NOS: i have to agree with you on that point you. To upgrade to a decent tbird system you would be spending $175 for the KT7A-Raid and another $330 for your 255mhz 1.2ghz tbird, hmm i think we may need some ram there. So lets say another $75 for some of that Mosel CAS2 thats rated to 143mhz. It comes up to $580, now why in my right mind whould I pay $580 for something that underperforms a P4? Hmm 1.2ghz tbird or P4 1.4ghz for same price....hmmmm
And please don't anyone give me the crap about having to upgrade your power supply and your case,etc..etc..blah..blah
It doesn't need to be done.
Second: It seems like everyone around here is arguing about perormance and then when they are proven wrong they turn around and try to use the the "performance vs cost factor"
You can't have your cake and eat it too. Sure the GTS Ultra costs alot of money, but its the best damn video card out there, is it not?
Third: If 3dMark isn't a good program to judge the performance of a cpu/gpu, what is? All I must say is that once the new release of 3dmark is out, that supports the SSE2, then we will see what going on. I would like someone can show me a 3dmark score higher that 9200 using a non-ultra card and then factor in the fact that 3dMark 2000 isn't designed for DirectX 8, just imagine what it can do. Then again who knows what AMD new cpu will/can do? But thats how many months away?
I would like to make this offer to everyone. You tell me what programs to use to benchmark my system. What we need is a damn standard around here.
Ready to see what a P4 can do?
Large files, modem users beware. (Sorry gotta hate 1280x1024)
Pic #1
Pic #2
Pic #3
Pic #4
Heres a
smokin P4 system