• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

An Armed Citizen With A Permit Stopped The Last VA College Shooting Rampage

lack of gun control let the rampage happen in the first place. i dont think this, but i think the arguement is retarded
 
Originally posted by: fisheerman
spurred by another topic:

I haven't seen the mainstream media presenting this in the whole gun control arguement have you?

article

By two people with guns actually. What no one on the "yeah gotta have my 6 shooter with me at all times crowd" mentions is that ONE OF THEM WAS A OFF DUTY OR FORMER LEO, different sources say differently! So one would expect that he took control of the situation and once the murderer was subdued made sure that all weapons where out of reach of the murder and the people who subdued him, in plain site, and as soon as the police arrived in loud contact with the police who where coming on the scene.

Now how many of the yahoo gotta carry at all times crowd would know or have the ability in a stress situation to handle themselves correctly? 1 in 20 if that!
 
Originally posted by: PELarson
Originally posted by: fisheerman
spurred by another topic:

I haven't seen the mainstream media presenting this in the whole gun control arguement have you?

article

By two people with guns actually. What no one on the "yeah gotta have my 6 shooter with me at all times crowd" mentions is that ONE OF THEM WAS A OFF DUTY OR FORMER LEO, different sources say differently! So one would expect that he took control of the situation and once the murderer was subdued made sure that all weapons where out of reach of the murder and the people who subdued him, in plain site, and as soon as the police arrived in loud contact with the police who where coming on the scene.

Now how many of the yahoo gotta carry at all times crowd would know or have the ability in a stress situation to handle themselves correctly? 1 in 20 if that!

Add to that you're running around with a gun trying to become a hero, and another hero with his gun sees you running around with a gun and pops one off at you. Or the police sniper takes you out not knowing whether you're the real shooter or not, or just a wanna-be hero.
 
Originally posted by: Looney
Originally posted by: PELarson
Originally posted by: fisheerman
spurred by another topic:

I haven't seen the mainstream media presenting this in the whole gun control arguement have you?

article

By two people with guns actually. What no one on the "yeah gotta have my 6 shooter with me at all times crowd" mentions is that ONE OF THEM WAS A OFF DUTY OR FORMER LEO, different sources say differently! So one would expect that he took control of the situation and once the murderer was subdued made sure that all weapons where out of reach of the murder and the people who subdued him, in plain site, and as soon as the police arrived in loud contact with the police who where coming on the scene.

Now how many of the yahoo gotta carry at all times crowd would know or have the ability in a stress situation to handle themselves correctly? 1 in 20 if that!

Add to that you're running around with a gun trying to become a hero, and another hero with his gun sees you running around with a gun and pops one off at you. Or the police sniper takes you out not knowing whether you're the real shooter or not, or just a wanna-be hero.

Well, we have seen what happens when you two get your way (keeping eeeeevil guns out of the hands of law abiding citizens), and its much worse than what either of you THINK would have happened if someone else had a gun.
 
Originally posted by: JD50
Originally posted by: Looney
Originally posted by: PELarson
Originally posted by: fisheerman
spurred by another topic:

I haven't seen the mainstream media presenting this in the whole gun control arguement have you?

article

By two people with guns actually. What no one on the "yeah gotta have my 6 shooter with me at all times crowd" mentions is that ONE OF THEM WAS A OFF DUTY OR FORMER LEO, different sources say differently! So one would expect that he took control of the situation and once the murderer was subdued made sure that all weapons where out of reach of the murder and the people who subdued him, in plain site, and as soon as the police arrived in loud contact with the police who where coming on the scene.

Now how many of the yahoo gotta carry at all times crowd would know or have the ability in a stress situation to handle themselves correctly? 1 in 20 if that!

Add to that you're running around with a gun trying to become a hero, and another hero with his gun sees you running around with a gun and pops one off at you. Or the police sniper takes you out not knowing whether you're the real shooter or not, or just a wanna-be hero.

Well, we have seen what happens when you two get your way (keeping eeeeevil guns out of the hands of law abiding citizens), and its much worse than what either of you THINK would have happened if someone else had a gun.

If i had a gun it would be used for self-defense, not to be a hero. That incident was lucky that one of the 'heroes' was an actual cop... if you had run up with your gun and saw 2 guys pointing guns at one another, who would you shoot? both of them?
 
Originally posted by: Looney
Originally posted by: JD50
Originally posted by: Looney
Originally posted by: PELarson
Originally posted by: fisheerman
spurred by another topic:

I haven't seen the mainstream media presenting this in the whole gun control arguement have you?

article

By two people with guns actually. What no one on the "yeah gotta have my 6 shooter with me at all times crowd" mentions is that ONE OF THEM WAS A OFF DUTY OR FORMER LEO, different sources say differently! So one would expect that he took control of the situation and once the murderer was subdued made sure that all weapons where out of reach of the murder and the people who subdued him, in plain site, and as soon as the police arrived in loud contact with the police who where coming on the scene.

Now how many of the yahoo gotta carry at all times crowd would know or have the ability in a stress situation to handle themselves correctly? 1 in 20 if that!

Add to that you're running around with a gun trying to become a hero, and another hero with his gun sees you running around with a gun and pops one off at you. Or the police sniper takes you out not knowing whether you're the real shooter or not, or just a wanna-be hero.

Well, we have seen what happens when you two get your way (keeping eeeeevil guns out of the hands of law abiding citizens), and its much worse than what either of you THINK would have happened if someone else had a gun.

If i had a gun it would be used for self-defense, not to be a hero. That incident was lucky that one of the 'heroes' was an actual cop... if you had run up with your gun and saw 2 guys pointing guns at one another, who would you shoot? both of them?


If there is some loon running around shooting people wouldn't it be in your best interest to stop him? Sorry this isn't the movies, people don't get into a staring contest while pointing guns at each other, it doesn't happen that way.
 
BTW, I'm not sure how someone could live with themself if they saw all of this going down and they had the means to stop it. Could you?
 
Originally posted by: JD50
Originally posted by: Looney
Originally posted by: JD50
Originally posted by: Looney
Originally posted by: PELarson
Originally posted by: fisheerman
spurred by another topic:

I haven't seen the mainstream media presenting this in the whole gun control arguement have you?

article

By two people with guns actually. What no one on the "yeah gotta have my 6 shooter with me at all times crowd" mentions is that ONE OF THEM WAS A OFF DUTY OR FORMER LEO, different sources say differently! So one would expect that he took control of the situation and once the murderer was subdued made sure that all weapons where out of reach of the murder and the people who subdued him, in plain site, and as soon as the police arrived in loud contact with the police who where coming on the scene.

Now how many of the yahoo gotta carry at all times crowd would know or have the ability in a stress situation to handle themselves correctly? 1 in 20 if that!

Add to that you're running around with a gun trying to become a hero, and another hero with his gun sees you running around with a gun and pops one off at you. Or the police sniper takes you out not knowing whether you're the real shooter or not, or just a wanna-be hero.

Well, we have seen what happens when you two get your way (keeping eeeeevil guns out of the hands of law abiding citizens), and its much worse than what either of you THINK would have happened if someone else had a gun.

If i had a gun it would be used for self-defense, not to be a hero. That incident was lucky that one of the 'heroes' was an actual cop... if you had run up with your gun and saw 2 guys pointing guns at one another, who would you shoot? both of them?


If there is some loon running around shooting people wouldn't it be in your best interest to stop him? Sorry this isn't the movies, people don't get into a staring contest while pointing guns at each other, it doesn't happen that way.

And if somebody else has a gun and sees you running with one, what is going to stop him from assuming you're not the bad guy and popping one off at you?

YOU'RE the one that needs to wake up and realize this isn't the movies, and if you're running around trying to be a hero, other people with hero complexes are going to be as trigger happy as you, and seeing you running around with a gun, will probably gun you down... or you'll shoot the wrong person.
 
Originally posted by: JD50
BTW, I'm not sure how someone could live with themself if they saw all of this going down and they had the means to stop it. Could you?

I don't have a heroes complex, so i'll leave it up to the professionals to do the job. I wouldn't run to my car and grab a gun to run back and try to be the hero (which these 'citizens' had to do).
 
Originally posted by: Looney
YOU'RE the one that needs to wake up and realize this isn't the movies, and if you're running around trying to be a hero, other people with hero complexes are going to be as trigger happy as you, and seeing you running around with a gun, will probably gun you down... or you'll shoot the wrong person.

Nobody is going to shoot somebody else without making sure there is imminent danger to themselves or others.

Quite making stuff up and take a firearm class.
 
Originally posted by: JD50
Originally posted by: Looney
Originally posted by: PELarson
Originally posted by: fisheerman
spurred by another topic:

I haven't seen the mainstream media presenting this in the whole gun control arguement have you?

article

By two people with guns actually. What no one on the "yeah gotta have my 6 shooter with me at all times crowd" mentions is that ONE OF THEM WAS A OFF DUTY OR FORMER LEO, different sources say differently! So one would expect that he took control of the situation and once the murderer was subdued made sure that all weapons where out of reach of the murder and the people who subdued him, in plain site, and as soon as the police arrived in loud contact with the police who where coming on the scene.

Now how many of the yahoo gotta carry at all times crowd would know or have the ability in a stress situation to handle themselves correctly? 1 in 20 if that!

Add to that you're running around with a gun trying to become a hero, and another hero with his gun sees you running around with a gun and pops one off at you. Or the police sniper takes you out not knowing whether you're the real shooter or not, or just a wanna-be hero.

Well, we have seen what happens when you two get your way (keeping eeeeevil guns out of the hands of law abiding citizens), and its much worse than what either of you THINK would have happened if someone else had a gun.

Ahhh.. another MUST CARRY GUN, DON"T KNOW HOW TO USE GUN, MUST CARRY GUN! advocate.

Nowhere have I advocated banning guns. Now banning idiots that think(?) returning to the Wild West will make this country safer from carry permits and hand gun ownership might not be a bad idea.
 
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Looney
YOU'RE the one that needs to wake up and realize this isn't the movies, and if you're running around trying to be a hero, other people with hero complexes are going to be as trigger happy as you, and seeing you running around with a gun, will probably gun you down... or you'll shoot the wrong person.

Nobody is going to shoot somebody else without making sure there is imminent danger to themselves or others.

Quite making stuff up and take a firearm class.

How about quit being John Wayne and realize that this isn't the movies, and you running around with a gun will probably cause more panic or get you killed.
 
Originally posted by: Looney
Originally posted by: JD50
Originally posted by: Looney
Originally posted by: JD50
Originally posted by: Looney
Originally posted by: PELarson
Originally posted by: fisheerman
spurred by another topic:

I haven't seen the mainstream media presenting this in the whole gun control arguement have you?

article

By two people with guns actually. What no one on the "yeah gotta have my 6 shooter with me at all times crowd" mentions is that ONE OF THEM WAS A OFF DUTY OR FORMER LEO, different sources say differently! So one would expect that he took control of the situation and once the murderer was subdued made sure that all weapons where out of reach of the murder and the people who subdued him, in plain site, and as soon as the police arrived in loud contact with the police who where coming on the scene.

Now how many of the yahoo gotta carry at all times crowd would know or have the ability in a stress situation to handle themselves correctly? 1 in 20 if that!

Add to that you're running around with a gun trying to become a hero, and another hero with his gun sees you running around with a gun and pops one off at you. Or the police sniper takes you out not knowing whether you're the real shooter or not, or just a wanna-be hero.

Well, we have seen what happens when you two get your way (keeping eeeeevil guns out of the hands of law abiding citizens), and its much worse than what either of you THINK would have happened if someone else had a gun.

If i had a gun it would be used for self-defense, not to be a hero. That incident was lucky that one of the 'heroes' was an actual cop... if you had run up with your gun and saw 2 guys pointing guns at one another, who would you shoot? both of them?


If there is some loon running around shooting people wouldn't it be in your best interest to stop him? Sorry this isn't the movies, people don't get into a staring contest while pointing guns at each other, it doesn't happen that way.

And if somebody else has a gun and sees you running with one, what is going to stop him from assuming you're not the bad guy and popping one off at you?

YOU'RE the one that needs to wake up and realize this isn't the movies, and if you're running around trying to be a hero, other people with hero complexes are going to be as trigger happy as you, and seeing you running around with a gun, will probably gun you down... or you'll shoot the wrong person.


Well first of all you'd have to assess the situation and not just shoot someone that you see holding a gun. Lets see we have one guy with a bandolier of ammo shooting unarmed people and you have another guy hiding around a corner with his gun trying to aim in on the guy shooting unarmed people.....Second, do you have any evidence to back up your theory because there is plenty of evidence saying the exact opposite, mainly the OP. There are plenty of states that issue CCW permits so it really shouldn't be too hard for you to find all of these types of scenarios playing out the way that you think it would.

BTW, I'm not sure why you say that I'm "trigger happy" just because I am a proponent of concealed carry....
 
I stick by what I said before. I think all schools should arm and train all the people who work at the schools. It would either stop all school killings, or atleast prevents a larger number of innocent kids being killed because a trained teacher could take out the would be shooter before they went on a shooting spree.

Metal detectors don't work, counseling doesn't work, but I bet if all the teachers, and staff was armed, none of the student would dare thing to whip out a gun, and take out other students for fear they may be shot, not in a life threating way, may live to see another day and pay for what they tried to do, and not get the easy way out.

You take away the gun control, and the nuts, and the ones who will break the law, will still have them, and can do what they want at will, who is to stop them, when the decent, law abiding, citizens, dont have a way to protect themselves, and by the time the cops show up, to many people have already lost their lives.

In a perfect world, trying to take guns off the street will only take the guns out of the hands of the sane, law abiding people. The whack jobs, and criminals, will see it as a open door to do what ever they like for no fear of anyone shooting them back, other then another criminal, or whack job, and that wont happen. Do you think if they passed a no gun law a criminal, or whacko will give a rats ass? Hell no, they will go out and shoot who ever, when ever, who is to stop them, because Johnny do good wont break the law and gave up his gun so he cannot shoot back. So criminal with a gun, or you with a empty hand, who do you think will win?

So you pack all the teachers with heat, and the only time they draw is when one of these kids decide they want to go shooting other kids, then they take them out right then and there. Less innocent kids die, and that one, may still live to pay for what he/she has done. Nothing else will work, IMO.
 
Originally posted by: Looney
How about quit being John Wayne and realize that this isn't the movies, and you running around with a gun will probably cause more panic or get you killed.

So of all the times a citizen has used their weapon to protect themselves and the lives of others has your hypothetical BS ever happened?

I don't see how you can not see all the GOOD that came from this story. It happens all the time, just not reported and many times the fact that the victim used a weapon to protect themselves is left out of the news.
 
Originally posted by: PELarson
Originally posted by: JD50
Originally posted by: Looney
Originally posted by: PELarson
Originally posted by: fisheerman
spurred by another topic:

I haven't seen the mainstream media presenting this in the whole gun control arguement have you?

article

By two people with guns actually. What no one on the "yeah gotta have my 6 shooter with me at all times crowd" mentions is that ONE OF THEM WAS A OFF DUTY OR FORMER LEO, different sources say differently! So one would expect that he took control of the situation and once the murderer was subdued made sure that all weapons where out of reach of the murder and the people who subdued him, in plain site, and as soon as the police arrived in loud contact with the police who where coming on the scene.

Now how many of the yahoo gotta carry at all times crowd would know or have the ability in a stress situation to handle themselves correctly? 1 in 20 if that!

Add to that you're running around with a gun trying to become a hero, and another hero with his gun sees you running around with a gun and pops one off at you. Or the police sniper takes you out not knowing whether you're the real shooter or not, or just a wanna-be hero.

Well, we have seen what happens when you two get your way (keeping eeeeevil guns out of the hands of law abiding citizens), and its much worse than what either of you THINK would have happened if someone else had a gun.

Ahhh.. another MUST CARRY GUN, DON"T KNOW HOW TO USE GUN, MUST CARRY GUN! advocate.

Nowhere have I advocated banning guns. Now banning idiots that think(?) returning to the Wild West will make this country safer from carry permits and hand gun ownership might not be a bad idea.

Hey dipsh1t I was a cop for 3 years I know perfectly well how to use a gun. No one is advocating a return to the wild west, advocating CCW permits is not the same as saying that everyone should go around shooting people for the hell of it. Take your strawman somewhere.

 
Originally posted by: JD50

Well first of all you'd have to assess the situation and not just shoot someone that you see holding a gun. Lets see we have one guy with a bandolier of ammo shooting unarmed people and you have another guy hiding around a corner with his gun trying to aim in on the guy shooting unarmed people.....Second, do you have any evidence to back up your theory because there is plenty of evidence saying the exact opposite, mainly the OP. There are plenty of states that issue CCW permits so it really shouldn't be too hard for you to find all of these types of scenarios playing out the way that you think it would.

BTW, I'm not sure why you say that I'm "trigger happy" just because I am a proponent of concealed carry....

Yeah, as if a digg article from the source 'cyber news' is really credible.

And you really think innocent people with handguns have never been gunned down before because of mis-identifying? Even cops have been known to shoot and killed kids with toy guns, let alone citizens with real guns.
 
Originally posted by: Looney
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Looney
YOU'RE the one that needs to wake up and realize this isn't the movies, and if you're running around trying to be a hero, other people with hero complexes are going to be as trigger happy as you, and seeing you running around with a gun, will probably gun you down... or you'll shoot the wrong person.

Nobody is going to shoot somebody else without making sure there is imminent danger to themselves or others.

Quite making stuff up and take a firearm class.

How about quit being John Wayne and realize that this isn't the movies, and you running around with a gun will probably cause more panic or get you killed.

WTF is with you people? There is nothing "John Wayne" about protecting yourself. Show some proof of all of these people with CCW permits causing all of these problems or stop posting.

 
Originally posted by: JD50
Hey dipsh1t I was a cop for 3 years I know perfectly well how to use a gun. No one is advocating a return to the wild west, advocating CCW permits is not the same as saying that everyone should go around shooting people for the hell of it. Take your strawman somewhere.

To that point, don't almost all policemen advocate CCW? The chief might not because it may be bad PR, but the feet on the street do.

Or so I've read and heard from many interviews with officers.
 
Back
Top