• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

An extremely disturbing letter to Bush about Enron from Michael Moore

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.


<< Could only read like the first page..He is just a bitter evil man that makes money by selling hate..

He is the Anti-Limbaugh >>




That would make Rush a sweet good man that makes money by selling love......bahahahhaa 😀
 
Great read. Michael Moore has hit the nail on the head with this one. I'd love to see the look on dubya's face as he reads it.
 


<<

<< Could only read like the first page..He is just a bitter evil man that makes money by selling hate..

He is the Anti-Limbaugh >>




That would make Rush a sweet good man that makes money by selling love......bahahahhaa 😀 >>



At least I can bear to listen to him without getting nauseous..

Guess it would have been better to say Moore and Limbaugh are polar opposites, Limbaugh is to liberal wackos as Moore is to conservative republicans
 
Republicans AND Democrats are both equally dirty and deceitful. No one party is "better" than the other in this respect and it just like trying to pick the lesser of two evils.

Although (given the slant of this message board), I'm fairly certain that if this letter had been about Clinton while he was in office, many more of you would accept it as fact w/o even considering the source...
 
make that



<< Limbaugh is to liberal wackos as Moore is to conservative republicans wackos >>

 
This who Enron thing is so stupid.

1. Its the Dems revenge for the Clinton Impeacement
2. Most of Enron's questional activities happened during the Clinton Administration
3. Money has gone to BOTH Dems and Republicans.
 
Man oh man, the passion and richeous indignation this guy's got. If he could just work in a sexual angle, he'd make a great Republican.
 


<< Why has everyone forgotten that Lay was Clinton's golfing buddy when he (Clinton) was in office? >>

Well many here think Clinton is scum.. Does that mean george W. is scum too? I don't know as I am one of those very cynicaol American voters and I'm not surprised nor that dismayed. I kind of figure they (the politicians) are all like that. I bet if Gore was President you'd find an awful lot of skeletons in his closet too.

To me the biggest negative about Bush is his Barber. He always looks fuzzy Headed. The leader of the Free World should at least have a good haircut. Anybody else notice how fuzzy his haircut looks? Hey G.W. get the Mousse and get with the program!
 
LOL Michael Moore.

Where was he when the Clinton boys lost one BILLION dollars in federal School Money?

Where was he when Democrats accepted money from Enron?

Where was he when a Democrat personally Lobbied for Enron to the white house?

This guy can't get any more partisan if he tried.

And his stupidity factor was off the scale when he said on "Politically Incorrect" that we had "plenty of room" for all illegal aliens.

This guy had one great moment making Roger and Me. Its been downhill every since.


And I read the trash he wrote.

Lets examine a few things.

#1. No proof whatsoever to back up a word he says.

#2. No a peep of mention about the Demcorats who took Enron money even though he had no trouble goign after mujltiple republicans.


How about some quotes? heck, you got mother-in-law problems! Now, I have a very good relationship with my mother-in-law, but then, I never told her to put $8,000 of her money into a company my administration knew was going belly-up.

He knew? And the proof is... Oh thats right. No proof LOL

You just couldn't stay away from your old cowpoke friend from Texas

Old Cowpoke? Where does this moron get his hatred from?

I mean, you loved this man so intensely that, when you were awarded a set of keys the Supreme Court had made for you so you could live in the White House, you invited Kenny Boy to set up shop -- at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue! He interviewed those who would hold high-level Energy Department positions in your administration.

I didn't know meeting with the white house (as MANY groups do) is "setting up shop"

I mean, you loved this man so intensely that, when you were awarded a set of keys the Supreme Court had made for you so you could live in the White House, you invited Kenny Boy to set up shop -- at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue! He interviewed those who would hold high-level Energy Department positions in your administration.

And more belitteling bias for the Demcrat's role in Enron. What a shocker.

And I'm only skimming.

This moron's ability to be as bias as possible to one political party and pretend to be the champion of the common man is sickening.


 
"I don't know who's dumber: Michael Moore or the people that take him seriously."

I don't know either. What I do know is that you are taking him very seriously. 😀
 


<< How surprising that Texmaster has resorted to name calling. Odd. >>




And how surprising it is for you come in this thread not to debate but to flame 😀
 


<< To me the biggest negative about Bush is his Barber. He always looks fuzzy Headed. The leader of the Free World should at least have a good haircut. Anybody else notice how fuzzy his haircut looks? Hey G.W. get the Mousse and get with the program!

>>




That isn't his hair... thats his aura you're seeing 😀



 
GREAT READ: I have a new god to worship for the month of February
MICHAEL MOORE IS THE MAN
Very inciteful and wicked cutting wit.
God the truth hurts eh, gw lovers?




mithrandir2001 You are a punk who couldn't even take the time to read it.


Vespasian:<<I don't know. Michael Moore has always been very, very far to the left.>>
so what ...... Does that mean he can't speak the truth?

ShotgunSteve: <<If you are going to repost garbage, at least repost GOOD garbage.>>
I've always been curious after reading your posts if your IQ is above 50
I know from know on when ever I see any of your posts I'll skip to the next one :disgust:

Tripleshot: Good post, nice to complement someone who bothered to read the post

brjames: <<Michael Moore is an idiot. >>
If you had added on half the brains Michael has you'd still be a retard :disgust:

AmusedOne: As usual you're spouting meaningless pathetic crap.
You really are a pathetic worthless POS punk :disgust:




Have a nice day 😀
 
Texmaster: I am going out on a limb and assume that you actually didn't read the letter from Michael Moore's web site and just read the repost of the letter. There you would have found that a lot of the words are actually hyperlinks to real news articles. Anyone who watches the news would know about Bush's mother-in-law losing $8,000 in Enron. He is the link of one of the articles : My Poor Mother-In-Law .

I personally take what most politicians say with a grain of salt. Of course I have to hate people from Texas because I was born in Oklahoma. I think it's some kind of birth right or something.

Here is the link to the letter: Letter
 
For all you saying, "why is he not mentioning clinton or the dems", perhaps I misread it... but he did mention the democrats (not clinton directly). Go read it again if you missed this, chances are you probably read halfway and decided to hit reply.

I think the biggest point in his rant was that he was saying lets get rid of private funding for presidents. It is obvious they can be bought far too easily. I havn't seen anyone else mention this, did I read into it wrong?

Everytime someone posts one of these articles, 75% of people have to come in here and write it off as propaganda, most likely without even reading it. How does that help stir any thought or discussion? You can go around labeling anything you want as propaganda, but that doesn't really conclude anything.
 


<< Texmaster: I am going out on a limb and assume that you actually didn't read the letter from Michael Moore's web site and just read the repost of the letter. There you would have found that a lot of the words are actually hyperlinks to real news articles. Anyone who watches the news would know about Bush's mother-in-law losing $8,000 in Enron. He is the link of one of the articles : My Poor Mother-In-Law .

I personally take what most politicians say with a grain of salt. Of course I have to hate people from Texas because I was born in Oklahoma. I think it some kind of birth right or something.

Here is the link to the letter: Letter >>



You are abolsutely right. I did not go to his site. And I was wrong he wasn't backing up his sources. The problem is he was only backing up the easy ones. And many of his links linked to politically biased articles like himself.

I mean please, the Villiage Voice? Founded by Norman Mailer?? LOL Please. You can't get more biased than that except at www.michaelmoore.com or www.dnc.com 🙂

In fact, there wasn't one link in there that didn't endorse Gore the last go aroud for president. 🙂 Not much of a shocker though.

He linked to that numberous times when he had a political axe to grind.

And what I really found interesting is that every quote I posted he did not have a link to. Interesting isn't it? 🙂
 
for all you great americans that are bashing clinton, what difference is it going to make, he's not the leader of the nation anymore, so anything he did doesn't matter anymore, but Bush is president, and a bad one

oh texmaster you want proof, well if you knew anything half of it is getting shredded for some odd reason, and then your pal cheney is refusing to give up documents, who knows why, you keep saying the dem accepted money from enron, did you see that thread here awhile ago showing the money donated to republicans and dem from enron, what was the breakdown 70/30, i wonder who they were trying to favor

and what does moore have to proove, do you thinks he just made up all the gov't jobs he gave to all his enron and oil buddies, that really wouldn't be to hard to disprove, so since you're screaming for proof why don't you proove what he's saying is wrong instead of making an a$$ out of yourself
 


<< I think the biggest point in his rant was that he was saying lets get rid of private funding for presidents. It is obvious they can be bought far too easily. I havn't seen anyone else mention this, did I read into it wrong? >>


well, then why didn't he just talk about campaign reform instead of his sarcastic spew about bush and the repubs; notice how he oh, so gently talks about the dems saying "well, they may have taken money but it really wasn't so much compared to the big bad repubs". he's a clown.
 
"and what does moore have to proove"

That there is such a thing as guilt by association.

I've yet to see anything that suggests any wrongdoing by the administration. No doubt Moore didn't see this either, that's why he has to try to use innuendo and guilt by association to further his own agenda.

Enron was/is a huge company based in Texas, no doubt they would have strong connections with any texan politician. What is yet to be proved, and imho will never be proved because it's not true, is that Bush is somehow culpable for the Enron collapse because of these connections.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top