I can't believe the answer was they were incompetent...
I didn't know they were still under that agreement.
2024... l didn't know it was that bad! GF is going to kill AMD's cpu division at this rate, even if Zen can be somewhat competitive.
I am guessing you guys already knew this, but it's news to me.
April 17th, 2015 at 3:58 am - Author Anton Shilov
Advanced Micro Devices on Thursday revealed that it had signed a new wafer supply agreement (WSA) with GlobalFoundries for 2015. Based on the disclosed terms of the agreement, AMD will significantly reduce purchases from GlobalFoundries, which indicates that the company projects further declines of PC-related product shipments this year.
Under the terms of the new agreement, AMD expects wafer purchases from GlobalFoundries to be approximately $1 billion this year on a take-or-pay basis, which is a decline from 2014. Last year AMD planned to spend $1.2 billion on purchases from GlobalFoundries, but its actual purchases from the company in 2014 were approximately $1 billion due to lower fourth quarter purchases.
http://www.kitguru.net/components/g...alfoundries-expects-further-apu-cpu-declines/
AMD is using it for higher GPUs.
The only reason AMD use 14LPP anywhere is the WSA. And that one first expires no sooner than March 2nd, 2024.
The word monomaniacal comes to mind.Very funny forum. Everyone is arguing a person's position rather than technology or fact. Now I really understand why studying psychology is much more interesting in AT. I'd better be a bystander afterwards.D:
Well, we haven't received any comment from AMD, so we can't say they are denying it. That's the point. It's not uncommon for companies like Intel and AMD to comment on these issues. And Reuters etc is no "cheapskate site". It's apparently credible enough for them to publish it. So calling it "baseless" like you did is outright ridiculous and in fact a lie.
10 years of incompetence and you are still surprised? 🙂
A chapter 11 restructuring back then would have given a much healthier company today.
Here are my Athlon x4 860K/GT730 GDDR5 Firestrike Results:
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/10105262
Score: 1493
GPU score: 1614
Physics score: 4439
And here is the Firestrike score for a stock A10-7870K with DDR3 2800 (edit: It was run at DDR3 2133 speeds for the test)
http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/7270/amd-series-a10-7870k-kaveri-refresh-apu-review/index6.html
Score: 1351
GPU score: 1498
Physics score: 4902
So going by GPU score GT 730 GDDR5 is 7.7% faster than a 512sp iGPU @ 866 Mhz with DDR328002133. Now granted the Athlon x 4 860K CPU doesn't throttle, but I don't know how much that factors into this benchmark.
So AMD is using TSMC 16nm or GF 14nm for the next gen high end GPUs?
P.S. I am under the impression Fury is using GF 28nm, but the rest of the current GPU line-up is using TSMC 28nm.