Originally posted by: Vegetto
OH MY GOD, stevejst has risen with a new forum name! :Q!
HAHAHA...
Welcome back Steve
Originally posted by: Vegetto
OH MY GOD, stevejst has risen with a new forum name! :Q!
Originally posted by: Vegetto
OH MY GOD, stevejst has risen with a new forum name! :Q!
Originally posted by: gorillaman
Originally posted by: pspada
Originally posted by: smashp
I hope they continue to Challenge, Just to keep those Quality Intel proc prices LOW.
The bottom line is Intel Drives The market. I Amd cant start Getting a return on investment Soon, They wont be much more.
The bottom line is that Intel would not know the meaning of the word performance if it reared up and bit them.
Intel has been the performance leader for the last 6 months. You can make your MHz argument all you want. You say that AMD's 3200+ runs just as well as an actual 3200MHz Intel. Your right. Different architectures. Different MHz. Hence the PR rating. It's not that AMD doesn't want to reach those speeds, but can't. Yet. And it was already published that AMD will only plan on shipping 400,000 cpu's next year (2004) so their yield is definately low, or they dont expect many buyers. One or the other.
ENjoy
EDIT: DBZ, dont you dare say I'm crapping on this thread. I have said nothing that was out of line.
Just an afterthought.
THANKS
Originally posted by: smashp
I hope they continue to Challenge, Just to keep those Quality Intel proc prices LOW.
The bottom line is Intel Drives The market. I Amd cant start Getting a return on investment Soon, They wont be much more.
Originally posted by: smashp
Face it AMD new 64 bit chips largest limiter is ------AMD it self. The Company has not made a profit in the last 8 quarters and can not continue to compete much further.
Right now many Fanboys are claiming these 64bit are going to revolutionize things.
The bottom line is AMD will fail. They no longer have the means to realistically challenge Intel.
Im talking purely finacially.
Originally posted by: smashp
HP Huh, Talk to any major IT guys latelly on their opinion of HP. IT department are canning HP Because when you call enterprise level support, you cant tell if your talking to A Tech or the owner of the 7-eleven down the street.
ROFL!Originally posted by: SickBeast
This thread is just like my AMD 1700+...unlocked for some strange and unknown reason.
Are you kidding? I'm surprised they ever get to look in on us with how busy they stay trying to police that zoo called ATOTOriginally posted by: mechBgon
ROFL!Originally posted by: SickBeast
This thread is just like my AMD 1700+...unlocked for some strange and unknown reason.
but yeah, where's the Mod That Goes Bump In The Night when you need him/her?
I'm not quite sure I understand.....could you do it again?Originally posted by: mechBgon
Actually, I believe there's a way to call in the Mods, and that is to do this:
- Press the N key
- Press the E key
- Press the F key
- Press the ! key
- Now click the Reply to Topic button, then the Backspace key. Repeat this step a couple times. From what I hear, it's like the Bat Signal is to Batman.
Originally posted by: Jeff7181
Originally posted by: gorillaman
Originally posted by: pspada
Originally posted by: smashp
I hope they continue to Challenge, Just to keep those Quality Intel proc prices LOW.
The bottom line is Intel Drives The market. I Amd cant start Getting a return on investment Soon, They wont be much more.
The bottom line is that Intel would not know the meaning of the word performance if it reared up and bit them.
Intel has been the performance leader for the last 6 months. You can make your MHz argument all you want. You say that AMD's 3200+ runs just as well as an actual 3200MHz Intel. Your right. Different architectures. Different MHz. Hence the PR rating. It's not that AMD doesn't want to reach those speeds, but can't. Yet. And it was already published that AMD will only plan on shipping 400,000 cpu's next year (2004) so their yield is definately low, or they dont expect many buyers. One or the other.
ENjoy
EDIT: DBZ, dont you dare say I'm crapping on this thread. I have said nothing that was out of line.
Just an afterthought.
THANKS
You can't crap a thread that was crapped in the origional post...
Originally posted by: dguy6789
amd's pr rating is nearly 100% accurate untill the "c" p4s came out, the 2500 is about as fast as p42.53, 2600 -2.66, the 3000 to the 3.06ghz. they were all right on the block, then 800 fsb changed how fats intels cpus were, you canht blame amd. I would take an athlon xp 3200+ system over a p43.2ghz system any day. The athlon xp still owns in general usage performance and buisisness apps, and the amd 64 is even better. and amd is not having yield problems because they have been overclocked to 2.8ghz 100% stable FYI. So dont say junk about anything untill you know hwat your talking about period.
Originally posted by: smashp
The bottom line is AMD will fail. They no longer have the means to realistically challenge Intel.
Im talking purely finacially.