anandtech Prescott review NOW UP! (anand inside)

jdogg707

Diamond Member
Jun 24, 2002
6,098
0
76
looks like a great overclocking chip. Anyone know where to find one now? I know the article said March 1st, hopefully someone will get them out before then.
 

Alkaline5

Senior member
Jun 21, 2001
801
0
0
There's certainly not much to get excited about either way with this launch. For the time being, a Pentium 4 is a Pentium 4, I guess.
 

jdogg707

Diamond Member
Jun 24, 2002
6,098
0
76
Spartan Technologies has them, seem to have a fai, but not great Reseller Rating of 7.02 Lifetime. I don't know whether to ditch my Athlon 64 3200+ / MSI K8T Ne-FISR2 combo for a Pentium 4 Prescott 3.0GHZ / Abit IC7-Max3 combo...decisions...haha
 

Adul

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
32,999
44
91
danny.tangtam.com
Originally posted by: jdogg707
Spartan Technologies has them, seem to have a fai, but not great Reseller Rating of 7.02 Lifetime. I don't know whether to ditch my Athlon 64 3200+ / MSI K8T Ne-FISR2 combo for a Pentium 4 Prescott 3.0GHZ / Abit IC7-Max3 combo...decisions...haha

I think you'd be nuts to do it.
 

Schadenfroh

Elite Member
Mar 8, 2003
38,416
4
0
Originally posted by: Adul
Originally posted by: jdogg707
Spartan Technologies has them, seem to have a fai, but not great Reseller Rating of 7.02 Lifetime. I don't know whether to ditch my Athlon 64 3200+ / MSI K8T Ne-FISR2 combo for a Pentium 4 Prescott 3.0GHZ / Abit IC7-Max3 combo...decisions...haha

I think you'd be nuts to do it.

please do not enter anandtech without your sarcasm detector
 

andreasl

Senior member
Aug 25, 2000
419
0
0
Intel should have had a backup plan with a Northwood/1MB on the 90nm node. Or perhaps do a 3 level cache design. 8/256/1M or something. It would have been smaller, cooler and faster (at least for now)
 

Ionizer86

Diamond Member
Jun 20, 2001
5,292
0
76
I thought Intel announced plans to have the EE flagship larger cache P4's while mainstream P4C's would move to 1MB L2. That's what I read somewhere. It'd look like this:
P4EE: 8/256/1024
New P4C: 8/1024
 

jdogg707

Diamond Member
Jun 24, 2002
6,098
0
76
Originally posted by: Adul
Originally posted by: jdogg707
Spartan Technologies has them, seem to have a fai, but not great Reseller Rating of 7.02 Lifetime. I don't know whether to ditch my Athlon 64 3200+ / MSI K8T Ne-FISR2 combo for a Pentium 4 Prescott 3.0GHZ / Abit IC7-Max3 combo...decisions...haha

I think you'd be nuts to do it.

Yes, sarcasm is a beautiful thing...especially at Anandtech...
 

Macro2

Diamond Member
May 20, 2000
4,874
0
0
From Anand, I gotta laugh.

REF:"SYSMark was one of the only applications to show a positive performance improvement for Prescott.


NO KIDDING! I thought every test site had Bapco located at the same address as Intel.



RE:"and we see that with clock speed that advantage continues to grow over Northwood. Keep on reading, it gets even more interesting..."

When they get it over 3.2 GHZ it MIGHT MAKE A DIFFERENCE.

----------------------

Looks like Prescot is a step backward for now. No wonder Intel had to come out with the P4 Extremely expensive edition.
 

ViRGE

Elite Member, Moderator Emeritus
Oct 9, 1999
31,516
167
106
Humm, interesting; Anand doesn't expect the Prescotts to become widely availible in the retail channel(i.e. Newegg) for another month.:Q :(
 

andreasl

Senior member
Aug 25, 2000
419
0
0
Originally posted by: Macro2
From Anand, I gotta laugh.

REF:"SYSMark was one of the only applications to show a positive performance improvement for Prescott.


NO KIDDING! I thought every test site had Bapco located at the same address as Intel.



RE:"and we see that with clock speed that advantage continues to grow over Northwood. Keep on reading, it gets even more interesting..."

When they get it over 3.2 GHZ it MIGHT MAKE A DIFFERENCE.

Anand failed to mention that this improvement in performance scaling is primarily from the increased L2 cache. In fact all other improvements in the core probably just turns up as noise in the scaling benchmarks compared with the bigger L2 cache. A Northwood with 1MB L2 would blow away Prescott completely. Just see what the P4EE does (although it has 2MB L3 instead)
 

Macro2

Diamond Member
May 20, 2000
4,874
0
0
Whens the 3.6 coming out? After the 3.4 in a month or more I presume. Only then will we see the power of the Prescott, hoe yeah!


Did you see anything about 64 bit capabilities?
 

Macro2

Diamond Member
May 20, 2000
4,874
0
0
Anand didn't seem too thrilled. Saying we had to wait for 3.6 GHZ is basically a bad conclusion of Prescott at this time.

 

GTaudiophile

Lifer
Oct 24, 2000
29,767
33
81
One word: Meh.

I'll continue to be patient until 12/04 or 01/05 when it's time to do a major upgrade.
 

Budman

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
10,980
0
0
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
One word: Meh.

I'll continue to be patient until 12/04 or 01/05 when it's time to do a major upgrade.

yes I agree,I will not upgrade until I can be sure to have at least 5ghz.

2.4c @ 3.2ghz is fast enough for me,for now ;)
 

Pandaren

Golden Member
Sep 13, 2003
1,029
0
0
Performance is pretty mediocre. I've looked at the AnandTech benches as well as the benches from Tom's and Xbitlabs.

Clock for clock performance seems roughly equivalent. Prescott's technological tricks mainly keep the IPC from taking a big hit from the 31-stage pipeline.

OEMs will like the chip because they won't have to pay extra $ for it. I think Intel knows enthusiasts won't be happy with the numbers, and this is why it will take time for the CPU to ship in volume to resellers.
 

Acanthus

Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
19,915
2
76
ostif.org
Originally posted by: Pandaren
Performance is pretty mediocre. I've looked at the AnandTech benches as well as the benches from Tom's and Xbitlabs.

Clock for clock performance seems roughly equivalent. Prescott's technological tricks mainly keep the IPC from taking a big hit from the 31-stage pipeline.

OEMs will like the chip because they won't have to pay extra $ for it. I think Intel knows enthusiasts won't be happy with the numbers, and this is why it will take time for the CPU to ship in volume to resellers.

It is EXTREMELY impressive to increase the pipeline 55% and keep performance the same. I'm going to wait for the chip to get ironed out then get a good step 3.2ghz to run at 4.0ghz on default voltage :D just like i did with northwoods.
 

Acanthus

Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
19,915
2
76
ostif.org
Anyone else think it was weird that the P4-EE dominated the benchmarks today? It was a draw between A-64 and P4EE last i knew.
 

zephyrprime

Diamond Member
Feb 18, 2001
7,512
2
81
Now our 10 stage CPU can run at 2GHz, but at 2GHz we?ll have the exact same performance as the first CPU at 1GHz. Remember that although we?re running twice as fast, we have twice as many stages to make it through so the overall throughput is the same as the first 1GHz design.
Wait a second. I think this is wrong. The 10 stage pipeline cpu will have higher throughout. Can anyone clarify this?

being the intelligent CPU designers that we are, we would only extend the pipeline to 10 stages if we knew that we could make each clock period shorter than 0.5ns. And let?s say we do accomplish that, that we can get the clock period down to 0.33ns. Now design 2 can reach 3GHz, while design 1 can only reach 1GHz.
I think this is also wrong. Doesn't an increase in pipeline length by a factor N result in a less than factor N increase in clockspeed because there's a certain amount of additional circuitry needed to interface adjacent pipeline stages?