Who cares if you "trained" them? Being a trainer doesn't qualify you as a talent scout, offensive coordinator, NFL head coach, general manager, or anything of that nature. You have no quarterback knowledge. Period. Listen to the experts who talk about RGIII's lack of fundamentals, his poor pocket presence, etc. If you had QB knowledge, you wouldn't have made half the arguments you made. My favorite was you guys trying to tell me that RGIII was only running when he "had" to. I flip on a Redskins game and sure enough, practically every other play was a read option. You guys were either dishonest or again, lack football knowledge. At least some people here admit they were wrong. I've been wrong before (see: Jeff George) and I'll be wrong again, but I'll admit it and move on.
Anyone making it to the NFL is generally a top athlete. You sitting here and screaming that RGIII is a great athlete and you know because you "trained" quarterbacks is laughable. The Redskins and other NFL teams have trainers that have FAR more experience than you do and look what has happened. Also, Vick (to name just one) was a top athlete and had a lackluster QB career. Jamarcus Russell, Jeff George, Ryan Leaf, and Jay Cutler have had some of the strongest arms in the league and none had great careers. Athletic attributes are just one component. It is the other attributes that set an NFL QB apart from the competition and this is where RGIII is lacking. Do you seriously think Tom Brady or Peyton Manning are (or ever were) elite athletes compared to the rest of the NFL? Of course not. Do you think Joe Montana was a great athlete compared to other NFL athletes in his day? Do you think he had a top arm? Of course not.
lol, you have no idea what you're talking about.
these commentators, former players, coaches, etc. have been saying that rg3 has talent and potential and he's just not there yet. secondly, i have more knowledge when it comes to rehab than the trainers at redskins park... having been there and being a former doctor to a couple of the players and former official chiropractor and physical therapy provider to the redskins, i have some first-hand knowledge.
fundamentals, like footwork, is tied to his core stability, which was weak. pocket presence, however, is something he has developed but still can't trust with a sorry excuse for an offensive line... every quarterback who started ended up learning the lesson not to trust the offensive line, whether it was rg3, mccoy, or cousins. it isn't because they all suck, it's because if you can't trust the pocket, you don't have mental clarity to know who to throw to because you're constantly watching your back and your line.
until the offensive line gets figured out and rg3 plays a complete season, i don't feel it's fair to declare him a bust. if he stays healthy and the offensive line improves and he still gets sacked a lot and has bad footwork, THEN i'll be fine with calling him a bust. his footwork and release has improved significantly, though, so he's clearly learning from his mistakes.
gray cook and greg rose both told me, when they did the fms on him after his knee was rehabbed, that he scored close to perfect and should have no problem being developed back to his normal playing for. unfortunately, rg3 wasn't there mentally... he was still shellshocked from the knee injury and wasn't fully ready to return.
the trainers should be focusing on rg3's core stability, cross-crawl patters, and stabilizing his genu valgus collapse with some lateral mobility/glute medius training. they aren't however. instead, they've got him lifting weights, which does next to nothing for him, and they have him lifting incorrectly, i might add.
i'm not arguing that rg3 is awesome. i'm arguing that rg3 has loads of potential that isn't being tapped into. if you have an investment on a player like him, you have to protect and develop it properly. well, the redskins are not. i've written letter after letter to dan snyder to get new atc's and better physical therapists... didn't get any response.
i'm not arguing that andrew luck sucks. i'm arguing that andrew luck is overrated. his pocket presence and mechanics are good and he's got solid core stability, but he doesn't have accuracy and he hasn't had a difficult schedule in the nfl yet. does that mean he sucks? no. it means he's overrated. does he have potential? yes.
russell wilson has it all, so far. his team and trainers have tapped into russell wilson's potential. the seahawks are a disciplined team who prehabs and even gets players to see sports psychologists in order to get them into an optimal mental space when they go out and play. whatever negative things i may have said about him in the past (which i don't remember if i did or didn't, i'm just going off of what andrew luck's jock strap, indycoltsfan, said), i was wrong about that. he's awesome.
i just believe that rg3 can be the same type of player that russell wilson, except faster and with a stronger arm, so long as he has trainers and coaches who will develop him to get to that form. it's the reason why i really, really want darrell bevell as the head coach in washington.