Originally posted by: Gibsons
Every serious guitarist I know of uses a tube amp. Couldn't tell you anything about the Line 6 though. As for the AD30, does it sound like an AC30?
Originally posted by: mrrman
I was thinking of buying the Line 6 Spider amp and was told to stay away from them. Do you use a tube amp? I was thinking of the VOX AD30VT Valvetronix amp. Any thoughts? Thanks
Originally posted by: Fritzo
Originally posted by: Gibsons
Every serious guitarist I know of uses a tube amp. Couldn't tell you anything about the Line 6 though. As for the AD30, does it sound like an AC30?
That's a load. Musicians use what they think sounds good to them. Today's solid state amps are actually very good, and Line6 has some outstanding products. Their Spider series is top notch and I'd recommend it.
Originally posted by: Gibsons
Originally posted by: Fritzo
Originally posted by: Gibsons
Every serious guitarist I know of uses a tube amp. Couldn't tell you anything about the Line 6 though. As for the AD30, does it sound like an AC30?
That's a load. Musicians use what they think sounds good to them. Today's solid state amps are actually very good, and Line6 has some outstanding products. Their Spider series is top notch and I'd recommend it.
Every guitarist (rock/blues types) I've bothered to discuss the subject with prefers and plays through tubes, almost exclusively despite the fact that they are a major PITA.
YMMV /shrug
Agreed and what sounds good is subject to change, relative to what they think is making a particular tone, irrespective of the actual signal chain.Originally posted by: Fritzo
Originally posted by: Gibsons
Every serious guitarist I know of uses a tube amp. Couldn't tell you anything about the Line 6 though. As for the AD30, does it sound like an AC30?
That's a load. Musicians use what they think sounds good to them. Today's solid state amps are actually very good, and Line6 has some outstanding products. Their Spider series is top notch and I'd recommend it.
Tube amps are great....but only for playing loud. They don't start to shine until you crank them to at least 1/3 volume- not something you want to do for practicing at home. They also take a good 20 minutes to warm up, and you need to take the tubes out of them during transport or be faced with broken tubes by the time you get to your gig.
This contradicts the actual philosophy of gigging gear (at least in my mind) which is to say "less equipment is better". or perhaps, "the more uses one piece can have, the better."If you're going to be gigging- sure! Get a tube amp. If this is for practice, by all means get a solid state amp. Like I said, Line6 is very good. They really know what they're doing with their modeling technology.
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
I recommend getting one that goes to 11.
Originally posted by: mrrman
I was thinking of buying the Line 6 Spider amp and was told to stay away from them. Do you use a tube amp? I was thinking of the VOX AD30VT Valvetronix amp. Any thoughts? Thanks
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
Line 6 amps aren't a good choice for people who need a serious amp.
i'll qualify that by saying they make good practice amps, since they sound "good enough" at bedroom levels, but when it comes time to play with a band, they just won't cut it. they sound worse the louder you push them, and start to sound really tinny, cold, and harsh. at one point in my band's practice space, we had about 7 big amps at our disposal: a custom Marshall DSL100, two Marshall JCM900's, 2 Marshall JCM800's, a Marshall Valvestate 100, and a Line 6 200 watt head. we also occasionally had access to a Mesa Boogie Double Rectifier. everyone who came through agreed that the Line 6 was by far the worst sounding amp, even the guy who owned it. the Line 6 was the butt of many running jokes.
Originally posted by: AlienCraft
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
Line 6 amps aren't a good choice for people who need a serious amp.
i'll qualify that by saying they make good practice amps, since they sound "good enough" at bedroom levels, but when it comes time to play with a band, they just won't cut it. they sound worse the louder you push them, and start to sound really tinny, cold, and harsh. at one point in my band's practice space, we had about 7 big amps at our disposal: a custom Marshall DSL100, two Marshall JCM900's, 2 Marshall JCM800's, a Marshall Valvestate 100, and a Line 6 200 watt head. we also occasionally had access to a Mesa Boogie Double Rectifier. everyone who came through agreed that the Line 6 was by far the worst sounding amp, even the guy who owned it. the Line 6 was the butt of many running jokes.
You're comparing apples to pears... same family, but different tastes and therefore different applications.
Modeling amps are, by their nature, designed to be used in conjunction with Sound Reinforcement gear to take them to the levels that develop when a group play together.
Simply because an amp will develop 200 watts RMS does not mean that it will be twice as loud as another amp that develops 100 watts RMS.
Speaker cabinet design and transducer selection will always be the variable as to stage SPL developed.
QFTOriginally posted by: NL5
Originally posted by: AlienCraft
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
Line 6 amps aren't a good choice for people who need a serious amp.
i'll qualify that by saying they make good practice amps, since they sound "good enough" at bedroom levels, but when it comes time to play with a band, they just won't cut it. they sound worse the louder you push them, and start to sound really tinny, cold, and harsh. at one point in my band's practice space, we had about 7 big amps at our disposal: a custom Marshall DSL100, two Marshall JCM900's, 2 Marshall JCM800's, a Marshall Valvestate 100, and a Line 6 200 watt head. we also occasionally had access to a Mesa Boogie Double Rectifier. everyone who came through agreed that the Line 6 was by far the worst sounding amp, even the guy who owned it. the Line 6 was the butt of many running jokes.
You're comparing apples to pears... same family, but different tastes and therefore different applications.
Modeling amps are, by their nature, designed to be used in conjunction with Sound Reinforcement gear to take them to the levels that develop when a group play together.
Simply because an amp will develop 200 watts RMS does not mean that it will be twice as loud as another amp that develops 100 watts RMS.
Speaker cabinet design and transducer selection will always be the variable as to stage SPL developed.
A 200 Watt amp is not twice as loud as 100 watt amp. Doesn't work that way. A 100 watt amp is about twice as loud as a 10 watt amp. Also, tube amps work differently than a SS amp. A 100 watt tube amp will push more spl's/db's than a 300 watt SS amp.
Originally posted by: Chris
Originally posted by: mrrman
I was thinking of buying the Line 6 Spider amp and was told to stay away from them. Do you use a tube amp? I was thinking of the VOX AD30VT Valvetronix amp. Any thoughts? Thanks
Valvetronix is not a tube amp. It's a modeler that uses a tube in the power amp stage at very low wattage for a more natural sounding distortion. It's quite good at what it does but it's technically not a tube amp.
Yes I know...just got tired of looking and went this way
An amplifier is not "loud" until it is connected to a transducer aka speaker. Furthermore identical speakers will have different outputs depending upon the type of enclosure they are mounted in.Originally posted by: NL5
Originally posted by: AlienCraft
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
Line 6 amps aren't a good choice for people who need a serious amp.
i'll qualify that by saying they make good practice amps, since they sound "good enough" at bedroom levels, but when it comes time to play with a band, they just won't cut it. they sound worse the louder you push them, and start to sound really tinny, cold, and harsh. at one point in my band's practice space, we had about 7 big amps at our disposal: a custom Marshall DSL100, two Marshall JCM900's, 2 Marshall JCM800's, a Marshall Valvestate 100, and a Line 6 200 watt head. we also occasionally had access to a Mesa Boogie Double Rectifier. everyone who came through agreed that the Line 6 was by far the worst sounding amp, even the guy who owned it. the Line 6 was the butt of many running jokes.
You're comparing apples to pears... same family, but different tastes and therefore different applications.
Modeling amps are, by their nature, designed to be used in conjunction with Sound Reinforcement gear to take them to the levels that develop when a group play together.
Simply because an amp will develop 200 watts RMS does not mean that it will be twice as loud as another amp that develops 100 watts RMS.
Speaker cabinet design and transducer selection will always be the variable as to stage SPL developed.
A 200 Watt amp is not twice as loud as 100 watt amp. Doesn't work that way. A 100 watt amp is about twice as loud as a 10 watt amp. Also, tube amps work differently than a SS amp. A 100 watt tube amp will push more spl's/db's than a 300 watt SS amp.
Originally posted by: mrrman
More equipment is bought using this process than any other. except "Name Brand".Originally posted by: Chris
Originally posted by: mrrman
I was thinking of buying the Line 6 Spider amp and was told to stay away from them. Do you use a tube amp? I was thinking of the VOX AD30VT Valvetronix amp. Any thoughts? Thanks
Valvetronix is not a tube amp. It's a modeler that uses a tube in the power amp stage at very low wattage for a more natural sounding distortion. It's quite good at what it does but it's technically not a tube amp.
Yes I know...just got tired of looking and went this way
:thumbsup:
Originally posted by: AlienCraft
An amplifier is not "loud" until it is connected to a transducer aka speaker. Furthermore identical speakers will have different outputs depending upon the type of enclosure they are mounted in.Originally posted by: NL5
Originally posted by: AlienCraft
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
Line 6 amps aren't a good choice for people who need a serious amp.
i'll qualify that by saying they make good practice amps, since they sound "good enough" at bedroom levels, but when it comes time to play with a band, they just won't cut it. they sound worse the louder you push them, and start to sound really tinny, cold, and harsh. at one point in my band's practice space, we had about 7 big amps at our disposal: a custom Marshall DSL100, two Marshall JCM900's, 2 Marshall JCM800's, a Marshall Valvestate 100, and a Line 6 200 watt head. we also occasionally had access to a Mesa Boogie Double Rectifier. everyone who came through agreed that the Line 6 was by far the worst sounding amp, even the guy who owned it. the Line 6 was the butt of many running jokes.
You're comparing apples to pears... same family, but different tastes and therefore different applications.
Modeling amps are, by their nature, designed to be used in conjunction with Sound Reinforcement gear to take them to the levels that develop when a group play together.
Simply because an amp will develop 200 watts RMS does not mean that it will be twice as loud as another amp that develops 100 watts RMS.
Speaker cabinet design and transducer selection will always be the variable as to stage SPL developed.
A 200 Watt amp is not twice as loud as 100 watt amp. Doesn't work that way. A 100 watt amp is about twice as loud as a 10 watt amp. Also, tube amps work differently than a SS amp. A 100 watt tube amp will push more spl's/db's than a 300 watt SS amp.
This is the basis of many an "audiophile's" argument for/against BOSE speaker products, is it not?
Isn't it true that the class of amplifier will determine the output capabilities of an amplifier , irrespective of the type output devices (silicon/ et al , vacuum tube) ?
I'll admit up front to being very rusty as to amp design technicalities, so if I'm off base there, please chalk it up to old guy / "70's being good to me" kinda thing.
But input levels and speaker enclosure type are as important to output level (in spl) as amp output rating, afaik.
Something doesn't compute.Originally posted by: NL5
Tube amps are louder per watt. My 18 watt Marshall will make yours ears bleed. Seriously. It is louder than any 100 watt SS amp I have ever heard. WAY louder.Originally posted by: AlienCraft
An amplifier is not "loud" until it is connected to a transducer aka speaker. Furthermore identical speakers will have different outputs depending upon the type of enclosure they are mounted in.Originally posted by: NL5
Originally posted by: AlienCraft
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
Line 6 amps aren't a good choice for people who need a serious amp.
i'll qualify that by saying they make good practice amps, since they sound "good enough" at bedroom levels, but when it comes time to play with a band, they just won't cut it. they sound worse the louder you push them, and start to sound really tinny, cold, and harsh. at one point in my band's practice space, we had about 7 big amps at our disposal: a custom Marshall DSL100, two Marshall JCM900's, 2 Marshall JCM800's, a Marshall Valvestate 100, and a Line 6 200 watt head. we also occasionally had access to a Mesa Boogie Double Rectifier. everyone who came through agreed that the Line 6 was by far the worst sounding amp, even the guy who owned it. the Line 6 was the butt of many running jokes.
You're comparing apples to pears... same family, but different tastes and therefore different applications.
Modeling amps are, by their nature, designed to be used in conjunction with Sound Reinforcement gear to take them to the levels that develop when a group play together.
Simply because an amp will develop 200 watts RMS does not mean that it will be twice as loud as another amp that develops 100 watts RMS.
Speaker cabinet design and transducer selection will always be the variable as to stage SPL developed.
A 200 Watt amp is not twice as loud as 100 watt amp. Doesn't work that way. A 100 watt amp is about twice as loud as a 10 watt amp. Also, tube amps work differently than a SS amp. A 100 watt tube amp will push more spl's/db's than a 300 watt SS amp.
This is the basis of many an "audiophile's" argument for/against BOSE speaker products, is it not?
Isn't it true that the class of amplifier will determine the output capabilities of an amplifier , irrespective of the type output devices (silicon/ et al , vacuum tube) ?
I'll admit up front to being very rusty as to amp design technicalities, so if I'm off base there, please chalk it up to old guy / "70's being good to me" kinda thing.
But input levels and speaker enclosure type are as important to output level (in spl) as amp output rating, afaik.