ThisIsMatt
Banned
- Aug 4, 2000
- 11,820
- 1
- 0
Originally posted by: ThisIsMatt
pocketpcpassion.com?
hahahaha, how sad is that...
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: ThisIsMatt
pocketpcpassion.com?
hahahaha, how sad is that...
What's wrong with that? It's a website about PocketPC's. There's PocketPC Passion and PocketPC Thoughts.
Originally posted by: MrBond
I'm way more leary about TigerDirect than any large retailer like BB/CUSA, maybe it's just the size difference. I've heard a lot of really bad stuff about tigerdirect over in the HD forum (search the archived threads there for 'Tigerdirect' if you're boredWow, sounds like a lot of Best Buy/CompUSA stories that I've read (minus the price club thing).)
Originally posted by: Leejai
it's funny how the forum mod keeps defending the company.
I think there is a very big difference in saying that TeK N Toys was charging credit cards before they should, and in what has actually happened, since they were not doing it, someone else was.
It makes no difference who's charging for them. Poor guys who bought from them. Has anyone checked their reseller ratings?
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: Leejai
it's funny how the forum mod keeps defending the company.
I think there is a very big difference in saying that TeK N Toys was charging credit cards before they should, and in what has actually happened, since they were not doing it, someone else was.
It makes no difference who's charging for them. Poor guys who bought from them. Has anyone checked their reseller ratings?
yeah I got on and posted this.
I used to own a computer store. now i own part of a few car dealerships. them claiming they didnt know that the CC place was doing it without there knowledge is wrong.
lol.I do feel that any situation can be rectified but both sides must come to a COMPERMISE.
Originally posted by: GtPrOjEcTX
lol.I do feel that any situation can be rectified but both sides must come to a COMPERMISE.
Originally posted by: cpals
The moderator replied again with some more lame excuses backing that guy up.
Apparently Anandtech moderators can moderate other moderators as well.Originally posted by: yllus
That moderator is a little puss who obviously is more worried about losing advertising dollars from this little n00b company rather than holding them to good strict business practices. BAN!
Originally posted by: Nohr
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: Anubis
heres another one to avoid
http://www.resellerratings.com/seller2375.html
gawd damn!:Q
Jesus! :Q
"They offered me a battery which I said came with it and he snapped that it didn't. I asked if it was a retail box, and he said no, that would cost $137 more. I should have canceled at that time. When the package arrived they had charged $90 shipping for a 5lb package. They never did say what shipping would be."
Kind of reminds me of the bumper sticker that I saw yesterday:IN THE END. Tekntoys you loose. I lost $37 you lost customers. This is your business a way of living be little more NICE
Originally posted by: Anubis
heres another one to avoid
http://www.resellerratings.com/seller2375.html
Originally posted by: littlepuss
Being called childish names doesn't bother me much. They end up being more of a reflection on the person using them. What does bother me is being accused of defending a sleezy company or doing it to protect advertising dollars.
There are a number of things you should know before shooting off at the mouth in that manner. First I am only a moderator for the site. I have no financial stake in it, whatsoever. Secondly the company in question doesn't even advertise on the site....had you taken the time to research this before spewing off at the mouth you would know that, but it it easier to just be slanderous isn't it. Next, it doesn't matter "a hill of beans" to me if this company is successful or not. What does matter to me are the members we have at that site, and how they are informed. As a moderator I could have done the easy thing and closed that thread long before I did. I could have stayed out of the fight. I could have let people freely post whatever they liked....BUT I CHOSE NOT TOO! I chose to take the difficult route. I chose to take a great deal of time out of several of my work days to deal with this matter in an attempt to have our members receive a balanced view of the matter. I didn't have to do it but I did. I knew very early on it was going to go sour, yet I chose to take the stance I did. I did it in full knowledge that some fool somewhere would end up calling me something like a "little puss" for it. If it were to happen again tomorrow I would still take the same stance, because the worst thing that would happen to me is someone woulkd call me a little puss. The best thing that could happen is that people would come away with a proper view of the situation and make their own choice based on fact, not embellished nonsense. If they choose to believe that they should not do business with them fine, but at least let them have the opportunity to make an informed decision.
Dave Evans
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteve
Originally posted by: littlepuss
I highly doubt they're going to do much better whether or not you censor the thread.
The guy from Tekntoys is a dumbass. He ought to realize, "Slander is spoken, in print it's libel."![]()
Umm... Dude, get it right... I censored none of the comments people made about Tec N Toys I only pointed out their inaccuarcies. I can't argue with the the rest of your statement though.![]()
Originally posted by: littlepuss
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteve
Originally posted by: littlepuss
I highly doubt they're going to do much better whether or not you censor the thread.
The guy from Tekntoys is a dumbass. He ought to realize, "Slander is spoken, in print it's libel."![]()
Umm... Dude, get it right... I censored none of the comments people made about Tec N Toys I only pointed out their inaccuarcies. I can't argue with the the rest of your statement though.![]()
Main Entry: 1cen·sor
Pronunciation: 'sen(t)-s&r
Function: noun
Etymology: Latin, from censEre to give as one's opinion, assess; perhaps akin to Sanskrit samsati he praises
1 : one of two magistrates of early Rome acting as census takers, assessors, and inspectors of morals and conduct
2 : one who supervises conduct and morals: as a : an official who examines materials (as publications or films) for objectionable matter b : an official (as in time of war) who reads communications (as letters) and deletes material considered sensitive or harmful
3 : a hypothetical psychic agency that represses unacceptable notions before they reach consciousness
Not by #2, but #3 works, considering you locked the thread to prevent more posting on the subject.
WAH WAH WAH. Your heroic stance and victimization is breaking my heart, really, it is!Originally posted by: littlepuss
Being called childish names doesn't bother me much. They end up being more of a reflection on the person using them. What does bother me is being accused of defending a sleezy company or doing it to protect advertising dollars.
There are a number of things you should know before shooting off at the mouth in that manner. First I am only a moderator for the site. I have no financial stake in it, whatsoever. Secondly the company in question doesn't even advertise on the site....had you taken the time to research this before spewing off at the mouth you would know that, but it it easier to just be slanderous isn't it. Next, it doesn't matter "a hill of beans" to me if this company is successful or not. What does matter to me are the members we have at that site, and how they are informed. As a moderator I could have done the easy thing and closed that thread long before I did. I could have stayed out of the fight. I could have let people freely post whatever they liked....BUT I CHOSE NOT TOO! I chose to take the difficult route. I chose to take a great deal of time out of several of my work days to deal with this matter in an attempt to have our members receive a balanced view of the matter. I didn't have to do it but I did. I knew very early on it was going to go sour, yet I chose to take the stance I did. I did it in full knowledge that some fool somewhere would end up calling me something like a "little puss" for it. If it were to happen again tomorrow I would still take the same stance, because the worst thing that would happen to me is someone woulkd call me a little puss. The best thing that could happen is that people would come away with a proper view of the situation and make their own choice based on fact, not embellished nonsense. If they choose to believe that they should not do business with them fine, but at least let them have the opportunity to make an informed decision.
Dave Evans
Originally posted by: yllus
What you should realize is that your ability to neutrally comment upon the dealings of one of your advertisers is severely limited. ....................................... This lesson from the School of Common Sense brought to you by yllus.
Originally posted by: littlepuss
Being called childish names doesn't bother me much. They end up being more of a reflection on the person using them. What does bother me is being accused of defending a sleezy company or doing it to protect advertising dollars.
There are a number of things you should know before shooting off at the mouth in that manner. First I am only a moderator for the site. I have no financial stake in it, whatsoever. Secondly the company in question doesn't even advertise on the site....had you taken the time to research this before spewing off at the mouth you would know that, but it it easier to just be slanderous isn't it. Next, it doesn't matter "a hill of beans" to me if this company is successful or not. What does matter to me are the members we have at that site, and how they are informed. As a moderator I could have done the easy thing and closed that thread long before I did. I could have stayed out of the fight. I could have let people freely post whatever they liked....BUT I CHOSE NOT TOO! I chose to take the difficult route. I chose to take a great deal of time out of several of my work days to deal with this matter in an attempt to have our members receive a balanced view of the matter. I didn't have to do it but I did. I knew very early on it was going to go sour, yet I chose to take the stance I did. I did it in full knowledge that some fool somewhere would end up calling me something like a "little puss" for it. If it were to happen again tomorrow I would still take the same stance, because the worst thing that would happen to me is someone woulkd call me a little puss. The best thing that could happen is that people would come away with a proper view of the situation and make their own choice based on fact, not embellished nonsense. If they choose to believe that they should not do business with them fine, but at least let them have the opportunity to make an informed decision.
Dave Evans
