• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

norseamd

Lifer
giphy.gif


IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that to assure compliance with the Court’s order, the Court directs service of this Order upon the United States Marshal for the Eastern District of New York, and further directs the United States Marshal Service to take those actions deemed necessary to enforce the provisions and prohibitions set forth in this Order.

https://professional-troublemaker.c...s-to-prevent-trump-from-enforcing-muslim-ban/

https://tsaoutofourpants.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/darweesh-v-dhs-tro.pdf
 
That troublemaker site is pretty good (assuming its accurate) at explaining some of our laws and rights.

I remember this guy from the body scanner hoo-ha, he has an interesting legal take on things.
 
I would be more likely to believe this if it came from CNN or WaPo, the leaders in fake news.
Trump wouldn't have to complain about the media if he had any actual leadership ability. But because he refuses to speak to the majority of Americans, the media does.
 
Trump wouldn't have to complain about the media if he had any actual leadership ability. But because he refuses to speak to the majority of Americans, the media does.

Actually, he speaks directly to Americans through Twitter and YouTube, bypassing those that twist his words and spread fake news.

For the record, this order is meaningless now. It targeted those already on their way to the US before the ban was issued. Those people ultimately were not deported. Anyone coming here from those countries now will be deported. There is nothing stopping that.

A federal judge in New York blocked part of President Donald Trump's controversial executive order on immigration Saturday, ruling that authorities could not remove individuals from seven Muslim-majority countries who had arrived in US airports after the order had been issued.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/28/polit...after-being-detained-in-ny-due-to-travel-ban/
 
Actually, he speaks directly to Americans through Twitter and YouTube, bypassing those that twist his words and spread fake news.

For the record, this order is meaningless now. It targeted those already on their way to the US before the ban was issued. Those people ultimately were not deported. Anyone coming here from those countries now will be deported. There is nothing stopping that.



http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/28/polit...after-being-detained-in-ny-due-to-travel-ban/
Oh noes, does the media twist the words of your Orange Messiah? Poor baby.

Sorry, buddy, but Trump isn't taking away our freedom of the media, regardless of how much it hurts your feelings.
 
Actually, he speaks directly to Americans through Twitter and YouTube, bypassing those that twist his words and spread fake news.

For the record, this order is meaningless now. It targeted those already on their way to the US before the ban was issued. Those people ultimately were not deported. Anyone coming here from those countries now will be deported. There is nothing stopping that.



http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/28/polit...after-being-detained-in-ny-due-to-travel-ban/

I think you need Introduction to English classes.
 
Actually, he speaks directly to Americans through Twitter and YouTube, bypassing those that twist his words and spread fake news.

For the record, this order is meaningless now. It targeted those already on their way to the US before the ban was issued. Those people ultimately were not deported. Anyone coming here from those countries now will be deported. There is nothing stopping that.



http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/28/polit...after-being-detained-in-ny-due-to-travel-ban/

the media doesn't twist his words. They repeat what he has said.

I think you are about to realize that he says some pretty ridiculous things.
 
Oh noes, does the media twist the words of your Orange Messiah? Poor baby.

Sorry, buddy, but Trump isn't taking away our freedom of the media, regardless of how much it hurts your feelings.

the Media should not twist the words of any president but they do.

how is he taking freedom of the press away?

sounds like your feeling are hurt. need a tissue?
 
Dude, you post fake news sites right, far-right and alt-right. You've the intellectual competence of a hamster raised solely on processed corn kernels.

If we raised a hamster solely on processed corn kernels, do you think he would be having the same basic logic fail as AnonymouseUser?
 
Trump wouldn't have to complain about the media if he had any actual leadership ability. But because he refuses to speak to the majority of Americans, the media does.

What? Obama was not at fault for Fox news and their shit though. Your statement is dumb. Trump might not have leadership skills, but that has nothing to do with what the media decides to do. What an dumb thing to say.
 
What? Obama was not at fault for Fox news and their shit though. Your statement is dumb. Trump might not have leadership skills, but that has nothing to do with what the media decides to do. What an dumb thing to say.
If Trump was speaking to the majority of Americans, the media would likely be on his side.
What the media does isn't a conspiracy. Their job is to sell copy, and they do that by giving their readers the news that they want to see. If that news is critical of the President (any President), that is because the President isn't speaking to those people. BTW, I was frequently critical of Obama for not speaking to the Fox news crowd.
 
If Trump was speaking to the majority of Americans, the media would likely be on his side.
What the media does isn't a conspiracy. Their job is to sell copy, and they do that by giving their readers the news that they want to see. If that news is critical of the President (any President), that is because the President isn't speaking to those people. BTW, I was frequently critical of Obama for not speaking to the Fox news crowd.

The fuck you on? As you pointed out, the Media is trying to sell to the people, the majority of which did not vote for him. No way in hell would he have the majority of the media on his side when the majority of people are not. This is not about bias either. The media has a self interest to give the people that watch what they way, and out side of fox that is anti Trump. Just like when Obama was in office, Fox was anti Obama.
 
Mr Trump interviewed with the media last week and had the opportunity to speak to the people. He was questioned about this very issue, and he made the decision to blow it off. "I have a big heart.. a really big heart" is what he said. And 2 days later, we saw just how big his heart really is.
 
If we raised a hamster solely on processed corn kernels, do you think he would be having the same basic logic fail as AnonymouseUser?

Is AnonymouseUser prone to cannabilism?

https://phys.org/news/2017-01-corn-french-hamsters-deranged-cannibals.html



OK, I have to say that the ~dozen times this study was posted in the pop media last week, it is completely sensational. Any rodent would eat their young if they judge that resources aren't optimal for bringing them to maturity (poor nutrition the number one culprit). Biology is a resource-intensive game, and giving birth is the biggest resource sink there is. rodents are pretty good at harvesting those potentially lost resources if they see lean times ahead, to prepare for a more favorable feeding period.
 
The fuck you on? As you pointed out, the Media is trying to sell to the people, the majority of which did not vote for him. No way in hell would he have the majority of the media on his side when the majority of people are not. This is not about bias either. The media has a self interest to give the people that watch what they way, and out side of fox that is anti Trump. Just like when Obama was in office, Fox was anti Obama.
I am supremely confident that if Trump had decided to appeal to the majority of the voters, instead of just continuing to pander to his base, that the media would have found their way to his side.
 
I am supremely confident that if Trump had decided to appeal to the majority of the voters, instead of just continuing to pander to his base, that the media would have found their way to his side.

Super dumb. No way in hell they would be on his side after the election. Again, the Media has a self interest and the majority of Americans did not vote for him. I am not sure what you had wanted to say, but you did not say it I'm sure. There is no way this many people could hate him, and he win over the Media. No way Fox news gets cozy with Obama for that same reason.
 
Super dumb. No way in hell they would be on his side after the election. Again, the Media has a self interest and the majority of Americans did not vote for him. I am not sure what you had wanted to say, but you did not say it I'm sure. There is no way this many people could hate him, and he win over the Media. No way Fox news gets cozy with Obama for that same reason.

I guess I'm saying that he could have at least tried to be a leader for the majority of Americans. But he didn't. Not even in the slightest.
 
Super dumb. No way in hell they would be on his side after the election. Again, the Media has a self interest and the majority of Americans did not vote for him. I am not sure what you had wanted to say, but you did not say it I'm sure. There is no way this many people could hate him, and he win over the Media. No way Fox news gets cozy with Obama for that same reason.
It seems pretty plain to me that he was saying that if Trump had opted to aim for unity, and was trying to reconcile with people that didn't support him, the media would be supportive of him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vic
It seems pretty plain to me that he was saying that if Trump had opted to aim for unity, and was trying to reconcile with people that didn't support him, the media would be supportive of him.

No. You cannot run as hyperbolic of a campaign as he did and then turn around and get the Media back. Once he one the election the way he did, it was over. If the people liked him, the Media would like him because it would make them money. People cant like him because of what he represents.
 
I guess I'm saying that he could have at least tried to be a leader for the majority of Americans. But he didn't. Not even in the slightest.

Should have, sure. Could have, never. Saying he could have won over the Media by being a leader is wrong. The positions are mutually exclusive.
 
Back
Top