Saylick
Golden Member
- Sep 10, 2012
- 1,598
- 1,955
- 136
Ah, forgot all about that product.Hm? No, it's probably just the formerly rumoured Raphael-H.
Ah, forgot all about that product.Hm? No, it's probably just the formerly rumoured Raphael-H.
And the i9 12900HX is a Mobile CPU isn't?"Highest core count for a mobile cpu" does not imply >16c, it just implies 16c. AMD made that phrase very carefully, read it again![]()
It most certainly is not: Investor Relations :: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD)
Ian never stated that slide came from AMD. That slide is not on their investor presentation: PowerPoint Presentation (d1io3yog0oux5.cloudfront.net), nor is it in in their corporate presentation: PowerPoint Presentation (d1io3yog0oux5.cloudfront.net). Furthermore, Dragon Range is not mentioned at all on the AMD website: site:amd.com "dragon range" - Google Search
AMD claims dragon range has highest core count for a mobile cpu. And what's the highest core count for mobile cpu? It's 16. So DR has 16 cores, simple.And the i9 12900HX is a Mobile CPU isn't?
What is the misspelling? I have seen official slides with misspellings. This could be a leak from an OEM source; perhaps something for laptop makers. They may have been less careful with something that wasn’t meant for wide distribution.Who said it was monolithic? Also, that does imply > 16c, since Intel has a '16 core' gaming CPU.
People keep saying chiplets on mobile can't be done. Adaptive IF and other power optimizations would allow chiplets to happen easily.
EDIT: That slide surely can't be from AMD. It has a misspelling.
It's an official slide given to only a handful of the press from AMD directly. Also, it's very common to find typos in AMD's slides lol.Ian never stated that slide came from AMD. That slide is not on their investor presentation: PowerPoint Presentation (d1io3yog0oux5.cloudfront.net), nor is it in in their corporate presentation: PowerPoint Presentation (d1io3yog0oux5.cloudfront.net). Furthermore, Dragon Range is not mentioned at all on the AMD website: site:amd.com "dragon range" - Google Search
Seems like Ian either received a fake leak or got the slide from a third-party source. Given that it has a misspelling, I am extremely skeptical of it being real.
Not really. Every competitor has to run predictions where the market and competition is years in advance. Closer to launch there can't be fundamental changes to the plans anymore, only to aspects of the launch execution like timing (staggering), pricing (segmentation), targeting as well as allocation of chips to different markets.It is possible that AMD changed their plans due to whatever intel is supposedly going to release.
Makes sense. Availability is another issue, of course . . .- 2023 CES debut
Seems like Ian either received a fake leak or got the slide from a third-party source. Given that it has a misspelling, I am extremely skeptical of it being real.
And You can bet their Mobile i9 HX Raptor Lake CPUs will be 24 Cores because Raptor Lake i9s will also be 8P + 16EAMD claims dragon range has highest core count for a mobile cpu. And what's the highest core count for mobile cpu? It's 16. So DR has 16 cores, simple.
Probably they are talking about performance cores.And You can bet their Mobile i9 HX Raptor Lake CPUs will be 24 Cores because Raptor Lake i9s will also be 8P + 16E
AMD is not even Acknowledging Intel's big/Little core.(at least has not acknowledged that recently).Probably they are talking about performance cores.
Well the DR could be introduced in Q1 2023 before any new Intel Mobile SKUs that could have more than 16 cores.AMD is not even Acknowledging Intel's big/Little core.(at least has not acknowledged that recently).
That has been true in the past, but with AMD’s flexible, modular architecture using MCM and/or stacked die, they can change up their products much more quickly. I am still wondering if the desktop IO die actually has 3 IFOP to keep a 3 cpu chiplet version an option. There are also may be more than one type of cpu chiplet available with the Zen 4c derivative. I have been assuming that it will be a stacked die, so it probably can’t be used with a standard mobile or desktop IO die, but it may not be stacked or they may have built some other modularity features into it allowing it to be used elsewhere. The EFB tech, if used similarly to the way the Apple M1 Ultra is built could add another level of flexibility and modularity by allowing multiple APUs or even multiple IO die to be connected together with very low power consumption.Not really. Every competitor has to run predictions where the market and competition is years in advance. Closer to launch there can't be fundamental changes to the plans anymore, only to aspects of the launch execution like timing (staggering), pricing (segmentation), targeting as well as allocation of chips to different markets.
No, that's why APUs will always be Monolithic.Do the modular chiplets allow for tighter small package designs?
No. They will go chiplet. Phoenix is not that product though.No, that's why APUs will always be Monolithic.
They will likely be stacked devices using SoIC or EFB rather than MCMs connected by serdes links. That takes too much power. The chips used in MCMs should never have been called chiplets really. That should have been reserved for packages using at least 2.5D or 3D stacking. An MCM is just multiple chips on a single package although they may be using some more advanced packaging technology in some cases that are not stacking but not a simple MCM either.No. They will go chiplet. Phoenix is not that product though.
It's still true today. Yes, AMD is more flexible using its different multi chips approaches. But those designs still needed to be planned well beforehand to reach that point.That has been true in the past, but with AMD’s flexible, modular architecture using MCM and/or stacked die, they can change up their products much more quickly.
I'm starting to think Raphael-H alias Dragon Range is the APU gone chiplet which will see further mobile oriented optimizations in later gens. I still doubt it will replace lower cost monolithic APUs though.No. They will go chiplet. Phoenix is not that product though.
So average IPC increase is still (15+24)/2 ~20%. Outliers don't count. You want reliable and generally applicable values.15-24% IPC Increase (Over Zen 3)![]()
AMD Ryzen 7000 'Raphael' Desktop CPU Leaks Out: 8 Zen 4 Cores, 5.2 GHz Max Clocks, RDNA 2 'GFX1036' Integrated Graphics Clocked at 2.0 GHz
AMD's Ryzen 7000 'Raphael' ES Desktop CPU has been spotted with 8 Zen 4 cores clocked at 5.2 GHz & RDNA 2 iGPU at 2.0 GHz.wccftech.com
8-14% Clock Increase (Over Zen 3)
28-37% ST Perf Increase (Over Zen 3)
Yeah, good luck to Intel beating AMD RDNA2 Level performance. Intel can't even get their Software/Drivers right.So back on APU topic.
In part due to rumor:
And if you consider Intel's Meteor Lake the main competitor for Zen4 will feature iGPU with 192 EU that puts it in striking range of RTX 3060M![]()
AMD Phoenix RDNA3 iGPU could be as fast as the slowest GeForce RTX 3060 mobile GPU - VideoCardz.com
AMD Phoenix APU with mid-range discrete GPU performance Greymon55 claims that the upcoming integrated graphics into the AMD Phoenix APU, could show comparable performance to the most power-restricted version of the RTX 3060 mobile. AMD Ryzen 7000 series will officially include two mobile series...videocardz.com
then AMD would be incompetent and stupid not to see ahead and pull along likewise.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Discussion RISC V Latest Developments Discussion [No Politics] | CPUs and Overclocking | 8 | |
G | Question Speculation: How would it affect AMD if Intel bought GlobalFoundries? | CPUs and Overclocking | 21 |