- Mar 8, 2003
- 38,416
- 4
- 0
Originally posted by: jdogg707
Spartan Technologies has them, seem to have a fai, but not great Reseller Rating of 7.02 Lifetime. I don't know whether to ditch my Athlon 64 3200+ / MSI K8T Ne-FISR2 combo for a Pentium 4 Prescott 3.0GHZ / Abit IC7-Max3 combo...decisions...haha
Originally posted by: Adul
Originally posted by: jdogg707
Spartan Technologies has them, seem to have a fai, but not great Reseller Rating of 7.02 Lifetime. I don't know whether to ditch my Athlon 64 3200+ / MSI K8T Ne-FISR2 combo for a Pentium 4 Prescott 3.0GHZ / Abit IC7-Max3 combo...decisions...haha
I think you'd be nuts to do it.
Originally posted by: Adul
Originally posted by: jdogg707
Spartan Technologies has them, seem to have a fai, but not great Reseller Rating of 7.02 Lifetime. I don't know whether to ditch my Athlon 64 3200+ / MSI K8T Ne-FISR2 combo for a Pentium 4 Prescott 3.0GHZ / Abit IC7-Max3 combo...decisions...haha
I think you'd be nuts to do it.
Originally posted by: Macro2
From Anand, I gotta laugh.
REF:"SYSMark was one of the only applications to show a positive performance improvement for Prescott.
NO KIDDING! I thought every test site had Bapco located at the same address as Intel.
RE:"and we see that with clock speed that advantage continues to grow over Northwood. Keep on reading, it gets even more interesting..."
When they get it over 3.2 GHZ it MIGHT MAKE A DIFFERENCE.
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
One word: Meh.
I'll continue to be patient until 12/04 or 01/05 when it's time to do a major upgrade.
Originally posted by: Pandaren
Performance is pretty mediocre. I've looked at the AnandTech benches as well as the benches from Tom's and Xbitlabs.
Clock for clock performance seems roughly equivalent. Prescott's technological tricks mainly keep the IPC from taking a big hit from the 31-stage pipeline.
OEMs will like the chip because they won't have to pay extra $ for it. I think Intel knows enthusiasts won't be happy with the numbers, and this is why it will take time for the CPU to ship in volume to resellers.
Wait a second. I think this is wrong. The 10 stage pipeline cpu will have higher throughout. Can anyone clarify this?Now our 10 stage CPU can run at 2GHz, but at 2GHz we?ll have the exact same performance as the first CPU at 1GHz. Remember that although we?re running twice as fast, we have twice as many stages to make it through so the overall throughput is the same as the first 1GHz design.
I think this is also wrong. Doesn't an increase in pipeline length by a factor N result in a less than factor N increase in clockspeed because there's a certain amount of additional circuitry needed to interface adjacent pipeline stages?being the intelligent CPU designers that we are, we would only extend the pipeline to 10 stages if we knew that we could make each clock period shorter than 0.5ns. And let?s say we do accomplish that, that we can get the clock period down to 0.33ns. Now design 2 can reach 3GHz, while design 1 can only reach 1GHz.