n/mAh.
Since the phenomenon was confined to the US of A (we'll not speculate as to why it was confined to there...), I never heard of it.
They should call it the General Custer.
Because this is literally AMD's last stand in desktop CPU's, they screw this up its game over for good.
My opinion is that objectively owning the concept of Zen means treating it with respect. That's not going to be very marketable with much of the target market. Westerners aping Eastern concepts badly to market a product like in those examples is likely to make any relatively sophisticated shopper at least roll their eyes. I know that rancid Flo character for Progressive and all this pseudo-irony is huge in marketing but it's stale and lowbrow. I will give Flo one thing, though, she's not a talking gecko.
Something more neutral and direct like AMD III can be as heavy-handed and Westernized as possible (something they tried to do with the construction names) but the name itself isn't corny and its neutrality gives it a lot of flexibility in terms of how it can be presented. The only risk is that the presentation will be too bland. But, that's where decent imaging comes in.
That was my post on the first page.I don't think that Zen will be used for the simple reason that it might be difficult to trademark the name Zen. You can trademark Phenom, Athlon and Pentium, but probably not Zen.
However, I don't think that Zen will be used for the simple reason that it might be difficult to trademark the name Zen. You can trademark Phenom, Athlon and Pentium, but probably not Zen.
That was my post on the first page.
Zin doesn't mean anything and has no cachet. It doesn't even do anything interesting with the name AMD (unlike III which rhymes). But, it's not as awful as Ryzen and Threadripper.
Regardless, it's still better than the rest of them.In Portuguese, "vara" means "stick", with strong sexual connotation. "Varuna" is a Hindu God.
Yes, to satisfy all of them is impossible. But to satisfy at least the ten most spoken languages seems to be feasible (and desirable).I'll also say that finding something not already trademarked that's decent is very very very difficult. Then, trying to satisfy all the world's languages simultaneously on top of that...
I think that, in the Internet era, just one name should be the ultimate goal. Just my opinion though. I know it's not easy.AMD just needs to use a decent name for English speakers. If it is bad somewhere else then use a different name to market it there.
Interesting you mention this wrt all the trademark talk in this thread. I work adjacent to trademark practice and dabble in it occasionally. Major brands like Starbucks actually do hire out local law firms to do exhaustive searches on the name including vulgarity checks for not only the name, but transliterations of the primary trademark's language too. They check this against many / all of their markets. Results in quite large searches across dozens of languages and cultures. Very expensive. I'm not sure AMD's TM strategy is as sophisticated as Starbucks (they are likely leading edge on this) but they've got to be pretty good if they want to be a billion dollar company.Yes, to satisfy all of them is impossible. But to satisfy at least the ten most spoken languages seems to be feasible (and desirable).
I think that, in the Internet era, just one name should be the ultimate goal. Just my opinion though. I know it's not easy.
This is very interesting. I guess that Starbucks' profit margins are huge... They transform coffee and flour into gold... So they have all the money they need to perform such large searches.Interesting you mention this wrt all the trademark talk in this thread. I work adjacent to trademark practice and dabble in it occasionally. Major brands like Starbucks actually do hire out local law firms to do exhaustive searches on the name including vulgarity checks for not only the name, but transliterations of the primary trademark's language too. They check this against many / all of their markets. Results in quite large searches across dozens of languages and cultures. Very expensive. I'm not sure AMD's TM strategy is as sophisticated as Starbucks (they are likely leading edge on this) but they've got to be pretty good if they want to be a billion dollar company.
Yep, I like that "Zen" has been kept as a name.I like Ryzen. Mainly I like that it has Zen in it. I think if they could, they probably would have just kept Zen, but I am sure trademarking Zen would be a legal minefield.
Yeah the name's a bit silly but, it's growing on me. Also it might appeal to the younger/gamer crowd which is really what counts. We old enthusiasts don't care what it's called. How does it run is all we care about.
I mean, they already filed for THREADRIPPER so there's no good names left out there. They already peaked.
It's pronounced Rye-Zen.Yep, I like that "Zen" has been kept as a name.
Just about always the code names are far more endearing than the actual retail names.
Even though it was a disaster Operating System, I always liked the code name of "Longhorn" for Vista.
So is Ryzen pronounced as "Risen" or "Rye-zen"?
I like the "Risen from the Dead" vibe.
Poetry is only a step above basket weaving in the collective consciousness today. And baskets are objectively more useful.Who knows better his own language (and, most of the time, a lot of other languages)? The poet. I mean, not a mere rhymer, but a real poet, or even an inventive prose writer, known or unknown, famous or not. I would invest in such people if I were "in the business". Because real poets are not limited to research: they can invent. And because they are in the poetry business (and not in the marketing business), they are able to invent good poetry (good names).
Of course, I can be totally wrong. But, if I'm not, I hope that Lisa Su read this and send me a Ryzen (or a Vega) in retribution.
Don't underestimate the importance of their name in being able to do that. Very lofty. The coffee of the stars...This is very interesting. I guess that Starbucks' profit margins are huge... They transform coffee and flour into gold...
Well, yes, of course. Companies have been burned publicly by names that have sexual connotations in particular elsewhere. I still think people need to be capable of seeing their own language separately of others'. Just give a product a different name in another market if the other name doesn't work there. It's not like you don't have all sorts of localization adjustments happening to products themselves, like being able to get hash brown pies or whatever they are in Japan but not in the US at McDonald's. If the products themselves can be so different what's do difficult about changing a name?Major brands like Starbucks actually do hire out local law firms to do exhaustive searches on the name including vulgarity checks for not only the name, but transliterations of the primary trademark's language too. They check this against many / all of their markets. Results in quite large searches across dozens of languages and cultures. Very expensive.