- Oct 21, 2006
- 5,401
- 2
- 0
I don't get it. I see them in a number of "up-scale" (or wannabe up-scale) modern cars. They don't seem practical, and they don't seem to add anything to the bling factor, IMO.
What gives?
What gives?
Had one in my G35. I liked it.
Why do people have analog watches or wind up watches when digital ones have more functions and are more accurate?
Analog watches look more sophisticated and professional than a digital watch. Partly because you can do things with an analog face of a watch to add luxury/expense that you can't do with a digital. An expensive watch is a status symbol first, and a time telling piece second if at all.
In a car, the only reason to have a clock is so that you can tell time. Anything that increases the amount of time it takes me to figure out the time (ie. an analog face) is dumb. Taking a second or two to look at your watch sitting at your desk or walking in a store is not a problem, taking your eyes off the road for 2 seconds while doing 75MPH (220 ft) down the highway during rush hour could have catastrophic consequences.
Anything that increases the amount of time it takes me to figure out the time (ie. an analog face) is dumb.
If you can't read an analogue clock with a near-instant glance, perhaps you should revisit that week of elementary school.
Seriously though, it doesn't take any longer to read an analogue clock than it does to read a digital one.
ZV
It is inarguably easier to read a small LCD number than it is to read a small analog clock regardless of your educational level.
![]()
I was able to read that the clock read almost 6:30 before the picture even finished loading (on a 7 megabit connection). I can't imagine digital being any faster.
Seriously, it's much faster for me to glance at an analogue clock and get a +/- 5 minute time than it is to scan a digital clock. If it takes a person any appreciable amount of effort to scan an analogue clock, there's something wrong.
ZV
I can't understand why it takes up so much space on the (MY06 MB E350 4Matic) dash and yet the LCD display in the centre console does not have a clock.
Also hate the puny little analogue clock that was in the early Fusions
I was able to read that the clock read almost 6:30 before the picture even finished loading (on a 7 megabit connection). I can't imagine digital being any faster.
Seriously, it's much faster for me to glance at an analogue clock and get a +/- 5 minute time than it is to scan a digital clock. If it takes a person any appreciable amount of effort to scan an analogue clock, there's something wrong.
ZV
I wish my Jeep had ANY clock. Thanks, Chrysler beancounters