Hey DJ Quibbles, how do you quantify reasonable?
Something that has a foundation in logic but may be flawed to perception or other limiting factors.
Hey DJ Quibbles, how do you quantify reasonable?
Hey DJ Quibbles, how do you quantify reasonable?
So to you, examples over a period of time, over a large set of locations is me going to such lengths. So, you would rather examples in a small geographic area over a short period of time. Do you realize how silly that sounds?
As for reducing reasonable speech, I provided one. Ben Shapiro is a hard core conservative. He is also a person that does reasonable debates and tries to engage the Left. When he went to Berkeley he needed 600 officers because the PC side lost their minds.
I think the problem you have is that you see PC as simply not being offensive and taking others feelings into consideration. That is wrong and that is likely why you can't understand this.
Only an arrogant ass like Shapiro would insist on appearing in person at Berkeley, the home of the radical left since the 60's. He knew what to expect but he was happy to have the university spend $600K to protect his sorry ass. It's great publicity & it's free.
So persecuted! Never mind that he's spoken in a variety of other venues all across the country.
So, how many examples of the "radical left" before you admit it's part of it? I'm not saying it's all, but it does seem apparent that it's there.
Also, that radical left school was the bedrock of the modern free speech movement.
As for a variety of other venues lol. He was literally prevented from speaking at one place because of safety. He had to do an off site location.
It’s not personal. We may not be part of the larger groups, but people like you and I can do far more to move the needle. Perhaps its simple things like volunteering to mentor underpriviliged kids to pursue STEM fields, or making our social networks available to under represented minorities, or volunteering our time to charities. Not out of guilt or obligation, but out of recognition that we are in a position of privilege because someone at some point lifted us up, and now its time to return the favor.Why make it personal, when it isn't? It's not you and me doing this. It's larger groups of which you and I are not even remotely significant factors. And do let me know when oppressive people really take time to listen to the subjugated.
At best, the oppressed are heard. But the oppressors are not listening. Most in the dominant class won't even acknowledge their tacit role in the oppression. Always, the endless cries (to drown out the voices of the oppressed) mewling "I'm not racist! Don't call me that horrible name! My precious feelings!"
Yeh, a guy who called for sedition laws sets himself up as a champion of free speech, not to mention all the other really shitty things he's said. Drawing protesters is his biggest claim to fame.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Shapiro#Views
Is it okay to use the word master for hard drives?
I have not seen any major revamp in how chairs are made.What about chairs being too small for fat people and thus offensive?
What about banning clapping because it excludes deaf people?
Not world ending, but, very stupid and great examples of how dumb PC culture can be. Its not just about making people nicer.
Looking at my UEFI I see that I still have a master hard drive.
I have not seen any major revamp in how chairs are made.
Last I checked people still clap, TV shows still have clapping in their soundtracks, and it is still considered normal, and expected behavior.
None of those things actually happened. Sure people proposed them, and society said no. Under some circumstances, they might taken up. If your audience is mainly deaf maybe don't expect clapping. but this is not PC culture, this is just culture. This is how it works, a groups of people make a suggestion, and people either agree and society changes to accommodate, or they don't and not much happens. Everything you just posted is an example of not much happening. Why is PC culture such a problem if when it is actually stupid we all just ignore it?
2 reasons.
Its growing and had changed some things.
People are becoming more accepting of PC stupidity.
Now, you are falling victim to your bias just like others have. That PC culture outputs things like Evergreen, or Berkeley where violence happens. PC culture has a foundation that is not just "don't be mean". If it were limited to people making suggestions and society deciding to pick it up or not, then totally fine. The problem is that is very far from what is happening.
How so? Sure in some limited places under limited circumstances you have extremes, but that is true about almost any topic you can name. Overall when people suggests something stupid in the name of political correctness society gets a good laugh at it and continues on ignoring it, as is clearly shown by every example put forward. Anything that society does not ignore is things that people have decided is indeed a problem and have decided to change to accommodate. That is literally how society works. This is nothing new. This is nothing unusual. The only thing new is we gave this age old process a new name.
It sounds like you want to do things that you can see and feel. Acting locally, as it were.It’s not personal. We may not be part of the larger groups, but people like you and I can do far more to move the needle. Perhaps its simple things like volunteering to mentor underpriviliged kids to pursue STEM fields, or making our social networks available to under represented minorities, or volunteering our time to charities. Not out of guilt or obligation, but out of recognition that we are in a position of privilege because someone at some point lifted us up, and now its time to return the favor.
I'm not as familiar with his arguments as it sounds like you are.Something that has a foundation in logic but may be flawed to perception or other limiting factors.
I'm not as familiar with his arguments as it sounds like you are.
Can you pick a couple examples of arguments he has put forward that meet your standard?
NAMBLA is a horrible little group, but, they are so extreme and so small that they are not a worry to society in general. We agree with that idea.
The problem with PC culture is that its becoming far more popular.
Being PC used to be about trying not to be offensive. The problem is that is all subjective, and, people do not agree on what is or is not. The Right has shifted and was very much about stopping people from offending their religious beliefs. Now, they are taking up the side that says it should be okay to be offensive. Conversely the Left has flipped in the exact opposite way.
So, PC culture is not really about trying to be less offensive, as the Left has no problem offending people that are on the Right. What PC culture is doing is deciding what selected groups should be protected in terms of being offended. That is too much power and was the foundation of having very open laws about speech.
The good news, is that people are starting to see PC culture for what it is, and are starting to push back against it. But, if the argument is that PC culture is just about being nice, that is factually wrong.
I don't agree with your premise. What metric are you using to determine PC culture is becoming more popular? Certainly not polls as this thread says exactly the opposite of your claim.
Sounds to me like someone is suffering from confirmation bias.
You cant see how the number of PC people could grow, and, the number of anti-PC people could grow?
The reason for that is not everyone is pro or anti PC.
You didn't answer the question.
Huh? Did Starbuck crib from Shapiro? Or was it not clear I was asking about Shapiro?You likely know him better than I do.
Post 131 seems like something reasonable. I can't view his profile so I can't easily see his posts.
What might be easier is for you to give me something you think he said that was unreasonable and see if I could pick away at it.
This is not correct.Oh, then the measure is largely anecdotal. The fact that comedians in large part avoid college campuses as too many are now offended.
Huh? Did Starbuck crib from Shapiro? Or was it not clear I was asking about Shapiro?
Neat. I was talking about you citing Shapiro as someone who put forward reasonable arguments.I have not been following your discussion. I'm about to get on a flight, so Ill see if I can find what you two said later.
I don't agree with your premise. What metric are you using to determine PC culture is becoming more popular? Certainly not polls as this thread says exactly the opposite of your claim.
Sounds to me like someone is suffering from confirmation bias.
What does that have to do with the violence? You just tried to disprove that PC culture is more than being nice by saying that he is a hypocrite.