Anger Showing Among Special Operations Forces

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
F

finglobes

Senior member
Dec 13, 2010
739
0
0
Lying about Benghazi by Obama et al has angered people in intelligence and military communities. It wasn't long ago that the Navy SEALs who died volunteering their help were being described by Susan Rice as part of an inept Consulate security team. Members of the military and intelligence communities are starting to openly take on Obama in public.

The other day the CIA (and so Petraeus) issued a public statement saying that nobody at CIA had blocked help for Americans in need. On Friday a retired Lt Col took to the radio airwaves to tell the public exactly how the communication and decision trees relating to Benghazi work. He said there is no way the decision not to help didn't originate from anyone other than Obama and he explains why.

Now other retired special forces members have come together to make a video protesting what Obama is doing. This is in addition to other SEALS who made earlier protest videos, and the parents who are in the media every day now demanding answers. I've read a lot of comments online by people who say they have cried over this affair and the parents plight

I've never seen military and intelligence community (active and retired) members turning on a president in public like this. Americans tend to have more respect for the military than any other institution. Even if Obama wins re-election I don't see how he could ever heal this now open wound. As Larry Johnson posted

"The anger in the SpecOps community over Obama’s failure to respond in force and act decisively in Libya is at a boiling point. Obama has awakened a sleeping beast"

The Lt Col who called the radio was quite fascinating in his "inside baseball" descriptions. He said he was speaking at some risk to himself:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=lljKmmZyCiw
military caller says that Obama ordered no response to Benghazi attack

Here the retired Special Ops guys came together for a recent video:

http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/73922/special-operations-speaks/#more-73922
 
3

3DVagabond

Lifer
Aug 10, 2009
11,951
204
106
finglobes said:
Lying about Benghazi by Obama et al has angered people in intelligence and military communities. It wasn't long ago that the Navy SEALs who died volunteering their help were being described by Susan Rice as part of an inept Consulate security team. Members of the military and intelligence communities are starting to openly take on Obama in public.

The other day the CIA (and so Petraeus) issued a public statement saying that nobody at CIA had blocked help for Americans in need. On Friday a retired Lt Col took to the radio airwaves to tell the public exactly how the communication and decision trees relating to Benghazi work. He said there is no way the decision not to help didn't originate from anyone other than Obama and he explains why.

Now other retired special forces members have come together to make a video protesting what Obama is doing. This is in addition to other SEALS who made earlier protest videos, and the parents who are in the media every day now demanding answers. I've read a lot of comments online by people who say they have cried over this affair and the parents plight

I've never seen military and intelligence community (active and retired) members turning on a president in public like this. Americans tend to have more respect for the military than any other institution. Even if Obama wins re-election I don't see how he could ever heal this now open wound. As Larry Johnson posted

"The anger in the SpecOps community over Obama’s failure to respond in force and act decisively in Libya is at a boiling point. Obama has awakened a sleeping beast"

The Lt Col who called the radio was quite fascinating in his "inside baseball" descriptions. He said he was speaking at some risk to himself:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=lljKmmZyCiw
military caller says that Obama ordered no response to Benghazi attack

Here the retired Special Ops guys came together for a recent video:

http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/73922/special-operations-speaks/#more-73922
Click to expand...

You don't expect Obama to do any shooting this close to the election, do you? More Americans were shot this Friday night in Chicago than on Sept. 11th in Benghazi. That's just life in the big city for Obama.
 
glenn1

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
3DVagabond said:
You don't expect Obama to do any shooting this close to the election, do you? More Americans were shot this Friday night in Chicago than on Sept. 11th in Benghazi. That's just life in the big city for Obama.
Click to expand...

Unlike inner city crackheads and gangbangers, people actually care if an Ambassador gets shot.
 
EagleKeeper

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
"The people responsible will be brought to Justice"

(As long as we do not piss off anyone)
 
K1052

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,394
45,846
136
Shocking news that a birther and anti-Obama PAC founder doesn't like the President. Film at 11.
 
S

Smoblikat

Diamond Member
Nov 19, 2011
5,184
107
106
K1052 said:
Shocking news that a birther and anti-Obama PAC founder doesn't like the President. Film at 11.
Click to expand...

So because of his opinions on two issues anything he says that could possibly be negative against obama is immediately disregarded? You sir are a dumbass.
 
F

finglobes

Senior member
Dec 13, 2010
739
0
0
I meant to add more earlier but Anand went into maintenance mode after I posted.

A main consideration is how this strife between a sitting POTUS and military/intelligence is perceived by bad actors abroad.

When Carter lost the country and showed weakness, there were people and countries that knew they could behave in a sketchy fashion without much fear of any backlash (USSR in Afghanistan, Iranians taking hostages etc).

The Lt Col calling on radio said too many people are afraid to act for fear of a screw-up like happened with Carter and his rescue attempt (Desert One).

No matter if Obama wins or loses I think it would be fair to expect to see some serious liberty taking. If Obama loses I don't think any country would fear much in the way of a reprisal. Obama's whole vibe is like a substitute teacher who doesn't have control when he's in the room and things get even worse when he leaves it.

This whole situation is even more dangerous than it looks today and it looks bad. I expect an eventful next couple of months that will make Carter's end of term look good.
 
DominionSeraph

DominionSeraph

Diamond Member
Jul 22, 2009
8,386
32
91
Smoblikat said:
So because of his opinions on two issues anything he says that could possibly be negative against obama is immediately disregarded?
Click to expand...

A proved bad source can be disregarded as being a useful, trustworthy source, yes.

You do realize that nothing on this forum is life or death, don't you?
Dumbass.
 
D

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
Obama is the one who approved ongoing drone strikes in Pakistan and who had Bin Laden killed, so I take any comments about him being unwilling to commit forces with a giant shaker of salt.

On military matters he's been at least as much of a hawk as Bush, except that he didn't start an unnecessary ground war that killed more Americans than 9/11.
 
IronWing

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
72,669
33,536
136
finglobes said:
I meant to add more earlier but Anand went into maintenance mode after I posted.

A main consideration is how this strife between a sitting POTUS and military/intelligence is perceived by bad actors abroad.

When Carter lost the country and showed weakness, there were people and countries that knew they could behave in a sketchy fashion without much fear of any backlash (USSR in Afghanistan, Iranians taking hostages etc).

The Lt Col calling on radio said too many people are afraid to act for fear of a screw-up like happened with Carter and his rescue attempt (Desert One).
...
This whole situation is even more dangerous than it looks today and it looks bad. I expect an eventful next couple of months that will make Carter's end of term look good.
Click to expand...
Carter lost the support of the military due to the inevitable post-Viet Nam downsizing of the officer corps. Career soldiers found themselves careerless. Carter's supposed weakness not found.
 
Lemon law

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
Only democrats bumble, and while democrats lie people die. Which perfectly explains why no one died during the Marine baracks bombing in Beruit under Reagan's watch, and no one died during 911, under GWB's watch.

Just keep repeating after me, "the GOP never screws up, but when things go wrong, blame it on a democrat." Just keep repeating it as many times as it takes to believe it.
 
R

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
What exactly IS Obama doing that right-wing people are getting so worked up about? If ever there was outrage in search of a justification, this is it.
 
R

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
monovillage said:
The funny part is that it's a classical stonewall/coverup. Nixon is probably laughing in his grave right now.
Click to expand...

At most I see the information being presented changing as time goes by. If you believe the administration, and so far Republicans have provided no factual reason not to, it's because the information changed as it was developed and intelligence was gathered. Basically I see Republicans absolutely desperate to make this into a big anti-Obama story and very little factual support for doing so.

I don't think this is really classical anything, because it's hard to think of as good of an example of a manufactured scandal as this.
 
3

3DVagabond

Lifer
Aug 10, 2009
11,951
204
106
glenn1 said:
Unlike inner city crackheads and gangbangers, people actually care if an Ambassador gets shot.
Click to expand...

Well, I was talking about why Obama doesn't care. He'd be pretty callous being a Chicago politician. I doubt he puts government officials lives above anyone Else's and he'd let them die rather than chance starting anything this close to the election.

Not to go off topic, but as far as gangbangers and crackheads go, we should care about them. If not for humanitarian reasons, then because nobody cared about the drug gangs in Mexico or the Taliban, until they took over.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom