thanks!!!
I would say underwhelming.Performance between 2070 and 2080. Pathetic.
Performance between 2070 and 2080. Pathetic.
So a theoretical 2070ti hitting the middle ground between 2070 and 2080 in both performance and pricing would be pathetic. Good to know you think this way of Turing.Performance between 2070 and 2080. Pathetic.
So a theoretical 2070ti hitting the middle ground between 2070 and 2080 in both performance and pricing would be pathetic. Good to know you think this way of Turing.
I would expect this card to get the flak for poor day 1 driver support, noise, availability, but performance?!
I just hope they do support this card with better drivers. having only 10,000 or so made and Navi on the way, somehow I don't see it.So a theoretical 2070ti hitting the middle ground between 2070 and 2080 in both performance and pricing would be pathetic. Good to know you think this way of Turing.
I would expect this card to get the flak for poor day 1 driver support, noise, availability, but performance?!
There's no reason someone would buy it for gaming unless they absolutely refuse to buy Nvidia cards.
NVIDIA cards are compatible with all freesync + gsync monitors right nowPlus its comparable with all freesync monitors unlike the RTX cards.
That's really just a tie though, isn't it? it's likely within the margin of error of testing and not anything you'd notice while playing the game.Depends on the games you want to play. For example for BF V, I would choose the Radeon VII over the RTX 2080.
Plus its comparable with all freesync monitors unlike the RTX cards.
https://techreport.com/review/34453/amd-radeon-vii-graphics-card-reviewed/9
That's really just a tie though, isn't it? it's likely within the margin of error of testing and not anything you'd notice while playing the game.
Any monitor that doesn't work by default is probably a garbage experience. Anyway, you can still force it if you want.Plus its comparable with all freesync monitors unlike the RTX cards.
Depends on the games you want to play. For example for BF V, I would choose the Radeon VII over the RTX 2080.
Plus its comparable with all freesync monitors unlike the RTX cards.
https://techreport.com/review/34453/amd-radeon-vii-graphics-card-reviewed/9
Look here:I will suggest you look again the frametime diagrams, you will definitely notice while playing the game especially in Online MultiPlayer games like BF.
I challenge you to watch this space for people defending the value proposition of VII, then go look at the RTX 2080 threads and see how it went down. If we are to be objective both offerings from both vendors offer little to no value over their previous gens, and yet there still are posters like the one above who thinks only today's product brings "pathetic" performance.The 2080 was, quite rightly, hammered for it's poor price/performance. AMD has somehow managed to turn up late with a card that offers even worse price/performance. Plus all the other issues you just mentioned. 5-10% slower and yet costs the same. There's no reason someone would buy it for gaming unless they absolutely refuse to buy Nvidia cards.
I don't agree with you at all.I will suggest you look again at the frametime diagrams, you will definitely notice while playing the game especially in Online MultiPlayer games like BF.
Back to school for you. Task = meaning of English words with priority given to "pathetic".Performance between 2070 and 2080. Pathetic.
That UV is insane damn good.almost 90w.
https://www.computerbase.de/2019-02...ahme-der-grafikkarte-kingdom-come-deliverance
from 272w to 189w in Kingdom Come: Deliverance , AMD should releases new driver to do AUTO UV.