Another example of McCain's bad judgement

[Craig234]

It's just irresponsible and suggests something wrong with him, IMO.

link

 

[nageov3t]

maybe he has more faith and hope in the american people than Obama. 😉

 

[Tab]

Sounds like a publicity stunt.

 

[Thump553]

It is highly irresponsible for a presumptive candidate to refuse secret service coverage. Looking coldly at the situation, if he gets killed the GOP is out millions and their best chance at holding the White House.

And the word is spelled "judgment."

 

[Harvey]

Originally posted by: Thump553

... if he gets killed the GOP is out millions and their best chance at holding the White House.

And the word is spelled "judgment."

I wouldn't want to see him or any Presidential candidate shot, and it would cause huge political and social distress, but the two consequenses you note would be the up side of it.

 

[blackangst1]

Originally posted by: Harvey

Originally posted by: Thump553

... if he gets killed the GOP is out millions and their best chance at holding the White House.

And the word is spelled "judgment."

I wouldn't want to see him or any Presidential candidate shot, and it would cause huge political and social distress, but the two consequenses you note would be the up side of it.

But you want a sitting president murdered? 😕

 

[Harvey]

Originally posted by: blackangst1

Originally posted by: Harvey

Originally posted by: Thump553

... if he gets killed the GOP is out millions and their best chance at holding the White House.

And the word is spelled "judgment."

I wouldn't want to see him or any Presidential candidate shot, and it would cause huge political and social distress, but the two consequenses you note would be the up side of it.

But you want a sitting president murdered? 😕

Grow up. :roll:

 

[ebaycj]

Originally posted by: Craig234
It's just irresponsible and suggests something wrong with him, IMO.

link

The question is: Why did he not also refuse military coverage while taking a "stroll through a farmers market" in the middle of Baghdad ?

 

[Tab]

Originally posted by: ebaycj

Originally posted by: Craig234
It's just irresponsible and suggests something wrong with him, IMO.

link

The question is: Why did he not also refuse military coverage while taking a "stroll through a farmers market" in the middle of Baghdad ?

He can afford private security in this circumstance.

 

[nageov3t]

Originally posted by: ebaycj

Originally posted by: Craig234
It's just irresponsible and suggests something wrong with him, IMO.

link

The question is: Why did he not also refuse military coverage while taking a "stroll through a farmers market" in the middle of Baghdad ?

you really think he had a choice?

how f'd would the commander have been if something happened under his watch? I'm sure he didn't personally ask for the helicopters and all that shit.

 

[blackangst1]

Originally posted by: Harvey

Originally posted by: blackangst1

Originally posted by: Harvey

Originally posted by: Thump553

... if he gets killed the GOP is out millions and their best chance at holding the White House.

And the word is spelled "judgment."

I wouldn't want to see him or any Presidential candidate shot, and it would cause huge political and social distress, but the two consequenses you note would be the up side of it.

But you want a sitting president murdered? 😕

Grow up. :roll:

I just like pointing out your hypocrisy 😀 Youre so emotional lighten up its a friggin messageboard

 

[dahunan]

Originally posted by: Tab
Sounds like a publicity stunt.

Bingo .. and who is gonna kill Colonel Sanders anyways

 

[Corbett]

Originally posted by: Harvey

Originally posted by: blackangst1

Originally posted by: Harvey

Originally posted by: Thump553

... if he gets killed the GOP is out millions and their best chance at holding the White House.

And the word is spelled "judgment."

I wouldn't want to see him or any Presidential candidate shot, and it would cause huge political and social distress, but the two consequenses you note would be the up side of it.

But you want a sitting president murdered? 😕

Grow up. :roll:

The truth hurts! Good one Blackangst!

 

[palehorse]

you're really reaching with this one...

 

[Craig234]

Originally posted by: palehorse74
you're really reaching with this one...

No, I'm not. You are simply a very blind and partisan apologist for one side, so you see things with huge distortion. There's not much I know that can help you, unfortunately. It's a little like seeing people who went through the great depression, or who were racist before the civil rights era - they are sort of stuck with a mindset affected by that.

 

[Corn]

Originally posted by: Craig234
It's just irresponsible and suggests something wrong with him, IMO.

link

I agree. I can totally see some deranged libtard.......maybe Harvey with his psychotic rantings and ravings, or Lemon Law with his Bush execution fantasies........attempt to off McCain in order to save America from teh eval GOP.




I kid........maybe. 😉

 

[Craig234]

Originally posted by: Thump553
It is highly irresponsible for a presumptive candidate to refuse secret service coverage. Looking coldly at the situation, if he gets killed the GOP is out millions and their best chance at holding the White House.

That and other factors - there's simply the reality of a nation of 300 million people and the fact there are some disturbed people, as John Lennon or Ronald Reagan would tell you.

And the word is spelled "judgment."[/quote]

I would love to get a spelling correction. You should check your facts before posting one, though, as both spellings are correct.

 

[palehorse]

Originally posted by: Craig234

Originally posted by: palehorse74
you're really reaching with this one...

No, I'm not. You are simply a very blind and partisan apologist for one side, so you see things with huge distortion. There's not much I know that can help you, unfortunately. It's a little like seeing people who went through the great depression, or who were racist before the civil rights era - they are sort of stuck with a mindset affected by that.

Hey genius, I'm an Obama supporter, I've never been a member of any political party, and you're still reaching if you think this issue demonstrates bad judgment by McCain.

Originally posted by: Craig234
I would love to get a spelling correction. You should check your facts before posting one, though, as both spellings are correct.

Oh, I guess you're bloody British now... :roll:

 

[Tab]

Originally posted by: palehorse74

Originally posted by: Craig234

Originally posted by: palehorse74
you're really reaching with this one...

No, I'm not. You are simply a very blind and partisan apologist for one side, so you see things with huge distortion. There's not much I know that can help you, unfortunately. It's a little like seeing people who went through the great depression, or who were racist before the civil rights era - they are sort of stuck with a mindset affected by that.

Hey genius, I'm an Obama supporter, I've never been a member of any political party, and you're still reaching if you think this issue demonstrates bad judgment by McCain.

Craig234, is just confused and is talking about himself in that last post. 😉

 

[Jaskalas]

Only P&N could care so much for the safety of the GOP as to warrant an assault on the very issue.

Originally posted by: Thump553
It is highly irresponsible for a presumptive candidate to refuse secret service coverage. Looking coldly at the situation, if he gets killed the GOP is out millions and their best chance at holding the White House.

And the word is spelled "judgment."

GOP abandoned its values to nominate McCain. After that they can win nothing. I wouldn't call it a loss actually.

 

[JD50]

Originally posted by: Craig234

Originally posted by: palehorse74
you're really reaching with this one...

No, I'm not. You are simply a very blind and partisan apologist for one side, so you see things with huge distortion. There's not much I know that can help you, unfortunately. It's a little like seeing people who went through the great depression, or who were racist before the civil rights era - they are sort of stuck with a mindset affected by that.

LOL, I would say "pot meet kettle", but PH is supporting a Dem this go around....

 

[Craig234]

Originally posted by: Tab

Originally posted by: palehorse74

Originally posted by: Craig234

Originally posted by: palehorse74
you're really reaching with this one...

No, I'm not. You are simply a very blind and partisan apologist for one side, so you see things with huge distortion. There's not much I know that can help you, unfortunately. It's a little like seeing people who went through the great depression, or who were racist before the civil rights era - they are sort of stuck with a mindset affected by that.

Hey genius, I'm an Obama supporter, I've never been a member of any political party, and you're still reaching if you think this issue demonstrates bad judgment by McCain.

Craig234, is just confused and is talking about himself in that last post. 😉

There's always a bottom feeder around to take the false cheap shot.

 

[Craig234]

Originally posted by: JD50

Originally posted by: Craig234

Originally posted by: palehorse74
you're really reaching with this one...

No, I'm not. You are simply a very blind and partisan apologist for one side, so you see things with huge distortion. There's not much I know that can help you, unfortunately. It's a little like seeing people who went through the great depression, or who were racist before the civil rights era - they are sort of stuck with a mindset affected by that.

LOL, I would say "pot meet kettle", but PH is supporting a Dem this go around....

Oh, go ahead and say it - you're pot, Palehorse is kettle. And see my previous post.

Ideology can be broader than party-based, it can be about other things.

 

[Tab]

:roll: I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that John McCain is probably smarter than you, me and probably everyone that posts on this board.

 

[JD50]

Originally posted by: Craig234

Originally posted by: JD50

Originally posted by: Craig234

Originally posted by: palehorse74
you're really reaching with this one...

No, I'm not. You are simply a very blind and partisan apologist for one side, so you see things with huge distortion. There's not much I know that can help you, unfortunately. It's a little like seeing people who went through the great depression, or who were racist before the civil rights era - they are sort of stuck with a mindset affected by that.

LOL, I would say "pot meet kettle", but PH is supporting a Dem this go around....

Oh, go ahead and say it - you're pot, Palehorse is kettle. And see my previous post.

Ideology can be broader than party-based, it can be about other things.

That doesn't even make sense. Nice try though.