly affect her state.
Lets see here, lame duck President, overextended forces, policies being followed directly opposite of what is stated policy = dead policy.
Originally posted by: Caveman
Please. A "big topic of debate"? The subject of attacking another country yes, but calling that the "Bush Doctrine". That's a stretch.
The "Bush Doctrine" is a "pretty official" term? I'd guess it's much more official among the "villify GWB crowd". The phrase has a pejoritive ring, one I doubt a republican VP is going to openly embrace (even if it was common).
At any rate, the "Bush Doctrine" can't certainly be credited to GWB. It sounds much like the old philosophy of manifest destiny revamped.
Originally posted by: Gonad the Barbarian
That Bush doctrine question would have thrown me too. I'm not sure that is an official term with a hard and narrow definition.
Originally posted by: JeffreyLebowski
Originally posted by: Gonad the Barbarian
That Bush doctrine question would have thrown me too. I'm not sure that is an official term with a hard and narrow definition.
The Bush Doctrine is a term coined by Democrats that means anything that happens in a America that hasa negative effect on the nation was Bush's fault one way or another.
Originally posted by: JeffreyLebowski
Originally posted by: Gonad the Barbarian
That Bush doctrine question would have thrown me too. I'm not sure that is an official term with a hard and narrow definition.
The Bush Doctrine is a term coined by Democrats that means anything that happens in a America that hasa negative effect on the nation was Bush's fault one way or another.
Originally posted by: JeffreyLebowski
Originally posted by: Gonad the Barbarian
That Bush doctrine question would have thrown me too. I'm not sure that is an official term with a hard and narrow definition.
The Bush Doctrine is a term coined by Democrats that means anything that happens in a America that hasa negative effect on the nation was Bush's fault one way or another.
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Work on your reading comprehension. I did not say governors affect federal foreign policy, I said federal foreign policy can affect them. If you think that only the actions of Russia and Canada can affect her state you are hopelessly naive. Even though she can't control something, it will still affect her state and she needs to know about it. My entire point was that other things in the world will affect her state, so she should know how we interface with the world. She obviously did not. That is a gross oversight on her part.
I am unaware of any trip Palin has ever made to Iraq or Afghanistan. When did this occur?
As far as your poor analysis of the Bush Doctrine goes, that deserves its own thread. Simply put, it is far from dead.
she made two foreign trips last summer, one of which was to Canada. On the second, sponsored by the Pentagon, she traveled to Kuwait and Germany -- and made a short stop at a "military outpost" in Iraq -- to visit members of the Alaska National Guard deployed there, according to Palin spokeswoman Maria Comella. Comella added that Palin may have visited Mexico on a personal trip.
Originally posted by: soonerproud
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Work on your reading comprehension. I did not say governors affect federal foreign policy, I said federal foreign policy can affect them. If you think that only the actions of Russia and Canada can affect her state you are hopelessly naive. Even though she can't control something, it will still affect her state and she needs to know about it. My entire point was that other things in the world will affect her state, so she should know how we interface with the world. She obviously did not. That is a gross oversight on her part.
I am unaware of any trip Palin has ever made to Iraq or Afghanistan. When did this occur?
As far as your poor analysis of the Bush Doctrine goes, that deserves its own thread. Simply put, it is far from dead.
I think we are getting our wires crossed here. I never said she should not interface with the world, just that she is not going to know every detail of US foreign policy including the specifics of what the Bush Doctrine means. She has interfaced with the world as Governor including trips to the troops in Germany, Kuwait and Iraq. (It was Kuwait and Iraq, not Afghanistan she visited. My mistake.)
Official Alaska Press Release
she made two foreign trips last summer, one of which was to Canada. On the second, sponsored by the Pentagon, she traveled to Kuwait and Germany -- and made a short stop at a "military outpost" in Iraq -- to visit members of the Alaska National Guard deployed there, according to Palin spokeswoman Maria Comella. Comella added that Palin may have visited Mexico on a personal trip.
CBS News Article
You say dormant and I say dead. Either way the doctrine is not being practiced at this time.
Originally posted by: HomerJS
McCain already reinforced it. He is quoted knowing what we know now he would go into Iraq again. That war was a preemtive strike...aka Bush Doctrine
Originally posted by: soonerproud
I think we are getting our wires crossed here. I never said she should not interface with the world, just that she is not going to know every detail of US foreign policy including the specifics of what the Bush Doctrine means. She has interfaced with the world as Governor including trips to the troops in Germany, Kuwait and Iraq. (It was Kuwait and Iraq, not Afghanistan she visited. My mistake.)
* * *
You say dormant and I say dead. Either way the doctrine is not being practiced at this time.
Originally posted by: soonerproud
Originally posted by: HomerJS
McCain already reinforced it. He is quoted knowing what we know now he would go into Iraq again. That war was a preemtive strike...aka Bush Doctrine
Not really. McCain was critical of the handling of the war from the start, including trying to fight it on the cheap and the complete dismantling of the Iraqi Government and forces. If he had handled the war, we would have been out of Iraq by now. We were right to finish the job we left undone for humanitarian reasons. The reasons Bush sold to the country were fucking wrong, but there were other great reasons to depose Saddam including the killing of millions of innocent Iraqis and Iranians.
Originally posted by: OneOfTheseDays
^Were you always this dumb?
Originally posted by: Don Vito Corleone
Your apologism is frankly kind of embarrassing. What I see in this thread is a lot of people who are ignorant of the basics of our recent foreign policy (I don't mean to presume you fit into that category) defending Sarah Palin's ignorance on the same subject. The difference is that she, unlike anyone here, is running for Vice President, a heartbeat away from the Presidency, under a 72-year-old President with a history of cancer and severe traumatic injury.
I applaud Governor Palin's trips to the middle east, but it concerns me that she had never even had a passport before taking office as governor. I frankly question whether a person who reaches age 42 without ever leaving the US can possibly be the most effective emissary for our country overseas, which is typically one of the VP's most important functions. Her ignorance of the Bush Doctrine, which is THE core military philosophy underlying the two wars in which thousands of Americans have died in the past seven years, is simply shocking IMO.
As it relates to your last point, your assertion that the Bush Doctrine "is not being practiced at this time" reflects your own apparent failure to understand what it is. Last I checked, several Americans were still dying every week in Iraq, a country which posed no apparent threat (and certainly no imminent threat) to the US when we attacked it. I will be happy when the Bush Doctrine is finally dead, but it probably won't happen for a while.
Originally posted by: Don Vito Corleone
Originally posted by: Caveman
Please. A "big topic of debate"? The subject of attacking another country yes, but calling that the "Bush Doctrine". That's a stretch. You make it sound like starting in 2003, people all over the states were whispering a new buzzward while sipping their morning coffee... "Hey Bob... How about that Bush Doctrine... pretty crazy, huh?"
The "Bush Doctrine" is a "pretty official" term? I'd guess it's much more official among the "villify GWB crowd". The phrase has a pejoritive ring, one I doubt a republican VP is going to openly embrace (even if it was common).
At any rate, the "Bush Doctrine" can't certainly be credited to GWB. It sounds much like the old philosophy of manifest destiny revamped.
FYI: I do not support Bush/Palin or GWB.
With all due respect, your post reveals a startling level of ignorance for someone who purports to be interested in the news. I was an active-duty military officer when the Bush Doctrine was implemented. It is taught under that name at all military officer colleges, including the Army War College, which all Army O-5s are required to attend in order to reach Colonel.
It's funny you would characterize the Bush Doctrine as an adaptation of manifest destiny - in fact that sounds like a extremely leftist view in that manifest destiny was a rationalization for America's territorial expansion, whereas the Bush Doctrine is couched in (at least theoretical) self-defense. Dick Cheney would pop a blood vessel if you said that in his presence.
Originally posted by: OneOfTheseDays
The average folk AIN'T RUNNING FOR MOTHERFUCKING VICE PRESIDENT YOU DUMB FUCK
Originally posted by: OneOfTheseDays
Oh God it gets even better
PALIN: Charlie, you're in Alaska. We have that very narrow maritime border between the United States, and the 49th state, Alaska, and Russia. They are our next door neighbors.We need to have a good relationship with them. They're very, very important to us and they are our next door neighbor.
GIBSON: What insight into Russian actions, particularly in the last couple of weeks, does the proximity of the state give you?
PALIN: They're our next door neighbors and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.
GIBSON: What insight does that give you into what they're doing in Georgia?
PALIN: Well, I'm giving you that perspective of how small our world is and how important it is that we work with our allies to keep good relation with all of these countries, especially Russia.
Originally posted by: Don Vito Corleone
Again, you totally fail to understand what the Bush Doctrine means. McCain was in favor of war in Iraq even before Bush was. Hell, arguably it should be called the McCain Doctrine. Meanwhile, he continues to be even more adamant about the war than President Bush is.
You should probably stop posting until you have time to do a little casual reading. You might want to start with this article from Parameters, the Army War College Quarterly.
And the Democrats have the least qualified candidate at the top of the ticket in modern history... think about it.Originally posted by: OneOfTheseDays
I don't understand why Republicans consistently set the bar so low for themselves and their candidates. When we elect unqualified people into office, everyone loses. Think about it.
That can't be the real transcript, can it?Originally posted by: OneOfTheseDays
Oh God it gets even better
PALIN: Charlie, you're in Alaska. We have that very narrow maritime border between the United States, and the 49th state, Alaska, and Russia. They are our next door neighbors.We need to have a good relationship with them. They're very, very important to us and they are our next door neighbor.
GIBSON: What insight into Russian actions, particularly in the last couple of weeks, does the proximity of the state give you?
PALIN: They're our next door neighbors and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.
GIBSON: What insight does that give you into what they're doing in Georgia?
PALIN: Well, I'm giving you that perspective of how small our world is and how important it is that we work with our allies to keep good relation with all of these countries, especially Russia.
