Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: DragonMasterAlex
Yes, but when I get there I will arrive with my finances in order and my retirement properly planned so I don't have to lobby for the enslavement of a new generation to pay for my expenses. If all the old geezers were actually as *RESPONSIBLE* as they complain about others not being, they wouldn't give a damn about Social Security.
Jason
Your attitude toward the elderly is one of the reasons this nation is in the sorry shape it's in today. Any nation that disrespects its elders as you do is bound for trouble. The elderly aren't a burden. They are a resource. You should try listening to them sometime. You might learn something.
I have TONS of respect for elderly people: that doesn't mean they have a right to enslave younger generations. As I've said before: Pay them what they're owed, then let the system die as it should. Start from the bottom up and require training on the handling of finances and the marketplace, including heavy emphasis on retirement planning, at all levels of public education. It's never too early to start.
Or, in your case, maybe not.
I hope I'm still around when all of your perfect plans come face to face with this imperfect world. I would truly like to be there to see your reaction when reality introduces itself into your well laid plans. You are apparently either too young or too ignorant -- or maybe both -- to realize that everyone who came before you made everything you have possible. Your hatred of the elderly and attempts to foment generational warfare say all anyone needs to know about you.
I never said I had "perfect plans", did I? I am fully aware that plans go awry and sh1t happens. Just look at the sorry state of SS today and you can see CLEARLY that it became a monster that no one could have foreseen or intended. It's time to let that monster die.
As to "generational warfare", the elderly declared war on the young before we were even born. Social Security, Welfare, enormous Social Spending programs that you initiated to run for *generations*, to be paid for by your children and grandchildren with no consent, no discussion, no
choice at all.
Further, the skyrocketing cost of HOUSING in many places, noteably California, is largely thanks to the ELDERLY who lobby against *any* new construction, growth or change, directly leading to a shortage of housing and the artificial inflation of those housing prices to levels that the young cannot afford. The Elderly have effectively given the bird to the young and said clearly: "Hey, we got ours, so fvck all of you!"
I'll say this for you: You're very consistent in your attempts to JUSTIFY why it's OK for the elderly to hold a leash around the necks of the young.
When you do get old, if you do get old, I hope you have to deal with people just like yourself. That would be poetic justice, IMO.
Oh I hope so too! At least I would be dealing with HONEST people who don't try to justify the enslavement of some men to others.
But maybe you'll get lucky and never have the chance. You never know. All of your saving and planning could be a waste of time if you check out before retirement. 😉
Another lesson you apparently haven't learned yet. Tomorrow isn't guaranteed.
Actually I'm very highly aware of that and point it out constantly to people such as yourself who are willing to trade Liberty for (a false promise of) security. There is no such thing as a guarantee of safety, and those who seek it can be clearly said to have a total failure to understand *nature*.
I always considered Social Security as exactly what I was told it should be all through my working life. One leg in a three legged stool. And that's what it is in my case.
BTW, if your Republican "leaders" would stop creating record budget deficits every time they're in power the Social Security surplus would be large enough to fully fund the system ad infinitum.
If indeed you only think of it as one leg and have planned accordingly, then my hat's off to you. A significant number of geezers have instead thought of it as their ENTIRE retirement plan, and for those I offer no sympathy at all. They have no one to blame but themselves for their resultant poverty.
As for the R's (who, incidentally, are NOT my party), yes, they SHOULD stop spending the way they do. In fact if I were to point out ONE failing of the Founding Fathers, it's that they didn't EXPLICITLY outlaw deficit spending for all but wartime activities. History is clear enough that Democrats and Republicans alike LOVE to spend, spend, spend, regardless of consequences or means. Don't pretend like there is a difference between the two parties; there isn't.
Get this straight you louzy little piker, no worker who has been forced to pay FICA taxes their entire life is irresponsible. The irresponsible parties are the ideologues whose goal has been to destroy Social Security since its inception. The "leaders" who created the deficits that Social Security funds were used to finance. And those people, yourself included, who are foolish enough to buy into this scheme to defraud workers out of a benefit they were forced to fund and therefore believed they could depend on in their retirement.
Actually a good many of them ARE irresponsible, and you can discern them easily: They're the ones who cry out that without their SS they CAN'T make their bills, because they didn't even bother to THINK about retirement in a realistic way. No one, sadly, has been out to "destroy SS since it's inception" 70+ years ago. Fortunately if nothing is done to fix the problems inherent in SS it will die of its own momentum, and I look forward to that day.
Additionally, no one--NO ONE--has even *mentioned* the possibility of "defrauding workers out of a benefit they were forced to fun". The ONLY thing we've heard so far is the idea that workers be given a CHOICE in how to invest THEIR OWN MONEY. No one has even SUGGESTED telling you how to invest yours or taking your choice away. Choice was taken away when Social Security was STARTED, as you've so many times now pointed out. Remember you were FORCED to pay FICA, you didn't CHOOSE to pay it, just like the rest of us. Only somewhere along the way you became convinced that others have a RIGHT to force you to spend your own earnings in THEIR way rather than your own. What a sad state of mind you have.
My generation didn't create Social Security. But we paid our share. Since 1983, the largest share of FICA taxes since the program's inception. Now people like you have the nerve to suggest retirees are collecting some kind of welfare.
I say thanks everyday that I was able to retire before you people succeeded in destroying Social Security and robbing me of the benefit I worked and paid for all my life.
Now do what I did for almost fifty years. Get your a$$ to work and STFU.
If your generation didn't create it, then why aren't you as outraged as the rest of us that you are FORCED to pay into a system you never chose, never voted for, never were even ASKED about? I haven't suggested retirees are collecting welfare, I've suggested--and rightly so--that retirees collect more than they have paid in. That in itself is not a bad thing when you consider that you SHOULD have been getting paid interest on that money. The bad thing is that with the longer ages of retired folks and the better health and larger percentage of them, there are FEWER people actually working to pay all that money back.
Again, in spite of your pitiful cries to the contrary, no one has suggested robbing you of a damned thing. If you're over 55, no changes have been suggested. If you're UNDER 55, the only publically announced changes are the inclusion of the OPTION to invest some of your own money into the stock market rather than the SS system. Tell me, how does the inclusion of CHOICE for those who fund the system in the first place constitute robbery?
As per your usual standards, your argument consists of baseless emotionalist reactionaryism.
And be sure to keep those cards and letters coming. 😉
Well of course I will, because you know I do so love these endlessly fruitless bouts of afternoon banter, you old fart
🙂
Jason