Andrew Breitbart dead at 43

[xBiffx]

Republicans think Dems had Andrew rubbed out:

3-3-2012

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/cutline...BzdGNhdANob21lBHB0A3NlY3Rpb25zBHRlc3QD;_ylv=3

Andrew Breitbart death sparks conspiracy theories



Andrew Breitbart's unexpected death on Thursday has sparked a swift outpouring of grief and remembrances--but also the inevitable conspiracy theories about the timing of the outspoken conservative's demise.


Speaking at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington, D.C., last month, Breitbart claimed he had damning videos of Barack Obama, and planned to release them before the general election.

Steve Bannon, producer of "The Undefeated" and a friend of Breitbart's, told Fox News' Sean Hannity on Thursday that the tapes of Obama at Harvard do exist, and that they would be released "in a week or two."

"In a stunning coincidence," Paul Joseph Watson wrote on InfoWars.com, "it appears Andrew Breitbart suffered his untimely death just hours before he was set to release damning video footage that could have sunk Barack Obama's 2012 re-election campaign."

"I'm going to reiterate what I said before," a commenter wrote on InfoWars.com. "In my opinion THIS GUY GOT ELIMINATED. Plain and simple." And another wrote: "Anybody who gets too close to the truth will be killed."

Complete troll post. Not once is republican and democrat mentioned in the story you linked. Liar.

 

[zinfamous]

Complete troll post. Not once is republican and democrat mentioned in the story you linked. Liar.

OK, well...there is a bit of technical correctness to your statement, but do you expect these people who are close friends of Brietbart, trying to bring down the president by going on Fox and insuring his videos "will be released," to be democrats accusing republicans, or republicans accusing democrats?

try not to attack crazy with your own brand of crazy. It does you no service.

😛

 

[xBiffx]

OK, well...there is a bit of technical correctness to your statement, but do you expect these people who are close friends of Brietbart, trying to bring down the president by going on Fox and insuring his videos "will be released," to be democrats accusing republicans, or republicans accusing democrats?

try not to attack crazy with your own brand of crazy. It does you no service.

😛

The accusations in his link have nothing to do with R or D. It is simply AB supporters vs. AB haters. Sure some are likely to fit into R and D but his link says nothing about this. This is why it is trolling. He specifically pits R's against D's when its not necessary.

Thread derailment, trolling, lying. Reported but of course nothing will happen.

 

[zinfamous]

The accusations in his link have nothing to do with R or D. It is simply AB supporters vs. AB haters. Sure some are likely to fit into R and D but his link says nothing about this. This is why it is trolling. He specifically pits R's against D's when its not necessary.

Thread derailment, trolling, lying. Reported but of course nothing will happen.

wait--so you think Dave's post, right there, is the one that derailed and trolled this thread?

😵

come on, It's obvious that you know the leanings of the people in that article. You clearly aren't stupid. Demanding direct reference to avoid claims of lying is a bit pathetic in this case.

Just admit that you're grasping at straws, here.

😛

 

[xBiffx]

wait--so you think Dave's post, right there, is the one that derailed and trolled this thread?

😵

come on, It's obvious that you know the leanings of the people in that article. You clearly aren't stupid. Demanding direct reference to avoid claims of lying is a bit pathetic in this case.

Just admit that you're grasping at straws, here.

😛

First you admit you're defending the undefendable.

Doesn't matter what you think is the case, what Dave said was blatant lying and trolling. I don't have to grasp at anything. I read what he posted, both the article and his own words.

I'm done arguing about it. Nothing will happen anyways as is typical.

 

[zinfamous]

First you admit you're defending the undefendable.

Doesn't matter what you think is the case, what Dave said was blatant lying and trolling. I don't have to grasp at anything. I read what he posted, both the article and his own words.

I'm done arguing about it. Nothing will happen anyways as is typical.

All I am saying is that with Dave's history, all over the forums and in this thread, you have taken an exceedingly weak position over a comparatively benign post of his. Hence, you're grasping at straws here when you energy would best be spent attacking other posts of his, if that is your goal.

And what, exactly, is indefensible?

 

[TeeJay1952]

I never cared for Breitbart in life but I will be damned if I will stoop to his level once he is dead. RIP and condolences to his family. If you don't like someones behavior why would you emulate it?

 

[fskimospy]

All I am saying is that with Dave's history, all over the forums and in this thread, you have taken an exceedingly weak position over a comparatively benign post of his. Hence, you're grasping at straws here when you energy would best be spent attacking other posts of his, if that is your goal.

And what, exactly, is indefensible?

Seriously, Dave makes worse posts than that on a daily, if not hourly basis. Why that one?

 

[zinfamous]

I never cared for Breitbart in life but I will be damned if I will stoop to his level once he is dead. RIP and condolences to his family. If you don't like someones behavior why would you emulate it?

This is why:

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

😉

 

[theeedude]

In case you were holding your breath to find out what dirt Breitbart got on Obama in his "vetting," here it is:

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/03/04/obama-alinsky-love-song

Apparently Obama appeared on a discussion panel after a play about Saul Alinsky in 1998. Some other people on the panel with him may have been socialists, which as we all know is contagious and could make Obama a socialist too.Yep, that's "The Vetting, Part I." You can decide for yourself if this is worth whipping yourself into a coronary over.

 

[monovillage]

In case you were holding your breath to find out what dirt Breitbart got on Obama in his "vetting," here it is:

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/03/04/obama-alinsky-love-song

Apparently Obama appeared on a discussion panel after a play about Saul Alinsky in 1998. Some other people on the panel with him may have been socialists, which as we all know is contagious and could make Obama a socialist too.Yep, that's "The Vetting, Part I." You can decide for yourself if this is worth whipping yourself into a coronary over.

I saw that this morning, I didn't even think it merited it's own thread.

 

[werepossum]

In case you were holding your breath to find out what dirt Breitbart got on Obama in his "vetting," here it is:

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/03/04/obama-alinsky-love-song

Apparently Obama appeared on a discussion panel after a play about Saul Alinsky in 1998. Some other people on the panel with him may have been socialists, which as we all know is contagious and could make Obama a socialist too.Yep, that's "The Vetting, Part I." You can decide for yourself if this is worth whipping yourself into a coronary over.

We already knew that, if we read "Dreams from my father". Dude was a virulent socialist. Either it faded or he acquired massive patience.

I think it's self-evident that Obama is squeaky clean for a politician. If the Clinton machine can't dig up dirt, and the Chicago machine's various factions can't dig up dirt, dirt is not to be found. Therefore if someone promises dirt, it probably means "I didn't find any dirt but I still need ratings."

 

[soundforbjt]

In case you were holding your breath to find out what dirt Breitbart got on Obama in his "vetting," here it is:

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/03/04/obama-alinsky-love-song

Apparently Obama appeared on a discussion panel after a play about Saul Alinsky in 1998. Some other people on the panel with him may have been socialists, which as we all know is contagious and could make Obama a socialist too.Yep, that's "The Vetting, Part I." You can decide for yourself if this is worth whipping yourself into a coronary over.

You know what? Andrew Breitbart appeared on Bill Maher's show, guess that made him a liberal.

 

[zinfamous]

You know what? Andrew Breitbart appeared on Bill Maher's show, guess that made him a liberal.

So, if association and physical presence is all it takes for belief systems to be communicable, and knowing that Anne Coulter and Bill Maher are great "friends," ...does this mean that Anne Coulter's mouth is all filled up with socialist ideas?

On a regular basis.



:sneaky:

 

[MomentsofSanity]

So, if association and physical presence is all it takes for belief systems to be communicable, and knowing that Anne Coulter and Bill Maher are great "friends," ...does this mean that Anne Coulter's mouth is all filled up with socialist ideas?

On a regular basis.



:sneaky:

Damn you for making me laugh like a little girl at that!

 

[werepossum]

So, if association and physical presence is all it takes for belief systems to be communicable, and knowing that Anne Coulter and Bill Maher are great "friends," ...does this mean that Anne Coulter's mouth is all filled up with socialist ideas?

On a regular basis.



:sneaky:

Why Coulter's mouth? Why not Maher's mouth?

'Tis better to give than to receive.

 

[hal2kilo]

...Casey Jones you better watch your speed,
Trouble ahead, trouble behind,
Man you know the notion,
Just crossed my mind

 

[zinfamous]

Why Coulter's mouth? Why not Maher's mouth?

'Tis better to give than to receive.

:hmm:

Are you suggesting what I think you're suggesting?




:sneaky:

 

[werepossum]

...Casey Jones you better watch your speed,
Trouble ahead, trouble behind,
Man you know the notion,
Just crossed my mind

Love that song, but I'm missing the reference.

Think I'll play it now . . .

 

[OrByte]

"some people say" he went out like david carradine....

/Fox news reporting

 

[theeedude]

Segments of video Breitbart thought would sink Obama. More guilt by association, as expected, so expect the man he's speaking about to be smeared.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=tz3qShugQ9I

I think Obama looks really great on it though, amazing how articulate and polished he was in his 20s.
The guy he's speaking of is professor Derrick Bell, who died last year. So I guess the irony here is that the recently deceased guy, who we aren't supposed to speak ill of, is going to smear another recently deceased guy to bash Obama by association.

 

[Linflas]

Love that song, but I'm missing the reference.

Think I'll play it now . . .

He left out "driving that train high on cocaine" so I assume he is implying with 0 evidence of drug involvement that cocaine did him in.

 

[momeNt]

Segments of video Breitbart thought would sink Obama. More guilt by association, as expected, so expect the man he's speaking about to be smeared.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=tz3qShugQ9I

I think Obama looks really great on it though, amazing how articulate and polished he was in his 20s.
The guy he's speaking of is professor Derrick Bell, who died last year. So I guess the irony here is that the recently deceased guy, who we aren't supposed to speak ill of, is going to smear another recently deceased guy to bash Obama by association.

Apparently the whole video is being released tonight on Fox News.

Probably will be doctored beyond belief, hopefully the voiceover is at least somewhat believable.

 

[xBiffx]

Probably will be doctored beyond belief

Birther. :whiste:

 

[sandorski]

Segments of video Breitbart thought would sink Obama. More guilt by association, as expected, so expect the man he's speaking about to be smeared.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=tz3qShugQ9I

I think Obama looks really great on it though, amazing how articulate and polished he was in his 20s.
The guy he's speaking of is professor Derrick Bell, who died last year. So I guess the irony here is that the recently deceased guy, who we aren't supposed to speak ill of, is going to smear another recently deceased guy to bash Obama by association.

Pocket abuse!