Weird, I was looking at the same page before and now it’s there. Anyway thanks, will try later. I rolled back from 3402 to 3202 because the beta gave me lots of WHEA errors at 1800 fclk at the same settings.
Thanks for the mini review this will be helpful for me when I update the bios tomorrow and start my own testing.Just updated to 188.8.131.52 final on my Prime X570 Pro. Old IF clocks and voltages again generated lots of WHEA errors in HWInfo and Event Viewer, same as the beta. I had it set for 1800 MHz Fclk and DRAM clock, 1.025V SoC, 0.975V VDDG IOD and CCD, 0.95V VDDP. It's (maybe?) stable now at 1.1V SoC, 1.025V VDDG IOD/SOC, 0.9V VDDP. I'm starting to suspect that maybe the 184.108.40.206 beta just didn't have the capability to report its errors to Windows and it was just correcting errors silently that whole time. Who knows though, going to stick with this for now and see if it generates errors eventually.
View attachment 39266
Updated so I remember: reduced VSoC to 1.05, tried VDDG CCD 0.95 / IOD 1.025 but didn't work, raised to 1.0 / 1.025 and working so far. Did not work with both VDDGs at 1.0V ('Auto' now results in 1.0 for both ... it was definitely 0.95 in earlier releases, so ASUS knows that these need to be messed with to make things stable with Zen 3). No errors in 10 min which is the best I've done since 220.127.116.11 which probably just ignored corrected bus errors.
Anyone trued the " New " CTR 2.0 RC3 ?
Just ran the diagnostics ---- with a hard reset after 5 mins
( never completed )
Passed it's own 10 min stability test at it's selected 4350Ghz
( boost mode )
And he says it's " safe " ? lol
Oddly ---- it's says I have a " bronze" sample.
( maybe a indicator of it's underclocking ability ? if so, Ok. I believe that )
The analysis is questionable.
Afterall, I have not see anyone yet to surpass my results.
UCLK = MCLK is set in the uEFI, but it always defaults to 1/2 speed in the end. It was at least fun playing around with. A higher FCLK might offset some of the penalty, but the WHEA errors pop up beyond 1933 FCLK.It's your UCLK ---- it's at 1/2
Thats the weird divider thing I was talking about.
You are the only one that I know of that got this to almost " stick "
( but your not at DDR - you need 2200 for UCLK )
What software are you using to check temps?Just finished updating my rig from a from an old Rampage IV 1680v2 (4.6GHz) to the Asus Dark HERO VIII with a 5800x...Wow what a difference lol! When I first booted up at stock setting I was getting temps in the low 80's using some crappy thermal paste I had laying around. When I would enable the AMD PBO CO with -15 and 100 boost I would hit 90c in CB R20 MT. So I ordered some Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut and reset my Corsair 150i cooler. I guess I had done a bad job with the other paste. After reapply the new paste my temps were in the low 70s at stock running CB R20 MT.
My current settings as of now:
ram 3800/1900flck 16-19-16-36-60 1T 1.38v DOCP is 3600
MB setting all auto besides amd advanced PBO
AMD PBO setting
-30 all cores
limits = motherboard
boost = 100
going beyond 100 at - 30 and my system becomes unstable in idle states and this also hits 80c where the 5800x stops increasing boost in MT loads. I may try to tune some per core to see if I can get idle states stable at 125 boost. But I'm not sure the time is worth the reward. What I have now seems to be working good and temps are at 80c in R20 MT and sustain 4.68-4.7ghz.
I updated the Ryzen master app version and now both HWinfo and it show the same temps.Im using Ryzen Master and HWinfo. I haven't seen much difference in temp reading. My motherboard QLed shows CPU package temp which is about 10c under the ccx temp of Ryzen master. The apps you are using are probably looking at the package temp.
I did remount my cooler and reapplied some Artic Silver 5 but not seeing a reduction in temps in cinibench.I was getting 90c on R20 MT prior to redoing my paste and being more careful applying it with my H150i. Using thermal grizzly now im at 80c in R20MT. In Aida 64 stress test im in the lower 70s.
I'm on the Pro RGB model which uses a Asetek pump and only 1600 RPM fans all models after that are using a CoolIT pump and 2400 RPM fans. Which also makes them louder when you crank the fans speeds.
Ryzen Master has Core 04 as my best core and Core 01 as second fastest.I must have an older model then my original fan where 1600 rpm. I got it as a renewed item from corsair on amazon LOL.
I found there is a fine line for Curve vs boost.
To much boost and to much negative curve you are unstable at idle.
to much boost and not not enough curve and you are thermal throttled.
I can reduced my curve to say -15 and up my boost to 200 get better single core scores but then multithread performance drops from hitting 80C not allowing higher boost levels and clock stretching. Its kind of like robbing Peter to pay Paul lol. This is why Asus Dark Hero has the dynamic switching feature. You can tune your PBO curve for single thread then tune a manual OC for MT work loads.
This board and CPU are new to me, I just got it last week. Now that I'm starting to figure out how this PBO curve stuff works next is to tune PBO curve for single thread and setup Dynamic OC for MT workloads. As I play around with stuff I will post my finding.
How do you determine that with it?Got to finally fiddle with my setup a little bit; my 5600X is 'silver sample' according to CRT... feels so runner up
Always a bridesmaid, never a bride.
|Thread starter||Similar threads||Forum||Replies||Date|
|Question Ryzen 5000 series having worrying failure rate||CPUs and Overclocking||36|
|Question Undervolting, PBO, AutoOC on Ryzen 5000||CPUs and Overclocking||14|
|K||Discussion Ryzen 5000 Two chiplet CPUs - differences between chiplets||CPUs and Overclocking||19|
|Question Apple M1 vs AMD Ryzen 5000||CPUs and Overclocking||7|
|K||Question AMD Ryzen 5000 - AVAILABILITY||CPUs and Overclocking||549|