The interesting thing is that AMD is so quick to start a marketing campaign intended to smear nvidia's g-sync (even the name, FS, is a direct offshoot of g-sync) which has been proven in the field, yet they remain completely mum on the technical details behind freesync. I can't think of any reviewer who hasn't said g-sync isn't a game changer. Even linus of linustechtips made the ROG Swift panel his daily driver (he said this on the wan show), and you will not find any reviewer who loves IPS panels more than him. Yet despite that, he is using the Swift as his daily panel for everything, and said he couldn't imagine gaming without it.
Could FS match this? Maybe. I think an alternative is great. However, I find AMD's smear campaign to be utterly ridiculous because #1) FS is still far away from being purchasable and #2) They will give no details on it despite being the ones behind the 1.2A optional extensions. That was their doing. But now they don't want to tell us what the tech details are? What do they have to hide?
I'm not so sure there's anything to think about rationally. AMD has given us nothing except slinging mud at nvidia, really. As classy as their marketing is, I do like the fact that NV generally goes into further detail into the how and why things work as they do with g-sync. Tom Pederson went into depth of a lot of things, what would it hurt for AMD to actually answer the questions behind this. After all they're the ones so intent on slinging mud at NV but they will tell us nothing about FS. What's up with that? Why exactly are we debating something that AMD has told us nearly NOTHING about? This thread is rather pointless with that in mind. We're at the point of where if AMD thinks FS is that great, maybe it is, but shut up and either 1) prove it or 2) provide technical details of how and why.
AT THE VERY LEAST. Give us technical details. NV gave a ton of technical info about g-sync before the hardware even went into production. All of the hows and whys of how it is beneficial and good for gamers. What has AMD done? Nothing. If you can do nothing but sling mud at NV, you better believe your solution be as good as ULMB/g-sync. And share the techinical details. If it isn't then AMD should shut the hell up and stop throwing mud at your competitor with a proven solution that all reviewers love.