Originally posted by: phreaqe
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: bignateyk
Bad owners tend to want to own dogs with a perceived "coolness" factor. If all those same owners owned labs, and raised and treated them the same way, they would turn out pretty bad.
Sure, there are dog breeds that are more naturally protective or aggressive, but it is all about how they are raised. The reason for so many pit attacks is because pit bulls are the favorite dog of stupid owners.
I have been around many pit bulls raised in loving, caring households, and they are just about the most calm, adorable dogs in the world.
/agreed. I love my pit, he's awesome. But in many cases the best thing to do is put the dog down because once it's human aggressive you don't want to take the chance that it will attack a human again. I think the OP should bring a bat and take it out if it attacks him.
those pitbulls you know may be very calm and adorable, but it seems to me that they are the most easy to snap and become human aggressive. yes alot of stupid owners get them, but i believe that is only part of the problem.
you are really treating it to much as it being the dog. It is not, it is the human.
They are not an easy dog to raise, true. But there are many other hard breeds to raise, i.e. just not a dog for first time dog owners, and yet they don't receive the attention.
Dobermans used to have the spotlight as "bad breed" when all the thugs and drug runners would own that dog, and ruined the day for people who owned dobermans and were responsible owners. Dobies are amazing dogs, extremely intelligent and loving. They can be aggressive the moment you put it in the wrong hands. Rottweilers are the same way. I've actually yet to personally meet an aggressive Rottie.
Shepherds (of all kinds, including Aussies), Labs, and all sorts of Terrier breeds... essentially... all dogs are capable of aggression if raised improperly.
Most dogs are capable of being an extremely loyal and loving animal who never shows a hint of aggression even when strangers come close. And guess what, all the terriers (which includes pit bulls) are extremely capable of being that loving care-free dog.
Some dogs have different personality too. Our female lab/australian shepherd mix? She would have been the queen bitch of the pack. She desires to have the alpha female role, and is very protective of anything in her sight - a very farm dog style. She requires a lot of persistence in leadership to get her to submit to the concept that she isn't in charge. If we slacked off at our job, she could easily be a dog that attacks strangers if she got out. We still can't be sure she wouldn't, so we take our precautions and take heed to make sure she knows she submits to us and our desire to well, not harm passing strangers.
Essentially, all I am saying is don't hate the breed. That is what gets us in these situations, with the government banning ownership of certain dog breeds because people are idiots.
It was Dobermans, and then Rottweilers, and now its Pit Bulls. They are the cool dog. They are seen as the dog with the aggressive stance, the one that's ready to protect the owner. These owners just want that look, and well... they want the actual aggression matching the look, that, and they are shitty dog owners who can't raise them properly anyhow. You can raise a dog for aggression and still make that dog completely safe to be around for strangers. It's called training them to be aggressive when you command them to be, but that is a VERY difficult thing to do, a lot of owners can't raise dogs that way. I'm pretty sure I probably couldn't until I've owned a few dogs, and I had a dog that was smarter.
If the cool dog was a different breed, that breed would be the one in the papers.
And the media rarely covers any incidents with breeds that aren't the "bad breed" at the time.