AMD vs INTEL (POLL)

dnuggett

Diamond Member
Sep 13, 2003
6,703
0
76
Let the flames begin. These types of threads are generally worthless. BTW you aren't asking about a CPU you are asking about a company, and this is how flame wars get started. Why don't you ask about 2 specific CPUs? Then the thread can have some intelligent conversation.
 

xSkyDrAx

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2003
7,706
1
0
Indeed these are the embers that ignite into a flame war. Do be more specific.
 

mechBgon

Super Moderator<br>Elite Member
Oct 31, 1999
30,699
1
0
Allow me to be the first to say "
rolleye.gif
."
 

fredtam

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2003
5,694
2
76
A month ago (and quite a few months before that) I would have said Intel but now an Athlon 64 3000 would make the better system unless you use the system primarily for encoding. This is without getting stupid expensive. That doesn't mean that AMD is king because you really won't notice a difference between a 2.8c and a 3000+ in normal use. The only time that small % of extra speed will help is for people who use DC apps, rendering apps, and computational apps. These are really the only things that current processors still take a long time to do. It mah be able to save a couple hours processing time over a few days. Are you really going to be able to see the difference in 80fps & 90fps. I think not.

Intel = good
AMD = good
Competition = good
Fanboys = sux.

I vote for faster cheaper CPUs.
 

Swanny

Diamond Member
Mar 29, 2001
7,456
0
76
IMHO (as with any post in a thread like this) the Athlon FX is the best CPU for gaming.
 

Metalloid

Diamond Member
Jan 18, 2002
3,064
0
0
After you are done voting here, go find an NVidia vs. ATI poll in the video forum and vote in that too.

I swear, we get one of these every single day.
 

slaves123

Member
Oct 8, 2003
184
0
0
As my sign may tell you I prefer AMD over all, but it's completly true that there should be specified models, and also the CPU is not all for gaming, you have to consider also the video card and the RAM, this can't be answered by one company, I in my little oppinion prefer AMD, but Intel is not bad, far from that
 

sirplayalot

Senior member
Nov 27, 2003
596
23
81
im not tryin to have anyone flame me. I've only been a member for a month or 2. And i dont know how i can be more specific except that if you were to take the best AMD and the best INTEL proccesor, wich would run the games better :)
 

Shimmishim

Elite Member
Feb 19, 2001
7,504
0
76
the question is.. how do you define better?

come on now, the human eye can't detect the difference between 150 fps and 160 fps

the fx may be the fastest chip out but seriously now, you have to consider cost and performance and other stuff before you can really say something is "better" than something else
 

fredtam

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2003
5,694
2
76
You should relly be more concerned with your vid card. Come back with the cpu question when you need to know which one is going to render something faster because you need to get a job donein X amount of time in order to recieve a paycheck.
 

Wuzup101

Platinum Member
Feb 20, 2002
2,334
37
91
Both are good processors, and while the power strugle is very close, AMD seems to hold the value crown. Most people on this forum don't have the ability to shell out $1000 for the newest processor when it comes out every few months. Many of us define which is "best" by which solution offers us more for our money. I have to say the recent trends in overclocking, value, and overall speed point to AMD (for now).

Competition is great for us as consumers. If either company would ever "win" the war we would be screwed in the future b/c they would surely raise their prices. Every time someone comes out with something new we benifit becacuse we get newer technology and faster speeds at lower prices... which is what we all want!