Yes iGPU was very good, but the CPU part was a little too weak on the Samsung 14nm back.
forums.anandtech.com
forums.anandtech.com
I wouldn't say that, outside of maybe CS2 where they're getting half decent framerates and the CPU might be having more effect.
Only game I have in common to test is Spiderman so I loaded that up on the 5700G. I am not using the +200MHz PBO right now, but the iGPU is 2400MHz with CL20 4133MT/s. Loaded a night save and got almost identical performance to Aussie Steve's. Loaded a midday save and ran and webslinged around the Radio City Music Hall and Rockefeller Plaza area. Averaged 35 with 29 low. So his average isn't far off mine, but his 1% suffered more. That makes the 8700G basically double in this game.
Close enough, or a CPU that almost no one bought next to the Ryzen 5 1600 or Ryzen 5 2600 competition.
Unless something changed with recent drivers, the 5700G used to provide around 80-100% more perf than the 2CU RDNA2.
The I5-8400 was popular here, but then again all I5 x4xxx were tbh. Until the Ryzen 3/5 APU came along and petty much ended the I3 and I5 reign. Raven Ridge did that. Now Intel recovered ground because Ryzen 3 APUs petty much not longer exist anymore after the 3200G was discontinued.Close enough, or a CPU that almost no one bought next to the Ryzen 5 competition.
Intel Core i5-8500 3.0 GHz Review
Intel's $200 Core i5-8500 is part of the second wave of Coffee Lake CPUs, released earlier this year. The processor comes with six cores and six threads and will boost up to 4.1 GHz. Our testing shows that even at higher thread counts, it won't ever go below 3.9 GHz, which will make life...www.techpowerup.com
Yeah, the average of those ones is 80%, so it is a difference from 63%. That review had DDR5-6400 vs 6000, so 6-7% more memory bandwidth there which probably helps HUB's numbers. There's games in there where the average framerates at 17 and 10 FPS though, I wouldn't read too much much into it being a bit different that another review showing the 5700G being relatively 20% faster at easier games and settings.
I forgot to add Ryzen 5 processor models, now i edited the post. I was primarily thinking about the initial first Ryzen R5 1000/2000 series 6/12 CPU competition.
Unfortunately certain people want bigger and bigger NPUs so MALL gets left behind.
IGPs were needed for that. Raven Ridge not only ended I3 and I5 reign but it also killed the entire low end line of GPUs... before Raven there were a large market of crap GPUs, GT710, GT 730, the GT1030... Nvidia has not launched another GPU in that area, simply because it would be need to be too expensive in order to outperform the APUs.
Mindfactory again, when we have available DiY sales figures. i5 8500 sales figures are very miserable, i5 8400 did a little better. But that's all weak, compared to two very popular Ryzen 5 models without iGPU.
Yep, Newegg has new 5000 series processors too, and 8700G/8600G. The onl thing not in stock is 8500G
If there were any software support, it would be excellent to have the ability to run AI completely separate from graphics. Currently, running stable diffusion pegs your GPU and incurs quite a visible hit to desktop rendering performance; Things like watching youtube becomes a lot less responsive when using GPU acceleration. AI adoption across the market is inevitable as content generation gets added to more programs and expanded upon. Disaggregating execution from across the SOC into an NPU frees up a lot of system resources.
They did release, it's just not popular and don't offer good value for money, GTX 1630, which is worse than 1050ti
Yeah, big title 'AMD cuts costs' (or Intel I don't care). What's that sort of clickbait crap is that?
Facebook
Twitter