Question AMD Rembrandt/Zen 3+ APU Speculation and Discussion

Page 22 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

izaic3

Member
Nov 19, 2019
61
96
91
Alright, so we've had some leaks so far. I don't know if any of it's been confirmed yet, as it's pretty early, but here is what I've surmised so far (massive grain of salt of course):

If if turns out to have RDNA 2 and 12 CU, I could see iGPU performance potentially almost doubling over Cezanne.

If I've made any mistakes or gotten anything wrong, please let me know. I'd also love to hear more knowledgeable people weigh in on their expectations.
 
Last edited:

ahimsa42

Senior member
Jul 16, 2016
225
194
116
Because you'll be even more bandwidth limited unless you pony up for really expensive DDR5.
some people think that the DDR5 will not be much more expensive than DDR4 but it will likely come with a premium when it is first available but may not be more than 10-20% more per GB. Moores Law is Dead mentions this in a recent youtube video.
 

mikk

Diamond Member
May 15, 2012
4,299
2,383
136

scineram

Senior member
Nov 1, 2020
376
295
136
I think Rembrandt will be a pleasant surprise, just based on the fact that it is a 6nm design and AMD already over-delivered on their first 6nm design - MI250 datacenter GPU.

Also, there are rumors that Navi33 will be be doing extremely well on 6nm...
Still Zen 3 with only 16MB L3. Alder Lake will destroy it except in GPU.
 

Harry_Wild

Senior member
Dec 14, 2012
860
169
106
I buy combo function chips for their bargain price & setup. The AMD igp is quite good for all things that I do. I do internet surfing, YouTube! videos and watching streaming content! Waiting for AMD 5600G or 5700G to come down in $$.
 

ahimsa42

Senior member
Jul 16, 2016
225
194
116
I'd argue most people would look at primarily the CPU. If they want good gaming performance they typically take a laptop with a discrete GPU. I think only having Zen3 and having less cores is a significant risk in the mobile segment for AMD.
depends on the games- even my 4500U will play a great deal of modern games at a decent framerate. rembrandt will be a significant increase over current igup's and will allow people to play even more games without having the extra cost & power draw of a DCG.
 

uzzi38

Platinum Member
Oct 16, 2019
2,746
6,655
146
I'd argue most people would look at primarily the CPU. If they want good gaming performance they typically take a laptop with a discrete GPU. I think only having Zen3 and having less cores is a significant risk in the mobile segment for AMD.
For the gaming laptop market sure.

Think and lights exist though, and they're significantly larger market.
 

ahimsa42

Senior member
Jul 16, 2016
225
194
116
For the gaming laptop market sure.

Think and lights exist though, and they're significantly larger market.

and like i said, depending on the games a thin & light can be just fine for most games-in fact for the games i play i will even very likely go with a 6800U instead of an H just so i can get a thin & light laptop instead of a heavier, hotter, more power hungry unit.
 

uzzi38

Platinum Member
Oct 16, 2019
2,746
6,655
146
and like i said, depending on the games a thin & light can be just fine for most games-in fact for the games i play i will even very likely go with a 6800U instead of an H just so i can get a thin & light laptop instead of a heavier, hotter, more power hungry unit.
What I've always been interested in is something like the Matebook 15. Large 90WHr+ battery, decent MT performance with a 35-45W sustained CPU/APU and a great screen. Ideally with no GPU for even better battery life

Rembrandt looks very, very, very nice for that kind of device.
 

Joe NYC

Diamond Member
Jun 26, 2021
3,656
5,199
136
most people buy an APU for the iGPU anyway though so this is a moot point

It is going to be a competitive situation. For Alder Lake to match graphics performance of Rembrandt, it would need an external dGPU, which would tip the scale of power efficiency to Rembrandt.

But it is possible that the high end ADL will outperform Rembrandt in pure CPU test, but we will see about power efficiency...
 

ahimsa42

Senior member
Jul 16, 2016
225
194
116
It is going to be a competitive situation. For Alder Lake to match graphics performance of Rembrandt, it would need an external dGPU, which would tip the scale of power efficiency to Rembrandt.

But it is possible that the high end ADL will outperform Rembrandt in pure CPU test, but we will see about power efficiency...
perhaps but i think most people get too caught up in the numbers sometimes. how many people are really going to be able to tell the difference in them in real world performance? it's like the whole FPS thing. unless they are competing online, without a counter can they really see the difference between a game at 60fps & 120 fps? also, how much is ADL going to cost compared to RMB?
 

Joe NYC

Diamond Member
Jun 26, 2021
3,656
5,199
136
perhaps but i think most people get too caught up in the numbers sometimes. how many people are really going to be able to tell the difference in them in real world performance? it's like the whole FPS thing. unless they are competing online, without a counter can they really see the difference between a game at 60fps & 120 fps? also, how much is ADL going to cost compared to RMB?

If you want to play any games, the biggest difference between playable and unplayable is on the low end and iGPU

Once you get to certain "escape" velocity, which I would say is at around AMD 6600 XT GPU, you can pretty much play everything, if you fiddle with the settings.

In other words, the difference between 8 FPS and 30 FPS is a difference between playable and unplayable. Difference between 60 FPS and 120 FPS is almost academic.

So between ADL and Rembrandt, the GPU performance difference is where the impact is the greatest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97

Spicy

Member
Oct 5, 2021
46
48
51
most people buy an APU for the iGPU anyway though so this is a moot point
I'd argue most people would look at primarily the CPU. If they want good gaming performance they typically take a laptop with a discrete GPU. I think only having Zen3 and having less cores is a significant risk in the mobile segment for AMD.
Depends if it's for laptop or minipc (x000U/H) or for desktop (x000G)
 

LightningZ71

Platinum Member
Mar 10, 2017
2,525
3,217
136
If you're really looking for a thin-and-light for light gaming, don't sleep on the 5700U. In a lot of games, the difference between the 5700u and the 5800u is nearly indistinguishable, and the 5700u is hundreds less in most situations. The iGPU on the 5700U is fully enabled with all 8 CUs, and, in most situations, both the 5700 and 5800 are severely GPU limited to the point that the CPU improvement for the 5800u is unnoticeable. In MT situations, the 5800U only barely edges out the 5700 in most situations. It's only in highly single threaded situations that the 5700 noticeably falls behind, and, even then, its not by a major degree.
 

ahimsa42

Senior member
Jul 16, 2016
225
194
116
If you want to play any games, the biggest difference between playable and unplayable is on the low end and iGPU

Once you get to certain "escape" velocity, which I would say is at around AMD 6600 XT GPU, you can pretty much play everything, if you fiddle with the settings.

In other words, the difference between 8 FPS and 30 FPS is a difference between playable and unplayable. Difference between 60 FPS and 120 FPS is almost academic.

So between ADL and Rembrandt, the GPU performance difference is where the impact is the greatest.
you seem to be speaking about FPS games which do not interest me in the least. i play TBS & RPG which have far lower system req's and look great at 1080p. most of the games i play have at most 1050ti or maybe 1060 as recommended GPU's. i think that having a thin light U processor close to a1050 level is not out of the question for rembrandt.
 

Joe NYC

Diamond Member
Jun 26, 2021
3,656
5,199
136
you seem to be speaking about FPS games which do not interest me in the least. i play TBS & RPG which have far lower system req's and look great at 1080p. most of the games i play have at most 1050ti or maybe 1060 as recommended GPU's. i think that having a thin light U processor close to a1050 level is not out of the question for rembrandt.

This applies to strategy games as well. You can take a cross section of games from Transport Fever 2 to Dyson Sphere, to Europa Universalis, and they are not super enjoyable at or below 1050 Ti level performance (perhaps EU4 is somewhat playable).

So this is the opposite end of the spectrum of FPS games, where you can still play with iGPU, and the difference of Rembrandt performance vs. ADL will make some difference.
 

andermans

Member
Sep 11, 2020
151
153
76
For the gaming laptop market sure.

Think and lights exist though, and they're significantly larger market.

Don't disagree, though most things I've seen people in that segment complain about are better served with a better CPU (or auxiliary functions like video encoding/decoding), not GPU, and hence AMD will likely have an uphill battle in that segment if they're behind on CPU. Not saying a better GPU won't be welcomed though.
 

ahimsa42

Senior member
Jul 16, 2016
225
194
116
This applies to strategy games as well. You can take a cross section of games from Transport Fever 2 to Dyson Sphere, to Europa Universalis, and they are not super enjoyable at or below 1050 Ti level performance (perhaps EU4 is somewhat playable).

So this is the opposite end of the spectrum of FPS games, where you can still play with iGPU, and the difference of Rembrandt performance vs. ADL will make some difference.
the 1st two games you mentioned are sims not TBS & the third one lists GTX560 as the recommended gpu which is quite a bit weaker than a non-ti 1050. the type of TBS games i am referring to are the Fantasy General remake, the upcoming Master of Magic remake & Songs of Conquest.