And it begins.... big pharma is here for COVID.

Dulanic

Diamond Member
Oct 27, 2000
9,968
592
136
Sure didn't take long.... something that has a 30% change of "maybe" helping shorten the virus a little, but no known impact on mortality, $3100 please. This is after the $70 million + we gave drug maker to help. But they aren't looking to profit off COVID right? So how much do you think they'll ask for a vaccine?


I merged the 2 threads about remdesivir pricing.
admin allisolm
 
Last edited by a moderator:

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,749
20,323
146
Haha, even at the $600 for low income peeps, ain't good enough. We're so fuct lol
 
Nov 8, 2012
20,842
4,785
146
Haha, even at the $600 for low income peeps, ain't good enough. We're so fuct lol

That is rather funny. You're talking folks who can't support $100 grocery bills let alone $600 for a vaccine.... Which this isn't even a vaccine - just a treatment if you do get the virus.
 

balloonshark

Diamond Member
Jun 5, 2008
7,131
3,613
136
As if we needed another reason to wear a mask...

If you don't wear a mask then be prepared to pay the stupid tax. :p
 

pauldun170

Diamond Member
Sep 26, 2011
9,488
5,698
136
Thanks to Republicans maintaining a system of American Bald Eagle Freedom lovin privatized health

Gilead Sciences Inc on Monday priced its COVID-19 antiviral remdesivir at $2,340 per patient for wealthier nations and agreed to send nearly all of its supply of the drug to the United States over the next three months.

The price tag is slightly below the range of $2,520 to $2,800 suggested last week by U.S. drug pricing research group the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) after British researchers said they found that the cheap, widely available steroid dexamethasone significantly reduced mortality among severely ill COVID-19 patients.



 
  • Love
Reactions: DarthKyrie

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,294
32,794
136
One more COVID-19 disadvantage for black people who are dying at a 3.5x greater rate then whites.
 

fleshconsumed

Diamond Member
Feb 21, 2002
6,486
2,363
136
There are currently 2.5 million active coronavirus cases in the US, and there will be many more than that. Let's say they can manufacture and sell 1,000,000 treatments, that's 2 Billion dollars right there. Any wonder why our healthcare costs so much?
 
Last edited:
Dec 10, 2005
28,653
13,783
136
There are currently 2.5 million active coronavirus cases in the US, and there will be many more than that. Let's say they can manufacture and sell 1,000,000 treatments, that's 2 trillion dollars right there. Any wonder why our healthcare costs so much?
This will likely only go to people who need hospitalization, since at the moment, it is administered by infusion. So the real comparison to make is how much will we save in overall hospitalization costs by shortening people's need to stay there with this drug compared to a normal hospitalization.
 

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
26,160
15,583
136
For someone who cant afford healthcare and otherwise disenfranchised, why dont you move to Europe? You will only have to work one job too, 8 hours, weekends off, free healthcare and 6 weeks "paid" vacation/year. Come get some :).
 

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
15,782
8,358
136
Hey, where's that ultimate capitalist Shkreli guy? Gilead could get some really good advice from him on how to control the market on essential life saving medicines/medical procedures.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie
Feb 4, 2009
35,862
17,403
136
There are currently 2.5 million active coronavirus cases in the US, and there will be many more than that. Let's say they can manufacture and sell 1,000,000 treatments, that's 2 trillion dollars right there. Any wonder why our healthcare costs so much?

Coming here to state this exact thing but billion.
 

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,749
20,323
146
That is rather funny. You're talking folks who can't support $100 grocery bills let alone $600 for a vaccine.... Which this isn't even a vaccine - just a treatment if you do get the virus.

Yea, pretty strong disconnect between the haves and the have-nots.
 

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
15,782
8,358
136
Goes hand in hand with keeping the cost of medical care high in order to justify the high cost of it all. Round-n-round we go.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

Dulanic

Diamond Member
Oct 27, 2000
9,968
592
136
Considering the cost of hospitalization, it seems like a heck of a bargain if it helps get people out of the hospital faster and avoid the ventilator.

Considering this has no known impact on fatality, I wouldn't say for sure it even does that. Nor do I know that is a valid reasoning. That's like similar to saying a hospital saved your life, how much is that worth? A million? So charge that!
 
Last edited:
Dec 10, 2005
28,653
13,783
136
Considering this has no known impact on fatality, I wouldn't say for sure it even does that. Nor do I know that is a valid reasoning. That's like similar to saying a hospital saved your life, how much is that worth? A million? So charge that!
In the preliminary trial report in NEJM, remdesivir reduced median time to recovery by about 4 days and reduced the risk of death by 30%. Do you think 4 hospital days are cheap? This drug is a fucking bargain compared to only supportive care.
 
  • Like
Reactions: uclaLabrat

Dulanic

Diamond Member
Oct 27, 2000
9,968
592
136
In the preliminary trial report in NEJM, remdesivir reduced median time to recovery by about 4 days and reduced the risk of death by 30%. Do you think 4 hospital days are cheap? This drug is a fucking bargain compared to only supportive care.
4 day reduction doesn't necessarily correlate to 4 hospital days. It may be but maybe it's 100% 6 day reduction for mild cases and 0 day for severe. I don't know. Either way I think it's a damn scam to charge this much when you got federal funding too. They were swearing how they weren't looking to profit on COVID, but they're full of shit.

Especially a rip off when the steroid treatments seem to do well if not better and reduced mortality rates.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FaaR and DarthKyrie

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,607
46,271
136
4 day reduction doesn't necessarily correlate to 4 hospital days. It may be but maybe it's 100% 6 day reduction for mild cases and 0 day for severe. I don't know. Either way I think it's a damn scam to charge this much when you got federal funding too. They were swearing how they weren't looking to profit on COVID, but they're full of shit.

Especially a rip off when the steroid treatments seem to do well if not better and reduced mortality rates.

Different stages of illness require different treatments. Dexamethasone was detrimental to patients taking it too early before the inflammation response that's actually killing people gets roaring. Remdesivir and convalescent plasma need to be given early as possible to halt progression and improve recovery time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brainonska511
Dec 10, 2005
28,653
13,783
136
Especially a rip off when the steroid treatments seem to do well if not better and reduced mortality rates
It is inappropriate to compare efficacy data across clinical trials - too many confounding variables.
4 day reduction doesn't necessarily correlate to 4 hospital days. It may be but maybe it's 100% 6 day reduction for mild cases and 0 day for severe. I don't know. Either way I think it's a damn scam to charge this much when you got federal funding too. They were swearing how they weren't looking to profit on COVID, but they're full of shit.
I think they could have charged a whole lot more for this drug based on what other respiratory illnesses cost to treat in hospitals.